Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Other subjects

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Modelling for Babies

1399 replies

Donna247 · 01/11/2001 20:28

does anyone know any models adacey for babys modeling?
or any websites for it?

OP posts:
Crunchie · 04/07/2003 09:45

MOT junior. They have a website here Poppy is on page 2 of the 3 - 6 years page! I am sure it is worth calling them, but they are quite strict and only have a couple of kids with a similar look in each age band. Hence with us it was lucky they had no other blond blue eyed little princess when we saw them! Good Luck!

Crunchie · 04/07/2003 09:47

bugger the first time I try a link it doesn't work. OK try this here

Rhubarb · 04/07/2003 15:39

Soupdragon, I know quite a few kids with SN so they are not really that much of a minority. My sister for example would probably love to enter her son in for a 'cutie' competition, but he has Downs so is unlikely to win. And yes, she is afraid of negative feedback. As a mother of a child with a disfigurement of any kind, you know your child is less than perfect, but you don't want other people telling you that.
I see my teenage nieces getting paranoid about their looks, they say that they are too plump, or their noses are too big, or their lips too big, because they are inundated with models in teen mags and on television that are perfect and skinny, with no blemishes or blotches, you hardly ever even see a model wearing glasses! (Unless it's an ad for Specsavers!)
I've seen kids covered in boils, psoriasis, burns, strawberry birth marks, some without hair, etc, etc. Yet they are the most beautiful children inside. But you wouldn't think that they way they are treated by society, most people avoid them like the plague! Personally I would like to see all beauty competitions banned and dummies used to model clothes instead of children. That way we don't get brainwashed about what we perceive as perfection and maybe we'd be more accepting as a society.

But I do understand why mums put their kids into these competitions, we all like to think our kids are beautiful and it's a huge complement to have that confirmed by others. I'm just also too aware of the mums who never get that confirmation.

SoupDragon · 04/07/2003 16:02

And out of all the children & people I know, I know 1 SN child (deafness) so that's quite a minority

SoupDragon · 04/07/2003 16:05

I meant children and adults... obviously children are people too

Jimjams · 04/07/2003 16:25

Rhubarb - this is really interesting. Something I've read in several different sources about autistic children is that they are usually very good looking (and this wasn't written in a "little angels" type way- just as a fact). So anyway I've performed a totally biased survery completely unscientific. Now obviously my ds1 is totally beautiful and anyone could see that - but no seriously I have discovered that just like any other children they vary. Some are absolutely gorgeous (according totally to society's predjudice) and some are not! So I decided that this was just predjudice. They are supposedly "mentally handicapped" or something of that sort but don't fit the image- they look "normal" therefore we're so surprised to find they don't fit our minds image we see them as more attractive than they are.....Being beautiful becomes part of the checklist. Does that make sense?

I wouldn never let ds1 model- couldn't think of anything more stressful for him but I'd love to see more SEN kids in magazines etc. They could use the little boy with cp on Richard and Judy last night - he was adorable. You're right though- I don't think children with Down's would stand a chance of winning.

Have you heard about parents giving their Down's children plastic surgery. At first I was absolutely horrified, but then I could understnad why they had chosen to do it. It seemed to be particularly common amongst parents whose children were very high functioning, and it was done to avoid their child falling prey to society's predjudices. Personally I think it's a sad reflection on society, but then most attitudes within society towards SN are- but I do understand why parents would make that choice.

Jimjams · 04/07/2003 16:53

tell you what - judge for yourselves- is he gorgeous or what
www.autism-plymouth.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/ds1.html

tamum · 04/07/2003 17:07

Jimjams, I can honestly say completely objectively that yes, he is gorgeous!
Very interesting post, incidentally, I can see what you mean about people's expectations of SN compared with the reality. I felt like you about surgery for Down's, too, initially appalled and then realising what the motivation is. Kind of like the boy with achondroplasia on the TV program; you start off feeling that's it more for the parents' benefit, and then realise that it is genuinely being done with the child's best interests at heart.
I like the URL, ds1.html, BTW!
One more thing- I'm sure I've seen quite a few children with special needs in the ELC catalogues in the past, I think there was a wee girl in a wheelchair, and a boy with Down's. So three cheers for them.

janh · 04/07/2003 17:46

He IS gorgeous, jimjams - what a really happy smile that is! (And are those dimples?)

(Incidentally, I know it's not the same, but you do see kids in ads now with buck teeth, missing teeth, specs, braces etc - not all beautiful and perfect. I seem to think that not so many years ago there would have been no black/asian/oriental children in ads in Britain either so maybe in a few more years SN children will feature too. Hope so.)

tigermoth · 05/07/2003 09:38

What a beautiful blondie jimjams. I remember you saying on other threads that your son is really affectionate, thereby defying the autism stereotype. That certainly come across in the photo.

This is an interesting discussion. Just to add my 2ps worth, I wish we saw more pics of child models being naughty - well normal in fact - and taken off guard. ie spattering paint on their clothes, pulling a face, or a group shot of several boys rolling around playfighting or a couple of them arguing with mum in a supermarket, or a toddler chewing his cuff.

Many shots seem so posed - far too many cute smiles. Or you get pics of dreamy children walking along the beach or a cheeky chappy with a baseball cap on back to front. Most children aren't like that for most of the time. Why not let the models loose in a playground and show them like they really are?

willow2 · 05/07/2003 12:09

gorgeous

Mocha · 05/07/2003 22:37

Jimjams, he is a lovely little boy

ThomCat · 07/07/2003 14:14

JimJams - you little boy is just lovely, what a smile. a great pic - thanks for sharing.
I think you're wrong about kids with DS not standing a chance of 'winning'. At the moment 90% if not more, of people don't know Lottie has Down's when they meet her & are shocked when i mention it. She is so pretty and smiley that she'd have a very good chance of 'winning', I just don't have the time or the inclation to put her up for modelling. All the pictures of kids I've seen who have Down's have all been so adorable, i think there is something about them, I can't put my finger on it, but they just make me melt and always make me smile. i'm sure I'm not the only one to feel that way. I think kids with Downs stand as good a chance as anyone in my eyes.

lou33 · 07/07/2003 15:09

Jimjams he looks lovely!

kimsy · 09/07/2003 13:53

Hello all seems to have gone a bit quiet in here now!
So does any of your kids do modelling if so what agency is it for I am still searching for a decent agency as there are not many about!
take care kim

sam65 · 14/08/2003 15:36

does anyone know the web address of elizabeth smith?

lou33 · 14/08/2003 17:53

It's here. They only take pictures by post though. Hth.

misdee · 14/08/2003 17:56

cotton comfort (a specialist clothing company i use) have children with eczema in their catalogue. i know some people dont see that as anything major, but to actually find a clothing company which specialises in eczema clothing to use kids with eczema makes me think that hopefully my dd1 will not be bullied because of her skin.

newgirl · 20/08/2003 19:43

I used to work for a publisher producing baby books and we used mums and babies in shoots all the time. A reputable company will never ask for money up front. If you are serious about modeling, then send a good pic of you both to the handful of publishers/mags who use baby models and don't expect to hear from them. They will keep your pics until a project pops up. They would much rather contact you direct then pay a fee to an agency. If you do go with the big agencies, then be aware that you will only get paid expenses really, and it is quite stressful as its unlikely that your babe will want to do what the photographer wants to do, when they need to. Also, most of them just ask friends - its easier and cheaper.

willow2 · 20/08/2003 21:49

Like newgirl, I used to book kids for shoots too -but have to say that I always used agencies to find the right kids for each job and never, ever booked someone as a result of having their photograph sent in. And no, the big agencies don't only pay expenses, the rates are pretty good. IME kids are paid by the hour with a minimum rate of two hours per job - so even if your child is only there for five minutes they will get paid as if they've been there for two hours. Hourly rates for magazines are around the £30 mark - but advertising rates are much better.

kimsy · 21/08/2003 12:34

and good recommended agencies then?

willow2 · 21/08/2003 21:41

Elizabeth Smith, Rascals, Tiny Tots, Bruce & Browns, Scallywaygs have all been around for a while. Used to use the first three a lot.

kimsy · 31/08/2003 19:14

do you have Rascals, Tiny Tots, Bruce & Browns web pages willow?

willow2 · 01/09/2003 10:53

No - but they are in the phone book. All based in and around London.

sam65 · 14/09/2003 22:11

i have got an appointment for my for my daughter to see little acorns. Any advice anyone? r they any good or not!

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.