[quote lightand]@ollyollyoxenfree
*Video number 2 is actually Bill Gates himself from 2010 www.ted.com/talks/bill_gates_innovating_to_zero/transcript
He's talking about slowing population growth (which doesn't equal killing people) by providing better medical care, sanitation and access to contraceptive to developing countries, as it is well know that in countries with high infant mortality, families tend to have lots of children.
@lightand why don't you look into this yourself rather than repeating conspiracy theories??*
that is not what he said!
Why dont you do the looking up![/quote]
@lightand
I have literally shared the video you're claiming BG said "three million people must die", when if you watch it, he clearly does not
The intro:
I'm going to talk today about energy and climate. And that might seem a bit surprising, because my full-time work at the foundation is mostly about vaccines and seeds, about the things that we need to invent and deliver to help the poorest two billion live better lives. But energy and climate are extremely important to these people; in fact, more important than to anyone else on the planet. The climate getting worse means that many years, their crops won't grow: there will be too much rain, not enough rain; things will change in ways their fragile environment simply can't support. And that leads to starvation, it leads to uncertainty, it leads to unrest. So, the climate changes will be terrible for them.
Now, we put out a lot of carbon dioxide every year -- over 26 billion tons. For each American, it's about 20 tons. For people in poor countries, it's less than one ton. It's an average of about five tons for everyone on the planet. And somehow, we have to make changes that will bring that down to zero. It's been constantly going up. It's only various economic changes that have even flattened it at all, so we have to go from rapidly rising to falling, and falling all the way to zero.
This equation has four factors, a little bit of multiplication. So you've got a thing on the left, CO2, that you want to get to zero, and that's going to be based on the number of people, the services each person is using on average, the energy, on average, for each service, and the CO2 being put out per unit of energy. So let's look at each one of these, and see how we can get this down to zero. Probably, one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty near to zero.
And here's the bit anti-vaxxers are using to spread misinformation
First, we've got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent. But there, we see an increase of about 1.3.
As I said, he's talking about slowing population growth (which doesn't equal killing people) by providing better medical care, sanitation and access to contraceptive to developing countries, as it is well know that in countries with high infant mortality, families tend to have lots of children.
So where exactly is the point where he talks about "mass genocide" using vaccines?