@TabbyMumz
"I understand that, but you must know that it's incredibly unlikely that the government will choose to screw over every child for a small minority?"
But society as a whole isnt a small minority is it. That's why they closed schools in the first place. Thats exactly what I mean. You think the vulnerable are a small minority that can be dispensed with. And I hate this attitude "screw them over"..they havent been screwed over for goodness sake, they have been protected and safeguarded from a virus. Why do you want them back? Why do you want to put a whole society at harm just for a few kids so as they can get back to school a bit earlier, why cant they wait a bit longer, or put in place part time safer schooling?
They closed
everything to save the NHS, to flatten the curve. They put shielding in place for vulnerable people. Schools didn't close
for them.
The vulnerable compared to the healthy are a minority. The majority of the country are not vulnerable.
Children have been protected and safeguarded from a virus that very rarely effects them in any meaningful name? Righty ho. And they've been abused, left to go hungry, abandoned by schools in some cases, isolated. Seems a great trade off doesn't it?
I want them to go back because children need school. They need education, they need routine, they need friends, they need normality. Their parents need to work to keep the roof over their heads and put food on the table.
Wait a bit longer? When? October? Christmas? New year? Next Easter?
Part time schooling is not good enough. It creates an even bigger education gap, it's problematic for working parents, it creates further "bubble" related issues (where do you think the kids are who aren't in school?)