[quote Battenburg77]@rainrainraincamedowndowndown
There are definitely people who were previously healthy and now have a dramatically diminished quality of life since having the vaccine. Many of them are paying thousands for their own medical bills and struggling to access compensation. It might be a minority, but where there is risk there needs to be choice.
Aside from that, it really is the principle that's important. If you take away someone's right to even decide what goes into their body, you've stripped them of dignity and autonomy. There are other low-risk medical inventions that we don't force on people - eg, smear tests. Those save lives too. Should they be enforced with fines? By the same logic they should be, surely.[/quote]
Is the right to decide what goes into your body particularly fundamental compared to other rights?
There was also a lot of suffering as a result of lockdowns (certainly more than is caused by vaccines). Does that mean people should have had the right to opt out of lockdowns?
I don't think you can make a good case for compensation, because the risks of the virus exceed the risks of the vaccine. I don't think we can't predict who will have a bad case of covid and who will have a bad reaction to the vaccine. We only know that in aggregate they save lives and reduce illness. People are killed by airbags and seatbelts, but in aggregate they save lives. Is it unjust to fine people for not wearing seatbelts if in some cases they would be safer not wearing one?
I don't think the same argument could be made for smear tests, as they aren't testing for contagious diseases. Maybe an analogous case is sexually transmitted diseases. Should people be fined for having unprotected sex, unless both partners have tested negative for STDs?