Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

US, Iran and mediators discuss terms for a 45-day ceasefire

905 replies

Twiglets1 · 06/04/2026 10:19

As reported by Axios, the U.S., Iran and a group of regional mediators are discussing the terms for a potential 45-day ceasefire that could lead to a permanent end to the war, according to four U.S., Israeli and regional sources with knowledge of the talks.

Four sources with knowledge of the diplomatic efforts said the negotiations are taking place through Pakistani, Egyptian and Turkish mediators and also through text messages sent between Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff and Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi.

  • A U.S. official said the Trump administration gave Iran several proposals in recent days, but so far Iranian officials hadn't accepted them.
  • The sources said the mediators are discussing with the parties the terms for two-phased deal; the first phase would a potential 45-day ceasefire during which a permanent end to the war would be negotiated.
  • The ceasefire could be extended if more time were needed for talks, one of the sources said.
  • The second phase would be an agreement on ending the war.
  • The sources said mediators think that fully reopening the Strait of Hormuz and a solution for Iran's highly enriched Uranium — either through its removal from the country or dilution — could only be a result of a final deal.
  • These two issues are Iran's main bargaining chips in the negotiations and the Iranians will not agree to fully give up on them for only 45 days of ceasefire, two of the sources said.
  • The mediators want to see whether Iran could take partial step on both issues in the first phase of the deal. They are also working on steps the Trump administration could take to give Iran guarantees that the ceasefire will not be temporary and that the war will not resume.

www.axios.com/2026/04/06/iran-war-us-tehran-ceasefire-talks

OP posts:
Thread gallery
75
TopPocketFind · 23/04/2026 18:49

The IRGC has forced the resignation of one of the key Iranian negotiators, parliamentary speaker Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf, Channel 12 reports.

This was the guy Trump earmarked as someone he could deal with.

Islandsofsand · 23/04/2026 20:15

Twiglets1 · 23/04/2026 18:00

I have given this information on other threads and I'm sure most people are well aware of the US core goals, but just as a reminder:

From day one, the objectives have been clear and unwavering: obliterate Iran’s ballistic missile arsenal and production capability, annihilate its navy, sever its support for terrorist proxies, and ensure the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism never acquires a nuclear weapon.

Since the launch of Operation Epic Fury, the Trump Administration has repeatedly and unambiguously reaffirmed these core objectives:

President Trump (March 2): “Our objectives are clear. First, we’re destroying Iran’s missile capabilities… and their capacity to produce brand new ones — pretty good ones they make. Second, we’re annihilating their navy… Third, we’re ensuring that the world’s number one sponsor of terror can never obtain a nuclear weapon… And finally, we’re ensuring that the Iranian regime cannot continue to arm, fund, and direct terrorist armies outside of their borders.”
Vice President JD Vance (March 2): “Whatever happens with the regime in one form or another, it’s incidental to the President’s primary objective here — which is to make sure the Iranian terrorist regime does not build a nuclear bomb.”
Secretary of State Marco Rubio (March 2): “The United States is conducting an operation to eliminate the threat of Iran’s short-range ballistic missiles and the threat posed by their navy… That is the clear objective of this mission.”
U.S. Central Command Commander Admiral Brad Cooper (March 3): “Our military in the Middle East is undertaking an unprecedented operation to eliminate Iran’s ability to threaten Americans, as they’ve been doing for nearly half a century.”
Under Secretary of War for Policy Elbridge Colby (March 3): “I think I can lay out once again the objectives of the military campaign… which are focused on addressing the ability of the Islamic Republic to project military power… And that’s primarily the missile forces of the Islamic Republic, which had obviously been growing substantially and posed a very serious threat… as well as the ability to produce that, and then the Iranian navy.”
Secretary Rubio (March 3): “Our objectives remain, as they’ve been identified from the beginning and the President laid out clearly yesterday. Iran can never have a nuclear weapon and we will not allow Iran to hide behind the immunity of a massive short-term ballistic missile inventory, or the ability to make them or launch them… As well as the destruction of their navy.”
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth (March 4): “The mission is laser-focused: obliterate Iran’s missiles and drones and facilities that produce them, annihilate its navy and critical security infrastructure, and sever their pathway to nuclear weapons. Iran will never possess a nuclear bomb.”
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine (March 4): “The Operation was again launched with clear military objectives designed to dismantle Iran’s ability to project power outside of its borders, both today and in the future. First, we are targeting and eliminating Iran’s ballistic missile systems to prevent them from threatening the U.S. forces, partners, and interests in the region. Second, we are destroying the Iranian navy, degrading its capacity capability and ability to conduct operations… Third, we’re ensuring Iran cannot rapidly rebuild or reconstitute its combat capability.”
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt (March 4): “At the beginning of Operation Epic Fury, launched last weekend, President Trump laid out clear objectives to the American people on what the U.S. military seeks to accomplish through these major combat operations. Number one, destroy the regime’s deadly ballistic missiles and completely raze their missile industry to the ground. Number two, annihilate the Iranian regime’s navy… Number three, Operation Epic Fury will ensure the regime’s terrorist proxies can no longer destabilize the region or the free world and attack our armed forces… Number four, this mission will guarantee Iran can never obtain a nuclear weapon.”
Admiral Cooper (March 5): “We will systemically dismantle Iran’s missile production capability for the future, and that’s absolutely in progress…”
Press Secretary Leavitt (March 6): “We are well on our way to achieving those objectives — annihilating Iran’s navy… taking out the ballistic missile threat that Iran posed to the United States and our troops and bases in the region… ensuring Iran can never obtain a nuclear weapon, as well, and significantly weakening their proxies in the region.”
President Trump (March 9): “We’re achieving major strides toward completing our military objective… Most of Iran’s naval power has been sunk… We continue to target Iran’s drone and missile capabilities… We’re also annihilating the manufacturing base that the regime uses to build drones and missiles.”
Secretary Rubio (March 9): “It is important to continue to remind the American people of why it is that the greatest military in the history of the world is engaged in this operation. It is to destroy the ability of this regime to launch missiles both by destroying their missiles and their launchers, destroy the factories that make these missiles, and destroy their navy.”
Secretary Hegseth (March 10): “[Our objectives] are straightforward and we are executing them with ruthless precision. One, destroy their missile stockpiles, their missile launchers, and their defense industrial base — missiles and their ability to make them. Two, destroy their navy. And three, permanently deny Iran nuclear weapons forever.”
General Caine (March 10): “The joint force remains focused on three military objectives: continue to destroy Iranian ballistic missiles and drone capability in order to prevent attacks on the U.S. and others throughout the region. And this means attacking launch sites, command and control nodes, stockpiles before they can threaten our personnel, our facilities and our partners. Second, we continue to strike the Iranian Navy and their capabilities in order to do things like sustain movement through the Straits of Hormuz. And third, we continue to start working on and going deeper into Iran’s military and industrial base in order to prevent the regime from being able to attack Americans, our interests, and our partners for years to come and project power outside their borders.”
Press Secretary Leavitt (March 10): “Moving forward, the stated objectives for Operation Epic Fury remain the same: destroy the terrorist regime’s ballistic missiles, raze their Iranian missile industry to the ground, ensure their terrorist proxies can no longer destabilize the region, and ensure that Iran never obtains a nuclear weapon.”
Secretary Hegseth (March 13): “I serve God, the troops, the country, the Constitution, and the President of the United States and answer only to those, all in service of victory on the battlefield and the military objectives that we’ve laid out from day one: defeat the missiles, missile launchers, and defense industrial base, which I laid out today; defeat the navy; and deny Iran the ability to have a nuclear weapon.”
Secretary Hegseth (March 13): “We define success — again, 13 days in — by reaching the military objectives that we’ve laid out: launchers, missile launchers, defense industrial base, their navy, the ability to project power on the naval sense, leading toward denying them to get a nuclear weapon.”
White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller (March 18): “The American military objective is to neuter the regime — to render them impotent. That is what President Trump is doing. Day by day, the regime is being rendered impotent in terms of being able to wield instruments of national power against the world… President Trump will not allow this regime — this bloodlusting regime — to hold us hostage with energy blackmail, with missile blackmail, or with nuclear blackmail.”
Secretary Hegseth (March 19): “Our objectives, given directly from our America First President, remain exactly what they were on day one. Destroy missiles, launchers, and Iran’s defense industrial base so they cannot rebuild, destroy their navy, and Iran never gets a nuclear weapon — our objectives from day one.”
General Caine (March 19): “U.S. Central Command remains on plan to achieve our military objectives and remain unrelenting in our pursuit of Iranian missile capabilities, UAV capabilities and their navy, and as the secretary said, their industrial base.”
Admiral Cooper (March 21): “U.S. forces continue to take bold action and remain on plan to eliminate Iran’s ability to project meaningful power outside its borders… Iran has lost significant combat capability over the last three weeks. We are taking out thousands of Iranian missiles, advanced attack drones, and all of Iran’s navy… Their navy is not sailing, their tactical fighters are not flying, and they’ve lost the ability to launch missiles and drones at the high rates seen at the beginning of the conflict.”
Vice President Vance (March 26): “The Iranian conventional military is effectively destroyed. They don’t have a navy. They don’t have the ability to hit us like they could have even a few weeks ago… The most important American national security objective that exists for any Administration at any time is you don’t want the worst people in the world to have a nuclear weapon. That’s why the President is doing this.”
Secretary Hegseth (March 26): “Operation Epic Fury is not an endless war. It’s a decisive campaign with clear objectives to destroy Iran’s offensive military capabilities and ensure they never obtain a nuclear weapon… Our objectives are clear: no nukes, no navy, and a complete dismantling of their missile program and defense industrial base.”
Secretary Rubio (March 26): “[President Trump] defined very clearly on the first night of this operation what the goal was. We were going to destroy Iran’s navy, and that is happening… We were going to destroy their missile launching capabilities. We’re well on our way to achieving that goal. We were going to destroy the factory so they couldn’t make more missiles and more drones, and that is moving forward. Every single objective the president clearly laid out on the first night of this operation is being effectuated.”
Vice President Vance (March 28): “That was fundamentally the President’s goal. He said, ‘Look, this country, they’re threatening us in all these ways. They’re still trying to build a nuclear weapon. We need to neuter them for a very, very long time,’ and that’s the purpose.”
Secretary Rubio (March 30): “We’ve destroyed their navy. We’ve destroyed their air force. We are well on our way to destroying the majority of their arms factories. And we are well on our way to significantly degrading their missile launchers. When those objectives are achieved, we will have achieved the purpose of this operation.”
Secretary Rubio (March 30): “This is about very specific objectives. The President laid them out on the first night of the operation… Here they are — you should write them down. Number one, the destruction of their air force. Number two, the destruction of their navy. Number three, the severe diminishing of their missile launching capability. And number four, the destruction of their factories so they can’t make more missiles and more drones to threaten us in the future. All of this so that they can never hide behind it to acquire a nuclear weapon. That was our objective from the beginning; that remains our objective now.”
Press Secretary Leavitt (March 30): “As I’ve said repeatedly and as the President has laid out, the objectives of Operation Epic Fury are as follows: destroying the Iranian navy, destroying their ballistic missiles, dismantling their defense industrial infrastructure that produces those weapons that have long threatened the United States and our allies, and then, of course, preventing Iran from ever obtaining a nuclear weapon.”
Secretary Hegseth (March 31): “Our core objectives from this podium, from day one — from me, from the Chairman, from the President, from the Vice President, from Secretary Rubio, and others — have been clear. Defense missile production and missile programs, so their entire missile program, defense industrial base, and production ability to build, and navy and power projection… And then of course, wrapping it all is Iran’s never going to have a nuclear weapon.”
Secretary Rubio (March 31): “We were going to destroy their air force; we have largely done that. We were going to destroy their navy, which we have largely achieved that. We were going to destroy a significant percentage of their missile launches; we are well on our way to achieving that. And we were going to wipe out their defense industrial base… We are on our way to doing that. Those were our four objectives because those were the four things they were going to hide behind to then develop a nuclear weapon.”
Admiral Cooper (March 31): “Now in our fifth week of the campaign, it is my operational assessment that we are making undeniable progress in eliminating Iran’s ability to project power in meaningful ways outside of its borders. We don’t see their navy sailing, we don’t see their aircraft flying, and their air defense and missile defense systems have largely been destroyed.”

www.whitehouse.gov/releases/2026/04/president-trumps-clear-and-unchanging-objectives-drive-decisive-success-against-iranian-regime/

Thanks for this
If we take the first paragraph posted, as there’s a lot of repetition:

Our objectives are clear. First, we’re destroying Iran’s missile capabilities… and their capacity to produce brand new ones — pretty good ones they make. Second, we’re annihilating their navy… Third, we’re ensuring that the world’s number one sponsor of terror can never obtain a nuclear weapon… And finally, we’re ensuring that the Iranian regime cannot continue to arm, fund, and direct terrorist armies outside of their borders.

They seem clear although I am not sure how achievable they all are? I guess time will tell.

BelleHathor · 23/04/2026 20:38

TopPocketFind · 23/04/2026 18:49

The IRGC has forced the resignation of one of the key Iranian negotiators, parliamentary speaker Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf, Channel 12 reports.

This was the guy Trump earmarked as someone he could deal with.

I would urge being cautious, the only source for this is Israeli Channel 12. Ghalibaf (and also Pezeshkian) is currently happily tweeting on his account.

Both Israel and America are trying to spread the narrative of Iranian leadership being is chaos.

This looks like psychological warfare likely designed to shape the battlefield so that they can justify any future attacks by using the excuse of "there was no one to negotiate with".

Thr 48 rule should be applicable, the US Navy ship the George Bush has just entered the region.

US, Iran and mediators discuss terms for a 45-day ceasefire
TopPocketFind · 23/04/2026 21:16

BelleHathor · 23/04/2026 20:38

I would urge being cautious, the only source for this is Israeli Channel 12. Ghalibaf (and also Pezeshkian) is currently happily tweeting on his account.

Both Israel and America are trying to spread the narrative of Iranian leadership being is chaos.

This looks like psychological warfare likely designed to shape the battlefield so that they can justify any future attacks by using the excuse of "there was no one to negotiate with".

Thr 48 rule should be applicable, the US Navy ship the George Bush has just entered the region.

Other outlets have now denied the resignation rumours.

It was reported by reliable sources but you are right to urge caution.

Twiglets1 · 24/04/2026 06:57

What has Trump been saying overnight?

  • The Israel-Lebanon ceasefire was extended by three weeks
  • Trump ruled out using nuclear weapons on Iran, asking: "Why would I need it?" He repeated his claim that he had already beaten Iran and that the US forces were "locked and loaded";
  • He also dismissed the threat posed by Iran's "little wise-guy ships" after Tehran's forces seized two boats and attacked a third in the Strait of Hormuz this week. The US leader also gave a shoot-to-kill order on small ships mining the waterway on social media yesterday;
  • "Don't rush me," the US president told reporters, saying he wanted to "make the best deal" and insisting he wasn't under time pressure and that Iran was instead;
  • He also admitted that Americans would pay more for fuel "for a little while," but in return, they got Iran "without a nuclear weapon";
  • And Iran has cut Hezbollah's funding, Trump also said.

news.sky.com/story/iran-war-latest-trump-blockade-strait-of-hormuz-lebanon-13509565

OP posts:
GentleSheep · 24/04/2026 08:56

Press Secretary Leavitt (March 10): “Moving forward, the stated objectives for Operation Epic Fury remain the same: destroy the terrorist regime’s ballistic missiles, raze their Iranian missile industry to the ground, ensure their terrorist proxies can no longer destabilize the region, and ensure that Iran never obtains a nuclear weapon.”

I do think there is an unspoken goal in all this - the unstated objective if you like, and although the original goal is what Leavitt says there, I think Trump (who is focusing on the US regaining power in all sorts of areas of the globe - think Venezuala, Cuba, wanting Greenland) has his beady eyes on Iran because right now he knows they are controlled/supplied/encouraged by Russia and China. He wants to prevent that and get control there, but he's finding it it's not that simple. He's playing a gigantic game of Risk. Too bad if that cuts off other nations' fuel and fertiliser supplies (along with other things). It would suit Israel too because Iran is of course a threat to them.

Yes Trump originally said this was to 'help the Iranian people' to regain control and he would open the way for them to do that but they'd have to finish the IRGC off themselves. A very tall order. Well it sounds good on paper, Trump being humanitarian and sorting out a whole region, he can put that on his CV for the Nobel Peace prize, but the reality is very different and at the moment all he's done is massively increase the hatred of the IRGC and their proxies for the US and Israel and all the other nations who have supported the war in any way, shape or form. Plus mess up those vital supplies.

Twiglets1 · 24/04/2026 09:10

Partially agree with that @GentleSheep

I just don't really understand the point I see several people making that the war has increased the hatred of the IRGC and their proxies for the US and Israel.

So what if it has? The IRGC was already committed to destroying Israel as far as possible via their proxies like Hamas and Hezbollah and already hated the US deeply before the war. So what's a bit more hatred really?

OP posts:
TopPocketFind · 24/04/2026 09:11

Trump also said he wanted to bomb Iran back to stone age, how does that square with helpig Iranian people and qualifying for the Nobel peace prize 🤔

(hypothetical question as there is no logic to Trump)

The government in Venezuela hasn't changed despite Machado giving Trump her peace prize.

TopPocketFind · 24/04/2026 09:32

The war also has increased the hatred for the US/Trump outside the ME

Inflation, petrol, food

MissyB1 · 24/04/2026 09:42

TopPocketFind · 24/04/2026 09:32

The war also has increased the hatred for the US/Trump outside the ME

Inflation, petrol, food

It’s increasing the distaste for Israel too, Gaza was bad enough, now starting a dangerous war with Iran, and trying to repeat what they did to Gaza in Lebanon. US and Israel will end up with only each other as buddies, no one else will have any respect for them.

TopPocketFind · 24/04/2026 09:52

MissyB1 · 24/04/2026 09:42

It’s increasing the distaste for Israel too, Gaza was bad enough, now starting a dangerous war with Iran, and trying to repeat what they did to Gaza in Lebanon. US and Israel will end up with only each other as buddies, no one else will have any respect for them.

Yes.

The funeral of the Lebanese journalist Khalil who was killed in an Israeli attack took place yesterday.

GentleSheep · 24/04/2026 10:06

Twiglets1 · 24/04/2026 09:10

Partially agree with that @GentleSheep

I just don't really understand the point I see several people making that the war has increased the hatred of the IRGC and their proxies for the US and Israel.

So what if it has? The IRGC was already committed to destroying Israel as far as possible via their proxies like Hamas and Hezbollah and already hated the US deeply before the war. So what's a bit more hatred really?

Well, 'a bit more hatred' can result in an escalation of attacks, particularly by proxies, just think about increased terror attacks in western countries that will increase due to this war. Look at the dramatic increase in antisemitism in the UK alone as a result of it. It can spur groups or individuals into actions they may not have taken before. It's like poking a wasp's nest. The wasps are now angrier and may become more organised in their attacks.

Plus of course if the regime isn't overthrown you will then add disgruntled ordinary citizens who no longer have faith in the US/Israel to help them. Basically hatred is like inflammation and it's spreading.

Twiglets1 · 24/04/2026 10:53

TopPocketFind · 24/04/2026 09:32

The war also has increased the hatred for the US/Trump outside the ME

Inflation, petrol, food

Maybe but that wasn't the point I was answering. I was addressing the point that the war has increased the hatred of the IRGC and their proxies for the US and Israel. To which I think, so what? The hatred for Israel in particular couldn't have got any worse than that displayed on 7/10/23.

OP posts:
Twiglets1 · 24/04/2026 11:00

GentleSheep · 24/04/2026 10:06

Well, 'a bit more hatred' can result in an escalation of attacks, particularly by proxies, just think about increased terror attacks in western countries that will increase due to this war. Look at the dramatic increase in antisemitism in the UK alone as a result of it. It can spur groups or individuals into actions they may not have taken before. It's like poking a wasp's nest. The wasps are now angrier and may become more organised in their attacks.

Plus of course if the regime isn't overthrown you will then add disgruntled ordinary citizens who no longer have faith in the US/Israel to help them. Basically hatred is like inflammation and it's spreading.

Increased antisemitism in the UK and other Western countries is just racists finding an excuse to be racist.

Normal people like me (you mind find that description debatable) would never think to attack someone or justify attacks on people or property on the basis of their race/religion/nationality or what was happening in foreign wars.

Do I blame all Muslims for attacks carried out by Muslims? No. Do I blame all Russian people for what Putin & his military are doing in Ukraine? No.

The wasps were already in the nest to use your metaphor. They are full of hate for Jews and that is a challenge for Western governments. If the hatred is only targeted at Jews, that's antisemitism whether people like to be associated with that word or not.

OP posts:
TopPocketFind · 24/04/2026 11:01

7/10/23 doesn't justifiy Israels actions in Gaza and Lebanon.

Twiglets1 · 24/04/2026 11:19

TopPocketFind · 24/04/2026 11:01

7/10/23 doesn't justifiy Israels actions in Gaza and Lebanon.

Again you are raising a completely separate point to the one I was answering.

I was responding to @GentleSheep comments and my point was that there was already extreme hatred from Iran and their proxies long before the Iran war.* *

No one said anything about 7/10/23 justifying or not justifying Israel's actions in Gaza or Lebanon.

OP posts:
TopPocketFind · 24/04/2026 11:23

It's a discussion forum, raising different issues is part of that.

MissyB1 · 24/04/2026 11:32

TopPocketFind · 24/04/2026 09:52

Yes.

The funeral of the Lebanese journalist Khalil who was killed in an Israeli attack took place yesterday.

I saw that, channel 4 didn’t pull any punches, Paraic O Brian was clearly angry and upset.

Legssses · 24/04/2026 11:38

Twiglets1 · 24/04/2026 11:00

Increased antisemitism in the UK and other Western countries is just racists finding an excuse to be racist.

Normal people like me (you mind find that description debatable) would never think to attack someone or justify attacks on people or property on the basis of their race/religion/nationality or what was happening in foreign wars.

Do I blame all Muslims for attacks carried out by Muslims? No. Do I blame all Russian people for what Putin & his military are doing in Ukraine? No.

The wasps were already in the nest to use your metaphor. They are full of hate for Jews and that is a challenge for Western governments. If the hatred is only targeted at Jews, that's antisemitism whether people like to be associated with that word or not.

I agree that the wasps nest already existed, but I think this war will kick wasp reproduction into overdrive.

I don't think there will be as many moderate Iranians in Minab as there was two months ago, for example.

GentleSheep · 24/04/2026 13:28

I've just listened to Hegseth giving a speech and honestly he does his best to alienate everyone. This is a clip from it:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c0mjev4kn9jt

He's still speaking now, am watching on Tousi TV.

TopPocketFind · 24/04/2026 13:35

This is one of the things he said

On the war in Iran: "It's a bold and dangerous mission, a gift to the world, historic courtesy of a bold and historic president."

Twiglets1 · 24/04/2026 14:07

Iranians fly to Pakistan for new peace talks

Iran’s foreign minister is expected to arrive in Pakistan tonight ahead of peace talks with the US.

A Pakistani government insider told The Telegraph that Abbas Araghchi was travelling alongside a small delegation, with a security team already based in Islamabad.

They added that a second round of negotiations between Tehran and Washington would probably go ahead after positive talks between Iranian figures and Islamabad.

Mr Araghchi spoke to Field Marshal Asim Munir, Pakistan’s de facto leader, and Ishaq Dar, the deputy prime minister, this morning.

It is not yet clear if a US delegation is also preparing to fly to Islamabad.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2026/04/24/iran-us-war-latest-irans-supreme-leader-gravely-wounded/

OP posts:
TopPocketFind · 24/04/2026 18:38

Witkoff and Kushner are going, Vance is left on standby Leavitt says

BelleHathor · 24/04/2026 19:10

Remember, it's Friday so time for a usual Trump "fantasy" in order to manage the markets.

Aragachi stated that the trip to Islamabad is part of a diplomatic trip, followed by stops in Muscat and then Moscow:

"Embarking on timely tour of Islamabad, Muscat, and Moscow.

Purpose of my visits is to closely coordinate with our partners on bilateral matters and consult on regional developments.

Our neighbors are our priority."
https://x.com/araghchi/status/2047685407941296331?s=20

Given how much the Iranian side have complained about Witkoff and Kushner (both times Iran was unilaterally attacked were during negotiations with these 2 bozos). The latest war can also be largely attributed to the real estate non nuclear expert Witkoff who:

"Comments made by Witkoff in two background briefings with reporters on Feb. 28 and March 3, as well as media appearances since the strikes began, made clear that Witkoff did not have sufficient technical expertise or diplomatic experience to engage in effective diplomacy. His lack of knowledge and mischaracterization of Iran’s positions and nuclear program throughout the process likely informed Trump’s assessment that talks were not progressing and Iran was not negotiating seriously."
https://www.armscontrol.org/blog/2026-03-11/us-negotiators-were-ill-prepared-serious-nuclear-negotiations-iran

Kushner and Witkoff are apparently not even leaving until Saturday, by which time Aragachi might have already left.

Seyed Abbas Araghchi (@araghchi) on X

Embarking on timely tour of Islamabad, Muscat, and Moscow. Purpose of my visits is to closely coordinate with our partners on bilateral matters and consult on regional developments. Our neighbors are our priority.

https://x.com/araghchi/status/2047685407941296331?s=20

Islandsofsand · 24/04/2026 19:44

GentleSheep · 24/04/2026 10:06

Well, 'a bit more hatred' can result in an escalation of attacks, particularly by proxies, just think about increased terror attacks in western countries that will increase due to this war. Look at the dramatic increase in antisemitism in the UK alone as a result of it. It can spur groups or individuals into actions they may not have taken before. It's like poking a wasp's nest. The wasps are now angrier and may become more organised in their attacks.

Plus of course if the regime isn't overthrown you will then add disgruntled ordinary citizens who no longer have faith in the US/Israel to help them. Basically hatred is like inflammation and it's spreading.

From podcasts and opinion pieces in newspapers (including from Iranians), I think the situation is far more complicated.

Firstly ordinary Iranians are probably furious at both the Iranian regime and US/ Israel given what’s happened already.

Within Iranian regime, recent events may have actually coalesced and reinforced distrust of US / Israel. Of course there may be some dissent, and exaggerations of this may be psych warfare.

I heard Hezbollah are still firing weapons into Israel, but how much of this is secondary to what is happening in Iran and how much due to the IDF extensive bombing of southern Lebanon?

»Normal » people don’t see what is happening in another part of the world and decide to act on racist views in a violent or aggressive way. Those events are of extreme concern and have a devastating impact. But events in the Middle East may affect how people think about Zionism, and this could be more insidious and prevalent?

Swipe left for the next trending thread