[quote user1497207191]**@dreamingbohemian* So the priority is definitely to have face to face for seminars -- that's what students want the most. They definitely seem less bothered about the huge lectures being online.*
Has there been proper research and student's surveyed in a properly organised/managed questionnaire for that assertion?[/quote]
In my department we have done a massive amount of engagement with students all year -- surveys, focus groups, regular meetings with student reps, you name it. The overwhelming message is that they want the social side of things to reopen and they want f2f seminars/discussions. That is what will happen in September.
When we ask about large lectures online, there is a small minority that is unhappy about this and the rest are split between people who prefer online and people who are not bothered either way.
Our plan is to have large lectures online in Term 1 and hopefully f2f in Term 2. Believe me, we are all desperate to get back to f2f.
The problem is that all the arrangements for September need to be done now and the government has still not said for sure what restrictions might be in place then. If we still have to have social distancing (which has not been decided for sure) then large lectures will be almost impossible. So universities are being cautious for Term 1 at least.
My university has 30,000 students across 300 courses and 5 campuses. It's very difficult to make quick and last-minute decisions, so people are being cautious. Universities made a lot of bad decisions last year under pressure and no one wants to do that again.