Gileswithachainsaw
There is a vaccine damage payment from government. There is a small risk that vaccines can cause brain damage, the same there is if you take any medicine or have any medical procedure.
No scheme has paid out for a vaccine causing autism with the exception of one case in Italy where the child has a whole host of medical problems including autism and the court could not pinpoint which medical problems were caused by vaccine, which by inappropriate medical treatment and which were idiopathic. The court therefore gave compensation for all the child's needs. This has been jumped on by the anti vax groups as 'proof' of autism caused by vaccine.
They will have the rubella at 13 like I did. Not as a baby. How bloody pointless.
Er I don't understand this, rubella is usually mild, the danger is to a foetus if the mother contracts it, so the only reason to have it is if you are going to be pregnant - to protect your child, or if you are likely to come in to contact with pregnant women and again it is to protect their child. So why 13?
Some people have very good reasons to not vaccinate, like the poster up thread who's child had a bad reaction. Some people cannot have vaccines grown in eggs because they have an egg allergy.
I have no problem with anyone in that category.
I have a problem with bad reasons, the worst I have heard is,"It makes them cry and I don't like it".
So the medical establishment and GPs must change in how they approach the vaccine issue
Medicine is a science, and science changes when new things are discovered so it might be that at the time vaccines were contraindicated for you medical conditions but later studies have shown no problem. Also the vaccines themselves change. Given your age if you had polio vaccine it was probably on a sugar cube, now it is jab, then it was a live vaccine, now it isn't.