Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

News

Andy Burnham says wealthy areas must house more migrants after leafy village revolts over 1,250 asylum seekers

246 replies

MrsLifeisnotabowlofcherries4 · Yesterday 09:42

Andy Burnham just doesn't get it does he, we don't want anymore migrants/illegals put anywhere not in rich or poor areas we want to stop them coming here full stop.

OP posts:
billandtedsexcellentadventure · Yesterday 13:20

If someone said to me get over to Spain and they’ll let you live in a half a million pound house, everything paid for, I think I’d go!

tommyhoundmum · Yesterday 13:21

GodDamnitDonut · Yesterday 11:17

You do sound like my 17 year child, who is in fact addicted to tik tok, so you get the comments you deserve. Calling people love without their permission doesn’t make you sound any smarter. You sound like a rude, virtue signalling teenager.

I had to explain to a friend from the North that when she says love it's quite different from the way it is sometimes said in the South when it is often patronising

Mugsey62 · Yesterday 13:22

EasternStandard · Yesterday 13:18

They could write to their MP asking for accommodation nearby them. More effective and I’m sure politicians would be happy to hear who is keen.

They may have already done that but how could they have rephrased their post so it didn't appear they were virtue signalling?

EasternStandard · Yesterday 13:24

Mugsey62 · Yesterday 13:22

They may have already done that but how could they have rephrased their post so it didn't appear they were virtue signalling?

Why is it needed? The rant. They can do their bit and feel great. Have mass accommodation nearby to them and be happy.

Others can say no, no admonishment required.

summater · Yesterday 13:24

It might level down the house prices a bit which would surely be a good thing

Mugsey62 · Yesterday 13:30

billandtedsexcellentadventure · Yesterday 13:20

If someone said to me get over to Spain and they’ll let you live in a half a million pound house, everything paid for, I think I’d go!

How likely would you say it was for asylum seekers to be given a 500 000 house?

Mugsey62 · Yesterday 13:32

EasternStandard · Yesterday 13:24

Why is it needed? The rant. They can do their bit and feel great. Have mass accommodation nearby to them and be happy.

Others can say no, no admonishment required.

Well the OP was hostile towards asylum seekers, does everyone have to agree with this or can they offer an alternative viewpoint?

Mugsey62 · Yesterday 13:35

tommyhoundmum · Yesterday 13:21

I had to explain to a friend from the North that when she says love it's quite different from the way it is sometimes said in the South when it is often patronising

I am a Northerner myself, and it can also be patronising up there as well. TBH I think it's more of a social class thing.

Middle class women hate it everywhere but they are a bit more accepting of it up North.

EasternStandard · Yesterday 13:38

Mugsey62 · Yesterday 13:32

Well the OP was hostile towards asylum seekers, does everyone have to agree with this or can they offer an alternative viewpoint?

I don’t mind if people are keen to have the housing or mass accommodation nearby, it’s up to them.

I do question what they’d do if in a town such as Piddington faced with the barracks whether they would be in 4% who would be ok.

PissedOffInPiddington · Yesterday 13:45

summater · Yesterday 13:24

It might level down the house prices a bit which would surely be a good thing

Not for me, not for my friends. It has got to the point now that we are trying to link up with America and become the 51st state and no longer be part of England.

The area will be ruined if this goes ahead. Totally ruined. I have so much anger for our new PM.

tommyhoundmum · Yesterday 13:53

Mugsey62 · Yesterday 13:35

I am a Northerner myself, and it can also be patronising up there as well. TBH I think it's more of a social class thing.

Middle class women hate it everywhere but they are a bit more accepting of it up North.

Edited

That sounds about right. I don't mind when I'm up North but won't allow it here just because I am little, old or anything else.

Terrribletwos · Yesterday 13:53

PissedOffInPiddington · Yesterday 13:45

Not for me, not for my friends. It has got to the point now that we are trying to link up with America and become the 51st state and no longer be part of England.

The area will be ruined if this goes ahead. Totally ruined. I have so much anger for our new PM.

I am interested to know how it will be ruined? And how you will be become a 51st state?

Backedoffhackedoff · Yesterday 13:55

Terrribletwos · Yesterday 13:53

I am interested to know how it will be ruined? And how you will be become a 51st state?

These posts are unbelievably self obsessed and also don’t sound very mentally healthy.

EasternStandard · Yesterday 13:57

PissedOffInPiddington · Yesterday 13:45

Not for me, not for my friends. It has got to the point now that we are trying to link up with America and become the 51st state and no longer be part of England.

The area will be ruined if this goes ahead. Totally ruined. I have so much anger for our new PM.

Welcome to Piddington poster, I don’t blame you.

I think faced with the same posters here would sign the polite referendum too.

drspouse · Yesterday 13:57

EasternStandard · Yesterday 12:15

That’s good. Would you be ok with mass accommodation in barracks as per Piddington or would you sign against having it as they have?

We already have a number of families (not sure about single men, they are around but I think in HMOs) in a barracks locally. We are coping fine thanks.
But we also coped when the barracks were full of squaddies. Also mainly young men away from home.
The difference is they had something to do. Maybe that's what Piddington needs, get the drill sergeant to come and stay.

cowasballerina · Yesterday 13:58

Yes how will the area be ruined? The men won't be in the village proper. As a pp says, they will be managed onsite, with transport provided for trips to the nearest town.

EasternStandard · Yesterday 14:00

drspouse · Yesterday 13:57

We already have a number of families (not sure about single men, they are around but I think in HMOs) in a barracks locally. We are coping fine thanks.
But we also coped when the barracks were full of squaddies. Also mainly young men away from home.
The difference is they had something to do. Maybe that's what Piddington needs, get the drill sergeant to come and stay.

Edited

Ok so you’re a yes to a 1000 plus men, not families, waiting for asylum? Ok nothing wrong with that but they may as well be placed where people feel as you do.

probablyamunreasonable · Yesterday 14:03

cowasballerina · Yesterday 13:58

Yes how will the area be ruined? The men won't be in the village proper. As a pp says, they will be managed onsite, with transport provided for trips to the nearest town.

I’m guessing some are worried about the impact on their house prices.

GodDamnitDonut · Yesterday 14:03

PissedOffInPiddington · Yesterday 13:45

Not for me, not for my friends. It has got to the point now that we are trying to link up with America and become the 51st state and no longer be part of England.

The area will be ruined if this goes ahead. Totally ruined. I have so much anger for our new PM.

Do you have any active petitions against this decision that we can help with signing?

probablyamunreasonable · Yesterday 14:06

GodDamnitDonut · Yesterday 14:03

Do you have any active petitions against this decision that we can help with signing?

But if they’re not in Piddington they would just be moved somewhere else in the country into another community.

Asunciondelaflata · Yesterday 14:07

cowasballerina · Yesterday 13:58

Yes how will the area be ruined? The men won't be in the village proper. As a pp says, they will be managed onsite, with transport provided for trips to the nearest town.

So they won't hang around the area, but just wait for the bus to take them somewhere else?
Unlikely.

Catterbat · Yesterday 14:08

Asunciondelaflata · Yesterday 12:13

Perhaps house them in areas where people voted for the Green Party, because they do support more migration and open borders.

Presumably you’re aware that ‘in areas that vote green’, not everyone in that area would’ve voted green. I laughed my arse off at Nigel saying he’d build the asylum centres in green areas, at the thought of all their reform-voting neighbours suddenly realising what they’d voted for.

GodDamnitDonut · Yesterday 14:09

probablyamunreasonable · Yesterday 14:06

But if they’re not in Piddington they would just be moved somewhere else in the country into another community.

Then people need to protest again and again until the government understands that the nation will no longer put up with it.

Asunciondelaflata · Yesterday 14:10

Catterbat · Yesterday 14:08

Presumably you’re aware that ‘in areas that vote green’, not everyone in that area would’ve voted green. I laughed my arse off at Nigel saying he’d build the asylum centres in green areas, at the thought of all their reform-voting neighbours suddenly realising what they’d voted for.

Yes. I am aware of that. I do know that there wasn't 100% vote for any party in any constituency. I was just making a point.
I'm glad you find Farage amusing. I find him loathsome.
We're all different.

moonraker0 · Yesterday 14:12

Tiggy2000 · Yesterday 12:26

How do you propose we afford to house people in the leafy villages? A three bedroomed house in my area is £450k plus to buy and £1800 pcm to rent, except there aren’t any homes to rent, none. This is the case in many areas. Zero rentals available. Are they going to commandeer the village Hall!

A three bedroom house in your area will soon be a lot less than £450k once they move in. All it takes is one or two and you instantly become a less desirable area, exactly like we have already in the working class areas.