That's OK, MaeveofConnaught, you know what they say about New York, New York 'so good they named it twice' so that makes me super-dooper
Thanks for posting this, I hadn't seen it. As one commentator says, 'A biologist believing that ‘trans women are women’ is like an astronomer believing the earth is flat.'
I'm outraged, of course, but also a bit sad that a successful, obviously intelligent, woman who has done a lot of researching and reading and analysing of complex ideas is so overwhelmed by #bekind that it clouds her ability to even use language correctly:
“Science doesn’t tell us right and wrong, we have to figure that out ourselves. My rule: above all, be kind. Trans women are women.”
She is mis-using the words 'right and wrong', she's using them in the moral sense; she is right, science doesn't tell us what is morally or ethically right or wrong. But the other meaning of those words is 'correct and incorrect' or 'factual or non-factual', and that's exactly what science is about.
And what she should be about, as a scientist.
I look at this and I lose the respect that I would otherwise have for her.
There aren't many women who become Chair of Evolutionary Genetics in a prestigious university, fair play to her, so it's sad that she can also be such an eejit.