We have two tiered society right now, with clinically vulnerable people being asked to shield for months on end.
I think unvaccinated people (through choice) may inadvertently add themselves to the group who have to shield. Time will tell.
This is an interesting thread which brings up the clash of rights between
people who choose not to have the vaccine (and their right to choose whether to have a medical intervention)
and the rights of clinically vulnerable people who would be protected through herd immunity (and their right to access basics of society e.g. schooling)
The problem in the pandemic is that the world is connected far more than at different times. Because of the sheer number of hosts/vectors/bodies available to the virus to continue to propagate, one individual’s choice is far more impactful on another’s rights.
I suspect that if a new highly transmissible variant becomes dominant which affects unvaccinated people adversely and there are still enough unvaccinated people around for this to overrun the NHS.....
These two groups will be asked to shield.
One by one, the former group will reassess their risk and slowly get vaccinated, hopefully this will lead to those who are clinically vulnerable being protected by herd immunity and virus levels being brought very low.
I think this could take another year and I feel extremely sorry for those who have no choice and are at the mercy of others’ decisions. Especially children.
I’m not saying the OP or anyone else who chooses not to get vaccinated is wrong. It is their right to choose whether and when to do this. But I believe in a pandemic situation, this is the impact.