https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/articles/natureofsexualassaultbyrapeorpenetrationenglandandwales/yearendingmarch2020#amount-and-type-of-sexual-assault-experienced
“For the years ending March 2017 and March 2020 combined, victims who experienced sexual assault by rape or penetration since the age of 16 years were most likely to be victimised by their partner or ex-partner (44%). This was closely followed by someone who was known to them other than a partner or family member (37%), which includes friends (12%) and dates (10%)”
So no, when you have this many people being raped by someone they know what they are wearing has absolutely nothing to do with it.
Rape isn’t about sex. There has been an abundance of research into the psychology of rapists and it has nothing whatsoever to do with what their victim was wearing.
For example “specialist rapists” are people who are aroused by the lack of consent. “Partner rapists” tend to rape as a form of punishment towards their partner. “High mating effort rapists” are what today we’d call incels. They believe they are owed sex if they pay for meal. Btw the last two are more common in more conservative countries where women dress more modestly because culturally woman are seen as they’re partners property. So your random assessment that rape occurs less in Middle Eastern countries is unsubstantiated. In many of these countries rape within a marriage isn’t a crime and sex outside a marriage is. So unmarried women who are raped don’t report it as they themselves can be accused of “zina” and end up in prison. It’s the most common reason for women to be imprisoned in these countries. In Afghanistan it’s 95% of women who are imprisoned for “zina”
There are life factors that make someone more likely to rape. For example someone who experienced abuse of any kind as a child is 5 x more likely to become a rapist. Alcoholics are 2.6 x more likely to commit rape. Some subject to adult trauma, such as war, is 2.5 x more likely to rape.
As for children…this is a an odd dichotomy. People like the woman in your first Tik Tok are under the false impression that children wearing “revealing” or “sexualised” clothing puts them at great risk of assault, but it doesn’t. It is highly unpleasant to think about but research into pedophilia has shown that these people like kids who look like kids. They are attracted to their childishness. They are attracted to their innocence. So an 8 year old who dresses like a 16 year old isn’t what they want. They want an 8 year old.
You can find interviews with pedophiles where they talk about becoming disgusted with a child they were assaulting as soon as signs of puberty started to show. Sprouting breasts and widening hips are not what they are looking for.
Pedophiles tend to go for children in a very specific age range and it is usually the age they were when they started to be assaulted themselves. Their sexuality never matures beyond that point. You don’t tend to see pedophiles who assault 13 year old girls and 5 year old girls. They have a “type”. Those who don’t have a “type”, such as Ian Brady, show signs that what they are aroused by is sexual deviancy rather than the child themselves. It’s the knowing that they are doing something deplorable.
But sure let’s reduce all this down to short skirts.