This thread explains quite well the differing scenarios in the modelling - could be 75,000 deaths, could also be 24,000 at most optimistic.
twitter.com/BarnardResearch/status/1469646833563615237?t=IbUj3bnDJiQghpgH977BSw&s=19
There's a lot of differing information but from what I can see most scientists are taking the cautious approach and waiting for more detail. John Burn Murdoch is an excellent Twitter follow on the developing situation.
I don't understand why people keep on quoting the WHO statement about no deaths from almost two weeks ago. Things change every day. Omicron is dominant in SA and there are deaths every day - and the question of the excess deaths too which are odd. I just think we need time.
Being cautious about it doesn't make scientists lockdown lovers as many here would so intelligently claim; it simply makes them sensible. If something is coming that looks like it could be catastrophic, do you just block up your ears and hope, minimising everything in sight to fit your narrative, or do you put in mitigations to prevent it to the best extent you can?
I think the pp who talked about people normalising covid deaths was right. Covid fatigue has set in to an extent that people have dehumanised those dying (they did this from early on.) And they ignore those dying because of the knock on effects to eg on cancer treatment.
And none of this whole 'its only mild, who cares' talk takes long covid into account at all. But that's pretty normal and expected, as someone with long term chronic illness I'm used to the minimising.