To the people who say that unvaccinated children should be excluded from schools - which vaccines would you apply this to, and what reasons would you allow for children to be unvaccinated? Who would decide?
The government, the same as many governments already do. In Ontario, not having the flu vaccine won’t make you ineligible for school, but the other pre-school-age vaccines in the Canadian schedule (including varicella) are required to attend public schools. France (11 on the list), Italy (10), Australia, many US states - this is a fairly common approach.
People live in a community. They want to avail themselves of the good things that come with being part of that community, as well as abiding by its requirements (pay taxes, wear seat belts, don’t talk on mobile phones while driving, avoid hurting other people, etc).
When there are clear and safe - as safe as possible, with the risks of harm very low indeed and many times lower than the risks of the diseases they prevent - ways of not only preventing an individual from getting ill, but also lowering incidence of disease in the community as a whole, it is reasonable for the community to consider whether some of the benefits of living in the community are contingent upon doing some of the things that are beneficial to the community in return.
My child did not receive the rotavirus vaccine. He had been suffering badly from colic/something and had bloody poo, and after reading about the risk of gastro-intestinal side-effects, I didn't think I would cope with the anxiety. He wasn't medically ineligible though. Should he be excluded from schools now?
That sounds grim - what was the doctor’s advice? Rotavirus is not on many compulsory vaccine lists (if any - I haven’t done an exhaustive check!) - I imagine because it is one of the rare ones where you can’t remedy missing the vaccine as a newborn by going through a catch up programme.