My posts re male circumsition;
Mon 03-Mar-08 18:25:27
There are very real risks to male circumsion.
I don't believe in the mutilation of anyone's genitals, let alone a defenceless infacts, which is what circumsition is, traditional mutilation that is. Female circumsition is justified by tradition too. None of it is acceptable in mu opinion.
Byt that is my opinion. Just adding to the melting pot.
Why can't your partner wait and let his son make up his own mind when he is an adult?
Then at 22:11:55
I'm not jumping the gun MO - they are both mutilations; I know one is more brutal than another, I'm not equating them on that level; but that doesn't make one less wrong if we are talking about individual sovereignty, they are both just as wrong on that level.
Between these;
mehdismummy on Mon 03-Mar-08 18:44:24
what a surprise finding you against it monkeytrousers. Getting ready to start your vile racist thoughts are you? Imo you are no better than ucm but just use fancy words to be a racist. What the hell do you think you are doing linking a site that will just scare the poor woman. My ds has had the op because he is a muslim ( cue monkeytrousers to start on her islam speech again) and he was fine. It healed in two weeks. Never caused him pain and he is fine. She is not going to hut to get it done ffs. We had ds done at ulch so he was in the best hands. Is you dh a muslim btw stiggles? If there was a real risk the doctor would tell you.
mehdismummy on Mon 03-Mar-08 19:28:35:
bet you any moneytrousers is leading the nos!
mehdismummy on Mon 03-Mar-08 19:52:55
i am not being ridiculous hercules. I have been on other threads where monkeytrousers has been nothing but racist. She belive me was just warming up to slate islam btw. Its up to the ds mummy no one else.