My theory is that there is no link. Here are some summary stats so far.
127 specific responses so far, excluding 2 people who only had the jab very recently (< 2 days) & the person who tested positive 3d after jab.
39% type O, 28% type A, 15% type B, 17% type AB
The ABs are way over-represented compared to general population, A & Os are too few. Is there a reason why As & Os aren't on MN or not interested in reporting symptoms/lack thereof? My hunch is people are mistaken about their blood type. IIRC there are always too many ABs reported on MN threads.
There is one blood type that seems to be getting worse symptoms than the others (to my shock). Not hugely worse, but it would pass a Fischer exact test I'll wager if we combine vacc types. Consistent whether Pfizer or AZ (I'm not worrying about rh-factor, btw). Probably sample size is too small (& sampling strategy too biased) to make this observation significant. I don't want to say anything yet, curious what theory OP wants to put forward.
Missing info
@DGRossetti , which jab she & DP had
@ifonly4, @Mollymalone123 which jab their DHs had
@bruffin which jab her sis had
@Harpydragon, @HopingForOurRainbowBaby, @RingtheBells, VienneseWhirligig : which jab any of them had
@garden4569 : blood type