Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Pedants' corner

You've got another think coming...

220 replies

soupyspoon · 26/07/2025 11:46

I mean god preserve us (someone will pick me up that I didn't capitalise god ...)

Another thread, which I think we're not allowed to talk about probably, massive argument about...

You've got another think coming.

People think that it's 'you've got another thing coming'

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
PestoHoliday · 26/07/2025 15:08

BlotAnExpert · 26/07/2025 15:00

Another similar (but worse, imho) example is Americans saying 'I could care less' instead of 'I couldn't care less'. It makes no sense. They are idiots.

It was in the 1980s that being sarcastic was very much part of the North American vernacular - "that's amazing, NOT!" "Like I give a shit!" etc.

"I could care less" was part of that. As the overall trend died out, remnants stuck around. Without the context they look nonsensical, but that's where I comes from

"Fika" in Swedish is a similar thing. About 100 years ago it was cool.and fun to reverse syllables as a sort of slang. Kafi became Fika and it stuck long after the slang trend fell by the wayside.

Oftenaddled · 26/07/2025 15:22

Trovindia · 26/07/2025 15:07

The issue is with the use of the word another, which doesn't work if you then say thing, because there was no original "thing". The word another references the word think, therefore the second word has to be think.

The original thing is the thing that you originally thought/ expected as a result of your original thought.

soupyspoon · 26/07/2025 15:37

LaurieFairyCake · 26/07/2025 13:35

It’s both.

The original is ‘thing’ and the only one I use as I’ve thought people who used think we’re just hard of hearing.

No. Its not both

Its not both.

OP posts:
TheNightingalesStarling · 26/07/2025 15:40

It was thing when I was growing up. I accept im wrong ...

But thing made perfect sense. An euphemism for a consequence. Like how adults put in a benign word to replace a swear word

soupyspoon · 26/07/2025 15:41

mathanxiety · 26/07/2025 14:16

"I need a think about that"?
Surely it should be, "I need to think about that"?
'A think' is an example of the word 'to' falling victim to the speed of spoken language.

Also, apropos of nothing, grammar and grandma do not rhyme, and that is a fact

No, Im having a long hard think. Having a think. Going to have a think

OP posts:
Trovindia · 26/07/2025 15:51

Oftenaddled · 26/07/2025 15:22

The original thing is the thing that you originally thought/ expected as a result of your original thought.

The original thing was a think, so the second thing needs to also be a think. This is particularly important because the phrase is heavy to be a bit of a play on words.

Oftenaddled · 26/07/2025 16:30

Trovindia · 26/07/2025 15:51

The original thing was a think, so the second thing needs to also be a think. This is particularly important because the phrase is heavy to be a bit of a play on words.

If the think was the original thing, then the other thing can also be a think, though.

Or it's the reality that will replace your false expectation, i.e. if you think you can get away with this, you have another thing coming: you think you are going to get away with it, but another thing will happen instead.

It doesn't have the wordplay element, but it makes sense all the same.

TheOnlyLivingBoyInNewCross · 26/07/2025 16:34

LaurieFairyCake · 26/07/2025 13:35

It’s both.

The original is ‘thing’ and the only one I use as I’ve thought people who used think we’re just hard of hearing.

(A) It’s not both.
(B) The original is ‘think’.
(C) People who use ‘think’ are not hard of hearing but accurate.

Apart from those three things, everything else you say is spot on!

TheyFuckYouUpYourMamAndDad · 26/07/2025 16:55

slightlydistrac · 26/07/2025 13:29

Well I've just had to watch the Michael Buble video (in the interests of public duty you understand) any excuse 😂 and it sounds like 'think' to me.

Anyhow, if he has got it wrong, I shall be magnanimous and forgive him. 😎

@slightlydistracsame…I’ve just listened to the recording AND watched the video and he definitely says ‘think’ 👌🏻😍

Trovindia · 26/07/2025 16:55

Oftenaddled · 26/07/2025 16:30

If the think was the original thing, then the other thing can also be a think, though.

Or it's the reality that will replace your false expectation, i.e. if you think you can get away with this, you have another thing coming: you think you are going to get away with it, but another thing will happen instead.

It doesn't have the wordplay element, but it makes sense all the same.

You are totally missing my point, which I can't be bothered to rephrase yet again. Suffice to say, you are incorrect.

LadySuzanne · 26/07/2025 17:58

I was born in the early 1950s.

The phrase was "If you think XXXXX XXX XXXX then you've got another think coming."

It was never "another thing coming".

And while I'm here, in the UK, the phrase is "I couldn't care less..." Not "I could care less..."

Halsall · 26/07/2025 18:02

LadySuzanne · 26/07/2025 17:58

I was born in the early 1950s.

The phrase was "If you think XXXXX XXX XXXX then you've got another think coming."

It was never "another thing coming".

And while I'm here, in the UK, the phrase is "I couldn't care less..." Not "I could care less..."

This is correct. All of it.

butterpuffed · 26/07/2025 19:14

'You've got another think coming' as in 'Think again'.

BrickBiscuit · 26/07/2025 20:10

It is absolutely ‘think’. ‘Thing’ is never correct.

For example: “If you think ‘should of’ is correct, you’ve got another think coming”.

Oftenaddled · 26/07/2025 20:15

Trovindia · 26/07/2025 16:55

You are totally missing my point, which I can't be bothered to rephrase yet again. Suffice to say, you are incorrect.

With respect, if you're not willing to explain why I'm wrong, I'll stick with my view - and the evidence of widespread establishment usage - that both are fine.

"Think" does not need to be repeated - though the wordplay is fun in that version. "Another" does not need to refer to a specific word already used. The logic of the expression works either way. It's a slightly different logic either way, but that's okay.

"Think" is the version I've always used, but that simply doesn't make an alternative idiom incorrect.

softlyfallsthesnow · 26/07/2025 20:26

TheOnlyLivingBoyInNewCross · 26/07/2025 16:34

(A) It’s not both.
(B) The original is ‘think’.
(C) People who use ‘think’ are not hard of hearing but accurate.

Apart from those three things, everything else you say is spot on!

Grin
latetothefisting · 26/07/2025 22:58

Sundaybananas · 26/07/2025 14:14

“Break a leg” is a theatre saying - it is bad luck to wish good luck, so you say the opposite.

Yeah I explained I know what it "means" - not being rude but the q wasn't about the background or history or whatever of sayings, its whether they make sense. and wishing someone good luck by referring to them getting a serious injury clearly doesn't.

latetothefisting · 26/07/2025 23:03

Christwosheds · 26/07/2025 14:35

Darkest before dawn is pretty self explanatory. The darkest part of night is the small hours before dawn.
Teaching your grandmother to suck eggs - raw eggs were commonly eaten, particularly by older people as they are soft, so something Grandmothers would be adept at doing.

But the darkest part of the night ISNT before dawn. it's no darker at 4am than it is at 1am. Thus why it doesn't make sense.

latetothefisting · 26/07/2025 23:06

TheyFuckYouUpYourMamAndDad · 26/07/2025 16:55

@slightlydistracsame…I’ve just listened to the recording AND watched the video and he definitely says ‘think’ 👌🏻😍

Again. Official lyrics version. With Buble pointing at the words as he sings them. Including "thing". Could not be clearer.
You might be hearing it as think because of the emphasis on the "c" of "coming" but its clearly (though incorrectly) "thing".

WhisperGold · 26/07/2025 23:25

Tryingtokeepgoing · 26/07/2025 12:41

Shouldn’t it be ‘which I think we’re probably not allowed to talk about’ rather than ‘which I think we’re not allowed to talk about, probably,’? Or to be even more pedantic, ‘that I think we’re probably not allowed to talk about’?

But then that also begs the question whether there ought to be a space between closing quotation marks and a question mark, and whether single or double quotation marks are appropriate for a UK hosted but international (of sorts…) forum 😂

I think it raises the question.
Begging the question is something quite different, and too complex for me to remember what it means exactly. But it's not that.

upinaballoon · 27/07/2025 03:40

StrictlyAFemaleFemale · 26/07/2025 12:14

I've always heard it as another thing coming. I've googled and Mariam Webster says think is the original saying which has evolved into thing, but both are correct.

I don't think either is illogical.

upinaballoon · 27/07/2025 03:43

You've racked up 4 pages while my back was turned yesterday. I want time to catch up.

BrickBiscuit · 27/07/2025 05:54

soupyspoon · 26/07/2025 12:22

Both are not correct. It hasnt 'evolved' into anything, its just plain wrong and illogical

People have misheard because of the way 'think' flows into 'coming' and then they mis say it.

I was always interested to note that Bud Flanagan does not pronounce the ‘k’ in think throughout the ‘Dad's Army’ theme song. We hear ‘Who do you thing you are kidding Mr Hitler’, while the meaning is clearly think. This despite flowing into vowels not consonants (‘think you’ and ‘think Old’).

PeonyBulb · 27/07/2025 06:03

I’ve never said the phrase in my life or heard anyone ever use it but I do know the phrase.

I did actually think it was ‘another thing coming’ but only because of how it sounds and I’ve never given it much thought as I’ve never used it or heard it spoken out loud.

But I am glad I know how it’s meant to be used

Steelworks · 27/07/2025 06:03

I’ve always said ‘thing’ and it’s always made perfect sense to me. Ie. It means you’ve got something else coming, another item, action, event etc.