@bumbleymummy
Yes, I know studies are being undertaken. Of course it makes sense for people to be vaccinated - if that’s what they want. I just don’t think that natural immunity after recovery should be presented as ‘inferior’ at the moment when actually we know more about it than we do about vaccine induced immunity and all evidence to date has shown that it’s actually very effective - at preventing further infection, and transmission (see earlier link).
The fact that so many people have recovered after infection - including children - and are now contributing to herd immunity as well as our high level of vaccine uptake is a good thing. We don’t have to think of this as one vs the other.
Well said
@bumbleymummy
I'm part of the UK Covidence study - they have already discovered that
some people actually have antibodies beyond a year after infection.
My antibody test unfortunately came back negative, so what I thought was covid either wasn't, or it was just too long from infection to test.
I also had an interesting email exchange with Professor Adrian Martineau after I received my results, and he explained that the more severe the infection, the higher (and in some cases, longer lasting) the antibody levels, and memory cell protection (not currently measured in antibody tests). And that memory cell protection (can't recall if it was T or B cell) can exist even with mild infections (and let's not forget that latest figures are:45% of covid infections are asymptomatic, ie mild; and that some people will have immunity to/protection from covid from other corona infections).
As you rightly point out, we have more immunity data to go on with infections than we do with vaccinations and herd immunity is more than achievable with vaccines and previous infection.
The importance of micronutrients (and widespread deficiencies) in immunity - for general health and response to covid) - is also being wilfully ignored.
The plain, simple fact is that there are many people who don't NEED to be vaccinated (but if they choose to be so, that's 👍 with me). It's a choice that can't be argued with for both ethical and common sense reasons.