@WhiteWriting I’m a barrister:
Indications - So yes the judge at the hearing (but usually only if parties ask) will give you an “indication” of what they think would happen at final hearing on issues. So say a couple are fighting about how to divide equity in a property the judge will give an indication of what they think would happen at a final hearing.
Different judges have different styles. Some are more interventionist and will ask for list of issues in dispute and then give indications. Others will only do so if asked.
Judge may have read everything beforehand (sometimes not everything gets to them). That’s why your barrister is doing a position statement, it effectively sign posts judge to key documents they should look at.
Phone/Zoom - won’t be zoom. Courts not allowed to do zoom. For an FDR highly likely will be phone (probably something called BTMeetMe). If judge wants to use video it will likely be Skype, Teams or CVP, but then court will check if everyone has access to that.
www.gov.uk/guidance/how-to-join-telephone-and-video-hearings-during-coronavirus-covid-19-outbreak
The above is a good link to all the different remote hearings courts are using.
Finally, FDR can not be used as a final hearing. The judge dealing with the FDR can not conduct the final hearing. No notes from the FDR can be on the file. This is to ensure parties feel free to make offers/concessions etc without it being used against them at a final hearing.
Don’t worry about the questions. Court is stressful enough and this throws another layer into the mix. Although I know a lot of people actually prefer remote hearings cause then they don’t have to see their ex!