just to follow up on deprivation
First chart plots all Council's take up rates against their IMD 2019 deprivation score, a pattern is there but needs breaking down further.
The second chart therefore shows both the 20% most deprived councils and the 20% least deprived. Over 85% of the former have a take up rate below the median level in England; whilst for the 20% least deprived its just under 25%. Although 1 in 4 of the 20% least deprived is still a perhaps surprising level. The two least deprived outliers are Kingston and Richmond LBCs
The final chart then shows side by side the second most deprived quintile and the second least deprived quintile. For the second least deprived the percentage below the England median is 26%, so not really much higher than that for the least deprived 20%. For the second most deprived quintile 62% below the median.
The red dashed line of each chart indicates the median for overall 50+ age bands.
As we are a data thread:
quickly in terms of Watford: no LSOAs in the most deprived deprivation decile, and 1 of its 53 in the second most deprived decile.
Gig Economy - detailed study a couple of years back found that two thirds of gig economy worked were aged below 35. I'm not convinced that the gig economy is a significant factor in take up rate for those aged from 50 upwards.
high white immigrant population - likely to be disproportionately younger so how much impact on the take up rate in the age 50+ age bands? A bit more data on this would be welcome in order to draw a firm conclusion either way.