@Parker231
It’s the same with Manchester, Leeds, Newcastle and Birmingham. All huge cities but all in tier 3 and not split into boroughs or councils.
I'm a northerner living in London and I agree that some northern cities and towns have been treated disgracefully & understand the resentment, but London has a much bigger economy and population, so putting the whole city into Tier 3 will have a huge economic impact on the whole country, not just the south-east. Even keeping a few London boroughs in Tier 2 could help many businesses and employers survive and lessen the economic damage UK-wide. To put it into perspective, Newcastle's population is about the same size as the 20th largest London borough.
There's a big difference in Covid rates between London boroughs (80.2 cases per 100k lowest, up to 346 per 100k) and some of the lowest rates are in the boroughs with the biggest economic impact. I just don't think it should be about being fair and London suffering as much as the rest of the country - If we can keep even 10 boroughs in Tier 2, surely it's economic madness not to do that?
Having said that, I don't know how close London hospitals are to capacity, and hospitals often serve more than one borough, so it's not going to be as simple as looking at the rates for each borough. But I've read that London's NHS capacity is higher than the UK average because it's designed to cope with residents plus 2 million extra people a day (tourists, business visitors, etc) who are mostly staying away atm, so apparently that is helping with Covid capacity.