Sex offender granted asylum?

[cordeliachaseatemyhandbag]

Given the other thread was deleted I'm assuming we aren't allowed to talk about the ongoing criminal incident/investigation.

However it's the top story on the bbc news that a convicted sex offender was granted asylum then has gone on to seemingly commit another violent offence.

Surely there should be a blanket ban on convicted sex offenders being granted asylum?

Just goes to show, men can basically get away with anything.

International law shouldnt t allow the small boats but if the Tories are out at next GE there is NO WAY Labour will be able to do anything else. The lefties in Labour Party will potentially make it much worse. We approve what 70% of applications. Other European countries much much less. Just why, with no paperwork, no proof nothing. We are seen as a massive soft touch and we always seem to give people the benefit of the doubt (again and again).

There is no way he has left the country. He has burns on his face, bit of a giveaway at passport control.

Maybe he should've thought about that before he committed a sexual offence.

Why on earth wasn't he deported after his claim was denied the first time? The government is at fault for this.

@IClaudine love the fact you think he'd escape via an airport and rock up at passport control

Because the asylum system allows endless rounds of appeals and he would have had a legal aid lawyer fighting his corner. An utter disgrace.

That's really not possible without massive amount of money. He ia not some oligarch

How else is he going to get out of the country if not via air or sea? As a pp said he's hardly going to be able to leave via private jet or yacht.

I wonder what is the evidence they found at the addresses in the investigation? Still at large. What a joke!

So true

There is another thread about the NHS going on on mumsnet

As usual, @lostonmars the rights of women and girls to safety come well below any man's rights and desires.

Country is so soft

I don't think asylum should be granted to criminals full stop.

Especially not when they have committed those crimes after they have arrived in the country where they wish to claim asylum. I don't mean this to apply just to the UK either, but any country in which asylum seekers arrive.

They should be immediately expelled.

When you keep importing the third world, these are the consequences. Europe has signed its own demise.

You can give anyone a chance but once they commit a crime they should not be granted license to stay here. End of story.

You can see why leaving the ECHR is gaining traction on the right. Human rights lawyers are morally bankrupt piss takers and will use any loophole to keep all manner of criminals and degenerates in this country, while raking in the cash for it.

I'm sick to death of human rights lawyers prioritising violent criminals and rapists at the expense of law abiding, innocent citizens. All of this is just a massive recruitment campaign for the hard right because the liberals//lefties/centrists/Tories refuse to listen.

@IClaudine well he got here in the first place on a lorry so I'm sure he's pretty resourceful

It's ridiculous that any offence does not require immediate deportation! What message are we sending out? In particular a sex offence and being on the sex offenders register. Who cares if you convert to a religion afterwards. Why should you be helped by the state? I mean I know being a sex offender doesn't ban you from the church but what the actual f@ck is going on in the country.

And to make a further mockery of the system, the civil service has today decided Turkey isn't safe enough to have a returns agreement.

Turkey. Where half the UK go on holiday every year. And which is a signatory to the ECHR.

It's almost as if our civil service and government don't want to solve the immigration problem...

The public are sick to death of human rights lawyers, raking in cash by keeping violent criminals, rapists and other scum from justice. Tories will be using Starmer's past as one of these lawyers as a line of attack in election year.

The civil service don't set the law and the rules. The government do.

Men are convicted far more for the same crime than women are, as an average, and for longer.

This isn't a gender issue, it's the county and it's soft as fuck mentality, weak laws and the hold human rights lawyers have over the asylum and immigration system.