Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Archie Battersbee - Thread 3

1000 replies

BongoJim · 31/07/2022 22:06

Follow on from previous full thread

www.mumsnet.com/talk/in_the_news/4596573-archie-battersebee-case-thread-2?page=1

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
MayThe4th · 01/08/2022 16:17

HinchcliffeandMurgatroyd · 01/08/2022 16:15

The courts are bending over backwards to be reasonable , to give the parents every hearing, and to be seen to do both those things.

If they’d stuck with a withdrawal time to day, it would have been very rushed, so they’ve gone with an option that at least provides the possibility of calm and dignity. I hope the family can make the mental shift overnight and that the so-called “army” stand down.

And every time they give any kind of leeway there is yet another appeal, which they allow, and then they delay the withdrawal a bit longer,and then there’s another appeal.

The court process at this point has been totally meaningless.

LetsGoFlyAKiteee · 01/08/2022 16:19

Appealing seems pointless at this stage. Unless something major different is presented I can't see the outcome being different. Gives her more time but if she's in court that's time away from him. Lucky he hasn't passed by himself really without them being there

Quia · 01/08/2022 16:20

MayThe4th · 01/08/2022 13:58

That depends though. Barts trust already have legal authority to end Archie’s treatment. f the court rules against maintaining treatment then Bart’s can remove treatment immediately.

They’ve already been to the Supreme Court, so that avenue is no longer open to them.

If the hospital has any sense they’ll remove the life support the instant the ruling is granted to prevent any more of this.

They haven't been to the Supreme Court about this particular issue, however.

1blossomtree · 01/08/2022 16:20

BongoJim · 01/08/2022 16:17

Here we go round in circles again.....

Joshua Rozenberg
@JoshuaRozenberg
·
2m
Lady Justice King and Lord Justice Moylan agree.

Court adjourned until 4.30pm so parents can be advised on possibility of a further appeal to the Supreme Court.

This is madness.

How can the parents bear it?

Another time set for tomorrow, another potential hearing in the morning?

HinchcliffeandMurgatroyd · 01/08/2022 16:20

MayThe4th · 01/08/2022 16:17

And every time they give any kind of leeway there is yet another appeal, which they allow, and then they delay the withdrawal a bit longer,and then there’s another appeal.

The court process at this point has been totally meaningless.

Actually I think it’s kind of necessary that they are allowed to exhaust the process if that’s what they’re intent on. Not ideal at all and I wish for everyone’s sakes they would stop now, but if exhausting the process is what it takes for justice to be seen to be done, then so be it.

BongoJim · 01/08/2022 16:22

Quia · 01/08/2022 16:20

They haven't been to the Supreme Court about this particular issue, however.

Given the reason for the previous appeal is it not possible the supreme court may dismiss any further appeals because the outcome is still the same?

OP posts:
70isaLimitNotaTarget · 01/08/2022 16:25

Hollie made several references to the anxiety she was suffering ( interview this morning about 7am) , anxiety in her chest .

Then she did an interview for BBC4

And there's a planned interview with Jeremy Kyle on TalkTV at 6pm.

It would really really be in her est interest to cancel the Kyle interview , the stress might be harmful to her (is she prophesising that like Paul she is going to have an episode of stress induced ill health ? )
Talking to JK , she's likely to blow a gasket

SunflowerGardens · 01/08/2022 16:26

MayThe4th · 01/08/2022 16:07

Someone said upthread though that they can still appeal to the Supreme Court?

They'd need to do it quickly 😬

BongoJim · 01/08/2022 16:28

The wording only speaks of the possibility of supreme court. They may not actually be given a hearing if any further appeals are dismissed.

OP posts:
DoubleShotEspresso · 01/08/2022 16:28

Let's hope the Supreme Court appeal is refused.
Horrific case and I feel hugely for the family but this serves nobody least of all that poor boy-I hope they take some time privately now to grieve and absorb the realities here.

ChocolateCakeYum · 01/08/2022 16:29

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-62376552

I hope now the poor lad can rest in peace, dragging this out any longer and going on chat shows etc is helping no-one. She should spend the last few moments with her son, not Jezza Kyle.

Quia · 01/08/2022 16:31

Sistanotcista · 01/08/2022 14:07

Exactly this. And I do feel that a little more effort could have put into the letter. In such difficult times it is not unreasonable for the family to expect a letter that actually gets the dates correct, and spells "coroner" correctly. This really comes across as having been dashed off in a hurry, with no thought to the impact the words, and the utter carelessness displayed in the lack of attention to detail, would make the family feel.

I, too, am with the medical experts and the courts, but my heart absolutely goes out to the family at this terrible time, and I feel that Barts Health could have been a whole lot more compassionate. They are not helping themselves, as I can see how those opposing the withdrawal of medical care could quite easily say that sufficient care and attention to detail has not been displayed. If Barts can't even write an accurate letter, how can the family believe that the far more serious decisions have been considered accurately and proportionately?

I completely agree they should have checked the letter properly, but I don't see how you can deduce that they haven't been acting compassionately just from that alone. Hollie herself keeps saying that the nurses and most of the doctors have been wonderful.

From what I can see, they really have been going above and beyond to keep Archie going. The whole process is really on a knife edge - they may work like Trojans to get the right balance with one system, only for something else to give up or deteriorate and throw all their calculations out. They're giving 24 hour care which involves multiple interventions and dedicating a very expensive ICU room and bed to him. On top of dealing with all the grief from AA and accusations of being murderers and executioners. They could well have been less careful and just allowed him to deteriorate so much that all of this might have been over weeks ago, but they haven't done that.

BreadInCaptivity · 01/08/2022 16:31

70isaLimitNotaTarget · 01/08/2022 16:25

Hollie made several references to the anxiety she was suffering ( interview this morning about 7am) , anxiety in her chest .

Then she did an interview for BBC4

And there's a planned interview with Jeremy Kyle on TalkTV at 6pm.

It would really really be in her est interest to cancel the Kyle interview , the stress might be harmful to her (is she prophesising that like Paul she is going to have an episode of stress induced ill health ? )
Talking to JK , she's likely to blow a gasket

However many interviews she does will not change the decision of the Court.

I can't fathom why she'd want to be spending time doing anything other than being with Archie at this point.

I genuinely hope she's not being influenced by CLC to do these interviews.

MrsLargeEmbodied · 01/08/2022 16:36

it sounds like the end of the road has been reached. according to bbc news i have just watched.

LetsGoFlyAKiteee · 01/08/2022 16:37

Think been given permission to appeal to the supreme Court...

RunningFromInsanity · 01/08/2022 16:37

She’s going to be known as the mother that did a Jeremy Kyle interview instead of spending the last moments with her dying son.

In a year or so time she is going to be so ashamed of her actions. And it’s the fault of those disgusting groups taking advantage of a mothers instinct to keep her child alive at any cost.

MayThe4th · 01/08/2022 16:40

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

HinchcliffeandMurgatroyd · 01/08/2022 16:40

BreadInCaptivity · 01/08/2022 16:31

However many interviews she does will not change the decision of the Court.

I can't fathom why she'd want to be spending time doing anything other than being with Archie at this point.

I genuinely hope she's not being influenced by CLC to do these interviews.

People absorb these ideas and tropes from pop culture; That in a crisis, publicity matters, for example. The McCanns fell victim to the same instinct. It must be hard to think straight when you’re extremely distressed, even for educated people who deal with emergencies at work.

70isaLimitNotaTarget · 01/08/2022 16:41

BreadInCaptivity · 01/08/2022 16:31

However many interviews she does will not change the decision of the Court.

I can't fathom why she'd want to be spending time doing anything other than being with Archie at this point.

I genuinely hope she's not being influenced by CLC to do these interviews.

Ah no , I was roundabout clumsily musing that as she has reached the end of the cul-de-sac maybe the only thing that would stop the withdrawel is if SHE was in hospital herself .
They are not going to be a callous as to switch everything off if she is too ill to be there herself .
Maybe she sees it as the only way (and she can blame the sress on the way she's been treated )

I wonder how many times she'll mention her stress and her anxiety if she goes on JK ?
I mean she can do the interview from Archies bedside so still be with him (as she claims she never leaves his side Hmm )

LetsGoFlyAKiteee · 01/08/2022 16:43

Permission to appeal declined but they can appeal directly is what's being reported.

BongoJim · 01/08/2022 16:45

Sir Andrew McFarlane, presiding over the case at the Court of Appeal, said the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which the UN committee based its request on, is an "unincorporated international treaty".

He said: "It is not part of the law of the United Kingdom... and it is not appropriate for this court to apply an unincorporated international treaty into its decision-making process."

"Every day that (Archie) continues to be given life-sustaining treatment is contrary to his best interests and, so, a stay, even for a short time, is against his best interests," he added.

Sir Andrew said Archie's case was "stark" as "his system, his organs and, ultimately, his heart are in the process of closing down".

Sky News

OP posts:
BreadInCaptivity · 01/08/2022 16:48

AFAIK the hospital would legally be obliged to comply with the Court, even if Hollie could not/refused to be there.

I've not seen anything about the Supreme Court yet, but if they choose to go that route it's because they have a legal right to do so.

As pp's have said, whilst people may not agree with that course of action, it's important that justice is not only done but seen to be done.

BongoJim · 01/08/2022 16:48

Joshua Rozenberg
@JoshuaRozenberg
·
5m
Archie’s parents have been refused permission to appeal to the
@UKSupremeCourt
but they can ask that court for permission at a hearing expected tomorrow.

OP posts:
loislovesstewie · 01/08/2022 16:48

I agree with the poster who said that we aren't used to children dying these days. Until recently in human history, families would have been used to the young dying and would have been distraught but accepting of the death of a young person, now it feels that we don't understand that sadly medicine can only go so far. Keeping oxygen in the body to allow the heart to breathe isn't living. And also of course there are those who 'wake up' from comas apparently and continue with their lives , which really gives false hope in cases like this.
Sadly, I think that instead of relying on medical knowledge, this case has been hijacked for other purposes. I spent about 30 minutes looking at other cases that this religious group have assisted in taking to court and,quite frankly, I was shocked by the thinking behind them. I could say more but won't .

BreadInCaptivity · 01/08/2022 16:49

BongoJim · 01/08/2022 16:48

Joshua Rozenberg
@JoshuaRozenberg
·
5m
Archie’s parents have been refused permission to appeal to the
@UKSupremeCourt
but they can ask that court for permission at a hearing expected tomorrow.

I'm utterly bemused by what that actually means....

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.