Please or to access all these features

Craicnet
Thread gallery
78
MaeveofConnaught · 18/07/2026 19:30

It's not really surprising that Butler is embracing the Icelandic model. She was never going to go with Cass really, was she?
Is Ahern (he/him) being lined up to replace Donal O'Shea?

OP posts:
deeahgwitch · 18/07/2026 19:44

UtopiaPlanitia · 18/07/2026 18:53

This government won’t be content until it has run completely in the opposite direction (at 100 mph) to the newly-drafted PB policies instituted by all sensible countries.

They seem incapable of seeing the huge future problems they’ll be causing and, of course, as always happens in this country, not a one of them will ever take the blame or face any consequences for what they’re doing.

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
There will be no accountability that’s for sure.

MarieDeGournay · 05/08/2026 19:07

LifeInAHamsterWheel · 05/08/2026 18:00

Link

Tis backwards we're going...

Grim, isn't it? Holding on to outdated trans policies although most sporting bodies in Ireland have asserted that the women's category = female at birth.

I wonder how much support it has at grassroots level.

It's a good article, isn't it? I don't read the Indo much, but I should support it
because it seems to be a bastion of objectivity and realism on sex/gender.

This gives me a chance to post that famous photo of Giulia Valentino bravely representing transwomen in the GAA.
Giulia [who seems to have disappeared back to Italy, or London] said in interviews at the time that Giulia wished to leave a legacy for transwomen in the GAA.
Happy to oblige at every opportunity by posting your photo, Giulia, the more people see it, the stronger your 'legacy' will be!

Gender Critical in Ireland Part 4
MaeveofConnaught · 05/08/2026 19:14

LifeInAHamsterWheel · 05/08/2026 18:00

Link

Tis backwards we're going...

I often wonder why the LGFA pushed through their transgender policy. It wasn't something that would have been widely supported at grassroots level.
Someone high up with a trans child or relative perhaps?
We see similar with certain prominent politicians.
My understanding is that the LGFA adopted the 2015 IOC guidelines when they threw female players under the bus in the name of kindness and inclusion.

As the more recent IOC policy finally decided to prioritise safety and fairness in womens sports, we can only hope there will be enough senior members of the GAA and Camogie Association who will have the sense to recognise that continuing with the current LGFA position after amalgamation,leaves them very vulnerable to liability claims.

OP posts:
LifeInAHamsterWheel · 05/08/2026 19:34

Well it must have had something to do with higher-ups, AbbVie pharmaceuticals were/are huge sponsors and just so happens they are the biggest producers of puberty blocker medication. There must be a connection there.

With it being such a high contact sport it's only a matter of time until there's a serious injury and that might be the only thing to make anyone take notice. The Gaels for Fair Play group must be so upset with this latest news. They have an even bigger mountain to climb now 😩

mardirousse · 10/08/2026 13:13

according to Leo Varadkar, the reason why "authoritarians" focus on sport is that "they've done the maths". He believes in inclusion in sport!!! and reckons we're best ignored. Sickening. x.com/LOCthedreamer2/status/2086052941035602027

LifeInAHamsterWheel · 10/08/2026 14:24

Ugh I hate the way he's grouping 'activists' and 'human rights defenders' together. It just perpetuates the lie that denying men access to women's spaces and races amounts to a breach of their human rights!! It is infuriating!

Having said that, does anyone actually listen to Leo? Does he have any real clout anymore?

UtopiaPlanitia · 10/08/2026 14:49

Leo reminds me very much of Nicola Sturgeon in that he's desperate to be seen as 'on the right side of history', he continues to want to influence his country's political life even when out of power, and he can't let go of the limelight so he keeps attending events and making fatuous statements about progressive politics.

Sad really.

MarieDeGournay · 03/09/2026 13:14

Has anybody else noticed the absence of any discussion on Craicnet about the ACLI conference inviting a man who supports men 'chestfeeding' babies, for reasons that include 'sexual gratification'?

There a whole thread about it on Feminism:Sex and Gender Discussions
Lactation support conference in Ireland - the quiet part out loud | Mumsnet
and one of the comments made is that there has been very little coverage of it in the Irish mainstream media.

Nor on Craicnet, which is surprising, though anything too close to being too feminist isn't welcome, apart from here in GC In Ireland - I was curtly told to take my feminism elsewhere when I made some remark - a pretty uncontroversial one, I thought - about Conor McGregor when the rape case was going on.

BruachAbhann · 03/09/2026 13:40

MarieDeGournay · 03/09/2026 13:14

Has anybody else noticed the absence of any discussion on Craicnet about the ACLI conference inviting a man who supports men 'chestfeeding' babies, for reasons that include 'sexual gratification'?

There a whole thread about it on Feminism:Sex and Gender Discussions
Lactation support conference in Ireland - the quiet part out loud | Mumsnet
and one of the comments made is that there has been very little coverage of it in the Irish mainstream media.

Nor on Craicnet, which is surprising, though anything too close to being too feminist isn't welcome, apart from here in GC In Ireland - I was curtly told to take my feminism elsewhere when I made some remark - a pretty uncontroversial one, I thought - about Conor McGregor when the rape case was going on.

I think the ACLI conference deserves a thread of its own and it gets more attention on the main GC section. I think some of the posters who post here are also on the other thread. The more coverage the better of course!

It's such a harrowing subject matter. Despite the fact that I've known all about the quiet, insidious capture of Irish institutions, finding out the ACLI (funded by the HSE) have not only allowed but welcomed in a man who promotes 'chest feeding' for men for the purposes of 'curiosity, fun or sexual gratification' is almost too much to bear. Their reaction when called up on it is even more telling; no apologies, no about turns, removing content which showed their dangerous agenda and then brazening it out.

The subject matter is just so shocking. I had to force myself to read some of the articles. We need to know what's going on and push back on it though.

MarieDeGournay · 04/09/2026 09:34

BruachAbhann · 03/09/2026 13:40

I think the ACLI conference deserves a thread of its own and it gets more attention on the main GC section. I think some of the posters who post here are also on the other thread. The more coverage the better of course!

It's such a harrowing subject matter. Despite the fact that I've known all about the quiet, insidious capture of Irish institutions, finding out the ACLI (funded by the HSE) have not only allowed but welcomed in a man who promotes 'chest feeding' for men for the purposes of 'curiosity, fun or sexual gratification' is almost too much to bear. Their reaction when called up on it is even more telling; no apologies, no about turns, removing content which showed their dangerous agenda and then brazening it out.

The subject matter is just so shocking. I had to force myself to read some of the articles. We need to know what's going on and push back on it though.

Yes I agree with all that, including that sometimes Irish stuff 'gets traction' over on the main GC section, which is good, but the crickets and tumbleweed on Craicnet in general, apart from here on the GC thread, is a bit ominous...

It is horrifying to think that an organisation that is all about something as female as breastfeeding even considered getting this man to speak!

The probably thought they had to include fathers/men somehow🙄, but that should surely be around supporting the breastfeeding mother emotionally and practically, not men DIYing it.

And this being 2026 Ireland - 🙄again - they probably felt they had to have something 'gender-y', but they could have done one session - why two? - on different family structures, non-gender-conforming women, that kind of thing.
Why does 'gender diversity' in breastfeeding mean men?

The number of trans people in Ireland is tiny, the number of them who are parents and who wish to breastfeed their [or other people's😖] babies must be single-figures small. Why so much focus on them?

[That's what I think about the JC Curriculum as well - whatever about the ethics and values of it all, why on earth is there a whole section on trans stuff, it's totally disproportionate on a population level.]

I'm wondering how much 'diversity' time and energy was given to, for instance, women with disabilities who might encounter specific difficulties with breastfeeding? I know Cailin66 took a screenshot of the original programme, I must check to see if there was anything about disability.

I did notice that there wasn't a word about disabled access at the venue - wheelchair access, induction loops etc etc. That kind of diversity is out of fashion..

deeahgwitch · 04/09/2026 09:56

Enda Kenny has a lot to answer for imho.
He gave us Leo and Simon Harris (by promoting them). That led to Helen Mc Entee being Justice Minister, God help us.
All nice people I’m sure but……..

honeyrider · 04/09/2026 09:56

Cuidiu is actively promoting chest feeding, another organisation getting tax payer funding.

MarieDeGournay · 04/09/2026 18:34

honeyrider · 04/09/2026 09:56

Cuidiu is actively promoting chest feeding, another organisation getting tax payer funding.

I couldn't find anything about 'chestfeeding' on their actual website, but then this came up
Breastfeeding support group Cuidiú defends ethos of 'supporting parents'

More mealy-mouthed than openly supporting male 'lactation', as far as I can see, but can none of these groups just come out and say that ACLI was wrong to invite, and defend, a speaker who talks about men 'chestfeeding' at all, but worse still doing so for sexual gratification?

If somebody did make actual threats against the Ardilaun Hotel or ACLI participants, they have played into the hands of ACLI playing the DARVO-ing victimhood card. Stupid and counterproductive.

honeyrider · 04/09/2026 20:10

Not the only branch promoting chestfeeding

Gender Critical in Ireland Part 4
Joolsin · 05/09/2026 13:11

Such an ironic address for the Waterford meetings - Lady Lane! 😁

Emilesgran · 05/09/2026 20:29

MarieDeGournay · 04/09/2026 18:34

I couldn't find anything about 'chestfeeding' on their actual website, but then this came up
Breastfeeding support group Cuidiú defends ethos of 'supporting parents'

More mealy-mouthed than openly supporting male 'lactation', as far as I can see, but can none of these groups just come out and say that ACLI was wrong to invite, and defend, a speaker who talks about men 'chestfeeding' at all, but worse still doing so for sexual gratification?

If somebody did make actual threats against the Ardilaun Hotel or ACLI participants, they have played into the hands of ACLI playing the DARVO-ing victimhood card. Stupid and counterproductive.

If somebody did make actual threats against the Ardilaun Hotel or ACLI participants, they have played into the hands of ACLI playing the DARVO-ing victimhood card.

I bet they didn't though - it's just an excuse to save face.

Crunchingleaf · 05/09/2026 21:02

The ACLI just doubled down and of course no sign of the big papers doing an expose on it. Sometimes it’s so depressing but ordinary Irish people in my experience are still reasonable, sensible people. I brought this up in work and people are just so sick it this nonsense.
I believe it got this far because ordinary people thought it was so all ridiculous that it wouldn’t get very far.
We got to keep on talking about all this stuff in real life if we are to push back to sanity.

BruachAbhann · 05/09/2026 21:14

Crunchingleaf · 05/09/2026 21:02

The ACLI just doubled down and of course no sign of the big papers doing an expose on it. Sometimes it’s so depressing but ordinary Irish people in my experience are still reasonable, sensible people. I brought this up in work and people are just so sick it this nonsense.
I believe it got this far because ordinary people thought it was so all ridiculous that it wouldn’t get very far.
We got to keep on talking about all this stuff in real life if we are to push back to sanity.

Deafening silence from the mainstream media alright.
I saw a post on twitter explaining that apparently Ireland AM did their usual summary of the newspaper headlines of the Irish Daily mail again today.
' Unlike yesterday or last Saturday when, without explanation, it was omitted. Those two days IDM led on "chestfeeding" controversy. They don't want their viewers to know about that.'

Crunchingleaf · 05/09/2026 21:38

BruachAbhann · 05/09/2026 21:14

Deafening silence from the mainstream media alright.
I saw a post on twitter explaining that apparently Ireland AM did their usual summary of the newspaper headlines of the Irish Daily mail again today.
' Unlike yesterday or last Saturday when, without explanation, it was omitted. Those two days IDM led on "chestfeeding" controversy. They don't want their viewers to know about that.'

The Soviet’s would be proud of modern day Irelands propaganda.

Orders76 · 05/09/2026 23:15

Covered by brenda power in the times, but not an Irish outlet

Genesis1v27 · 04/10/2026 09:40

In April, Brenda Power wrote a piece for the Sunday Independent titled Nameless TD who vouched for a paedophile owes us all an explanation.

It contained the sentence "Incidentally, if this TD is from one of the parties that so blithely insist no man would identify as a woman with predatory motives, I’d like to hear them explain, in the light of this case, why such behaviour is so unthinkable."

The Press Council of Ireland has upheld a complaint about that sentence being prejudiced against a protected group.

https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/a-woman-and-the-sunday-independent/a/162430886.html

MarieDeGournay · 04/10/2026 11:16

I sort-of see the point made by the ombudsman - even if it's entirely true that some transIDing men use that to get access to vulnerable children, that's not what happened in the case in question, and I can see that bringing transwomen into the article was a bit arbitrary.

But where the ombudsman - I see they are using -person now - gets it wrong I think is to think that a male is any less likely to be a sexual predator just because he has a protected characteristic .

The Press Ombudsperson finds that this inevitably creates a doubt that is likely to colour the mind of a reader encountering any or all trans persons whose assigned sex at birth was male. It is suggested that it would be naïve and irresponsible not to consider that such a person might be a sexual predator. The article offers no evidence to justify instilling this doubt.

It would indeed be naïve and irresponsible not to consider that such a person might be a sexual predator, because male people commit the majority of sexual predation.

I can see that people have an issue at the suggestion that transID-ing men are more likely than other men to be sexual predators, which is why I sort-of 'get' the ruling.

But there's nothing wrong with considering trans-IDing men just as likely as other men to commit sexual offences.
There is an argument to be made that some men identify as women in order to get access to children - the case a few months back of the TW worker who tried to kiss little kids raised red flags for everybody concerned.
There is an argument to be made that in the UK transIDing males appear to be more likely to commit sexual offences, not even 'just as likely' as other men.

An analysis of UK crime figures calculated that
1 in 2,205 men commit and are convicted of a sexual offence.
1 in 626 transwomen commit and are convicted of a sexual offence.
compared to men, transwomen are 252% more likely to commit and be convicted of a sexual offence.
What actually is the risk posed by men who want to be women? | Women's Rights Network | UK

In March 2026, there were around 83,881 men in prison in the UK
UK Prison Statistics 2026: Key Data & Trends | Novus
15,897 were convicted of sexual offences.
That's about 19% of the male prison population.

A statement in the UK Parliament stated that
23 December 2024
Of the 245 transgender prisoners who reported their legal gender as male (i.e. those who now identify as women, non-binary or gender-fluid) on 31 March 2024, 151 were convicted of a sexual offence. This includes both contact and non-contact sexual offences. Offence data was not available for 1 individual.
Written questions and answers - Written questions, answers and statements - UK Parliament

That's about 62% of the trans-IDng male prison population in 2024, I couldn't find more recent figures.

Those are just my own rough calculations, I'm sure more expert, and numerate! people than me have published more reliable and completely up-to-date figures.

The point is, not only may it not be 'naïve and irresponsible not to consider that such a person might be a sexual predator,' the statistics appear to show that a man who IDs as a woman is statistically more likely to commit a sexual offence than a man who does not ID as a woman.

Which is not saying all transwomen are sexual predators, that would be wrong, and I can see that it is unacceptable to suggest that.

But there's nothing wrong with saying that there is good evidence that transwomen commit sexual offences not just as often as other men, but statistically more often than other men.

I think the Ombudsperson should be challenged on that general point.
Also 'assigned male at birth' is, like, soooooo 2020!🙄

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread