I am not a scientist, nor a politician or lawyer.
My hope, and I’m aware it’s a “Pollyanna” kind of hope is that AZ have been fairly quiet, save for the article last week, because they are confident in their contracts.
At the end of the day, they signed up with Oxford knowing full well that this was a long-term, not for profit basis. I’m not naive enough to think it’s 109% altruistic - ie flipping good PR once we finally turn things around.
To me, the fact that they haven’t come back fighting feels quite telling. They are comfortable with the terms of the two contacts in question. They have not said they’re not delivering full-stop, and am assuming they feel confident that orders will be met once glitches are ironed out.
Rather than wasting time and effort on trying to counter some of the rhetoric from the EU, they are carrying on doing what they’ve been doing for the last 10 months. Which is trying to upscale a vaccine production line across multiple sites with the eventual aim of producing as much as possible, at cost, for as many people as possible. I’d far rather they carry on doing that than waste time trying to fight back against the EC accusations.
I am not one to normally stand up for “big pharma”. But on this occasion, I’m trying to be objective. Oxford were very clear from the outset re not-for-profit. AZ had to agree to this to upscale. Upscaling to such huge numbers, in a very sort timeframe is always going to be difficult. There will be delays, but they will be worked through as soon as possible (we had delays advised end of last year).
I am a bit gobsmacked at the EC not even being able to fully redact a contract online, but think that’s an entirely different thread!