Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

US, Iran and mediators discuss terms for a 45-day ceasefire

899 replies

Twiglets1 · 06/04/2026 10:19

As reported by Axios, the U.S., Iran and a group of regional mediators are discussing the terms for a potential 45-day ceasefire that could lead to a permanent end to the war, according to four U.S., Israeli and regional sources with knowledge of the talks.

Four sources with knowledge of the diplomatic efforts said the negotiations are taking place through Pakistani, Egyptian and Turkish mediators and also through text messages sent between Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff and Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi.

  • A U.S. official said the Trump administration gave Iran several proposals in recent days, but so far Iranian officials hadn't accepted them.
  • The sources said the mediators are discussing with the parties the terms for two-phased deal; the first phase would a potential 45-day ceasefire during which a permanent end to the war would be negotiated.
  • The ceasefire could be extended if more time were needed for talks, one of the sources said.
  • The second phase would be an agreement on ending the war.
  • The sources said mediators think that fully reopening the Strait of Hormuz and a solution for Iran's highly enriched Uranium — either through its removal from the country or dilution — could only be a result of a final deal.
  • These two issues are Iran's main bargaining chips in the negotiations and the Iranians will not agree to fully give up on them for only 45 days of ceasefire, two of the sources said.
  • The mediators want to see whether Iran could take partial step on both issues in the first phase of the deal. They are also working on steps the Trump administration could take to give Iran guarantees that the ceasefire will not be temporary and that the war will not resume.

www.axios.com/2026/04/06/iran-war-us-tehran-ceasefire-talks

OP posts:
Thread gallery
73
TopPocketFind · 23/04/2026 11:26

Twiglets1 · 23/04/2026 11:21

I was using a quote embedded in the longer post by @Islandsofsand but you didn't laugh when they quoted Trump only when I quoted them quoting Trump.

Hmmm ... Netanyahu also said regime change needs to come from within and whatever you think of him, he is more consistent than Trump.

So they both said change needs to come from within Iran and obviously, it does.

I will laugh at that poster next time if that makes you feel better.

Twiglets1 · 23/04/2026 11:28

TopPocketFind · 23/04/2026 11:26

I will laugh at that poster next time if that makes you feel better.

Maybe just treat everyone the same 🤷🏼‍♀️

OP posts:
GentleSheep · 23/04/2026 11:33

RedTagAlan · 23/04/2026 11:25

And it all ties in with markets and big trades ?

Absolutely does. Am certain Trump's pals are all making a mint on the stock market.

TopPocketFind · 23/04/2026 11:52

Twiglets1 · 23/04/2026 11:28

Maybe just treat everyone the same 🤷🏼‍♀️

You have shown faith in Trump's comments before.

It isn't personal, but report if you feel it is.

Twiglets1 · 23/04/2026 11:56

TopPocketFind · 23/04/2026 11:52

You have shown faith in Trump's comments before.

It isn't personal, but report if you feel it is.

My suggestion was to treat everyone the same which would make for better discussions without these sort of diversions.

OP posts:
TopPocketFind · 23/04/2026 12:00

It is not a diversion to point out that Trump contradicts himself all the time.

Islandsofsand · 23/04/2026 13:52

Twiglets1 · 23/04/2026 08:58

Trump’s words make it clear he was hoping regime change would happen from within Iran after the war:

“When we are finished take over your government. It will be yours to take. This will probably be your only chance for generations”.

It is up to the Iranian people if they rise up against the regime again after the war and if they can successfully overthrow them. The US can only hope to create the conditions to help them achieve this by weakening the IRGC militarily and economically.

You can argue that Trump didn’t have regime change in mind with this quote because he wasn’t prepared to put US troops on the ground.

I think he did want regime change, but wanted the Iranians to rise up to US and Israel killing of the Iranian leadership. The political commentator from the article also thought this.

Of course you can think the US and Israel killed all those people for the hell of it, thinking they would just be replaced with the same old.

Islandsofsand · 23/04/2026 13:55

Twiglets1 · 23/04/2026 08:50

The article doesn’t irk me I just don’t understand why you are bringing up an article about something that happened before the ceasefire when making a point about the ceasefire 🤷🏼‍♀️

With Iran both sides talk about trust but there is zero trust. Hopefully the Lebanese & Israeli governments can gain enough trust in one another that the meetings today are productive. The words coming out from both sides are conciliatory in nature compared to the US & Iran, so it’s looking hopeful.

I have explained why I posted it. Trust doesn’t happen overnight nor over a month. Things need to be considered longitudinally given the history of this current and previous wars, ceasefires and negotiations.

RedTagAlan · 23/04/2026 14:06

TopPocketFind · 23/04/2026 12:00

It is not a diversion to point out that Trump contradicts himself all the time.

More contradictions than the Bible.

I saw an Iranian propaganda vid on CNN today. Iranian troops capturing a ship. And without going into the details of explaining why it is obviously a staged vid, it just is.

Yet here we are. The conditions Iran sets for the ceasefire/peace talks are more consistent, more logical to the objective spectator, and just overall more sensible, than anything Trump spouts in his near non stop media interviews and "TRUTHS". In fact, Trump is so much like that "shout at the sky" drunk fella at the end of the bar that media hardly reports what he says now as headlines.

And there is not much point in doing another headline story " Iran demands the same as .... yesterday".

Even the speculation is running out of steam. Because all this conspiracy stuff that can't be reported as real news, the insider trading and market manipulation: the stuff that should be on the way out fringes, is now becoming so horrifically obvious as per Occom's razor that the whole global experiment of democracy is in real danger of failing.

But the Trump apologists keep going, in their own authoritarian way.

RedTagAlan · 23/04/2026 14:28

Islandsofsand · 23/04/2026 13:55

I have explained why I posted it. Trust doesn’t happen overnight nor over a month. Things need to be considered longitudinally given the history of this current and previous wars, ceasefires and negotiations.

If we don't learn from history blah blah. We all know this.

Thing is @Islandsofsand, we apply this logic to maybe the last couple of hundred years of history. We recognize context and similarities and can logically process actions and outcomes. We might differ in our conclusions for various reasons, but we are trying to figure it out.

Others say history matters, but only when it suits them. A month ago, Trump tearing up the JCPOA was not relevant to them. Hand wave away. "We need to talk about TODAY". Now it's " We need to talk about today, not last week". Next it will be " We can't talk about today; we need to talk about tomorrow".

I think it is a variation of the God of the gaps fallacy. Constantly squeezing into a smaller and smaller space.

Twiglets1 · 23/04/2026 14:42

Islandsofsand · 23/04/2026 13:52

You can argue that Trump didn’t have regime change in mind with this quote because he wasn’t prepared to put US troops on the ground.

I think he did want regime change, but wanted the Iranians to rise up to US and Israel killing of the Iranian leadership. The political commentator from the article also thought this.

Of course you can think the US and Israel killed all those people for the hell of it, thinking they would just be replaced with the same old.

Of course he wanted regime change.

It just wasn't something the US could accomplish without boots on the ground. So it wasn't listed by the US as a goal of the war, only as something the US hoped would happen.

There is a thread about what Trump said the US wanted in order to end the war:

Iran must dismantle its existing nuclear capabilities
Iran must commit never to pursue nuclear weapons
There will be no uranium enrichment on Iranian territory
Iran must hand its stockpile of some 450 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 per cent to the International Atomic Energy Agency in the near future, in a timetable to be agreed
The Natanz, Isfahan and Fordo nuclear facilities must be dismantled
The IAEA, the UN’s nuclear watchdog, must be granted full access, transparency and oversight inside Iran.
Iran must abandon its regional proxy “paradigm.”
Iran must cease the funding, direction and arming of its regional proxies.
The Strait of Hormuz must remain open and function as a free maritime corridor.
Iran’s missile program must be limited in both range and quantity, with specific thresholds to be determined at a later stage.
Any future use of missiles would be restricted to self-defence.

www.mumsnet.com/talk/conflict-in-the-middle-east/5508101-trumps-15-point-peace-plan-irans-counter-offer

OP posts:
TopPocketFind · 23/04/2026 14:46

Trump latest TS

"Iran is having a very hard time figuring out who their leader is! They just don’t know! ... We have total control over the Strait of Hormuz. No ship can enter or leave without the approval of the United States Navy. It is 'Sealed up Tight,' until such time as Iran is able to make a DEAL!!!"

"I have ordered the Navy to shoot and kill any boat, small boats though they may be (Their naval ships are ALL, 159 of them, at the bottom of the sea!), putting mines in the Strait of Hormuz. There is to be no hesitation. Additionally, our mine 'sweepers' are clearing the Strait right now"

The US Navy Secretary, Phelan, resigned yesterday

Twiglets1 · 23/04/2026 14:48

And these were the 10 Iranian demands at the beginning of the ceasefire:

  • End of all attacks on Iran and its allies
  • Full ceasefire across the region (including places like Lebanon, Yemen, etc.)
  • Lifting all U.S. sanctions on Iran
  • Release of Iranian money/assets frozen abroad
  • U.S. military withdrawal from parts of the Middle East
  • Iran keeps control of the Strait of Hormuz (a key global oil route)
  • Guarantee of safe shipping through that strait
  • Recognition of Iran’s right to nuclear enrichment (very controversial)
  • No nuclear weapons (Iran says it won’t build them)
  • Compensation/reparations for war damage

It was obvious from the start that neither side would get everything they wanted. It's a little surprising they got as close as they did to reaching agreement. It sounds like the main sticking point was Iran's right to develop a nuclear weapon so presumably the US did agree to a lot of the other demands.

OP posts:
TopPocketFind · 23/04/2026 14:52

Those demands are the starting point of the negotiations

Iran sent experienced negotiators who are notorious hard to deal with, US sent Vance, Witkoff and Kushner.

RedTagAlan · 23/04/2026 15:02

TopPocketFind · 23/04/2026 12:00

It is not a diversion to point out that Trump contradicts himself all the time.

On contradictions. This on CNN just now.

"“I have ordered the United States Navy to shoot and kill any boat, small boats though they may be (Their naval ships are ALL, 159 of them, at the bottom of the sea!), that is putting mines in the waters of the Strait of Hormuz. There is to be no hesitation,” Trump wrote in a post on social media.
At the same time, Trump said that the United States has been working to clear mines from the strait.
“Additionally, our mine ‘sweepers’ are clearing the Strait right now. I am hereby ordering that activity to continue, but at a tripled up level!” Trump said."

There are a few of Trump contradictions in a single message.

And this ties in well with History. Because Mao was big on contradictions. He at least tried to explain them. Here is his famous 1937 writings about it. Made it into his little red book too.

MaoContrad.pdf (redstarpublishers.org)

The interesting thing about what Mao said on contradictions, is that it is revised history. From memory, so happy to be corrected, the official history is that he said this to Edgar Snows wife. She later said he did not. So it was apparently "inserted". Because people started to ask, "is that not a contradiction?" when things started to go wrong. During the Great Leap Forward I think.

But for some reason, who knows why, Trump does not appear to know what a contradiction is.

https://www.redstarpublishers.org/MaoContrad.pdf

Islandsofsand · 23/04/2026 15:36

Twiglets1 · 23/04/2026 14:42

Of course he wanted regime change.

It just wasn't something the US could accomplish without boots on the ground. So it wasn't listed by the US as a goal of the war, only as something the US hoped would happen.

There is a thread about what Trump said the US wanted in order to end the war:

Iran must dismantle its existing nuclear capabilities
Iran must commit never to pursue nuclear weapons
There will be no uranium enrichment on Iranian territory
Iran must hand its stockpile of some 450 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 per cent to the International Atomic Energy Agency in the near future, in a timetable to be agreed
The Natanz, Isfahan and Fordo nuclear facilities must be dismantled
The IAEA, the UN’s nuclear watchdog, must be granted full access, transparency and oversight inside Iran.
Iran must abandon its regional proxy “paradigm.”
Iran must cease the funding, direction and arming of its regional proxies.
The Strait of Hormuz must remain open and function as a free maritime corridor.
Iran’s missile program must be limited in both range and quantity, with specific thresholds to be determined at a later stage.
Any future use of missiles would be restricted to self-defence.

www.mumsnet.com/talk/conflict-in-the-middle-east/5508101-trumps-15-point-peace-plan-irans-counter-offer

I am glad we can agree that Trump wanted regime change.

There were no concrete US goals. Isn’t that partly of the reason why we are in this predicament? The U.S. could have continued negotiating with the prior leadership. Its actions have - unfortunately - resulted in death of civilians and the closure of the strait.

The war in Iran has only been a success for Israel. Israel will hopefully be safer for now.

RedTagAlan · 23/04/2026 15:37

And now we have a new excuse. He does not know who is in charge. TRUTH att.

And another contradiction. Because if it is the US Navy that controls the Strait, then why are the ships not sailing out with the goods ? The logical deduction from this POTUS message is that it is the US Navy that is stopping the flow of oil.

So who in the US Navy should the world talk to , to get stuff flowing ? Not the US sec of the Navy. He has just been purged sacked/resigned/sick mom ?

US, Iran and mediators discuss terms for a 45-day ceasefire
Twiglets1 · 23/04/2026 15:50

Islandsofsand · 23/04/2026 15:36

I am glad we can agree that Trump wanted regime change.

There were no concrete US goals. Isn’t that partly of the reason why we are in this predicament? The U.S. could have continued negotiating with the prior leadership. Its actions have - unfortunately - resulted in death of civilians and the closure of the strait.

The war in Iran has only been a success for Israel. Israel will hopefully be safer for now.

Of course there were US goals in the war. I’ve listed them several times. I don’t know why people keep pretending the US don’t have clear goals. I’m on my mobile now but I’ll link to the goals again once I’m back on my laptop.

Then people can move the goalposts again and go off at a tangent but still … the US had clear goals and are still clear that the main one is preventing Iran from developing the capability to build nuclear weapons.

Not an easy thing to forget I would have thought.

OP posts:
RedTagAlan · 23/04/2026 16:07

Islandsofsand · 23/04/2026 15:36

I am glad we can agree that Trump wanted regime change.

There were no concrete US goals. Isn’t that partly of the reason why we are in this predicament? The U.S. could have continued negotiating with the prior leadership. Its actions have - unfortunately - resulted in death of civilians and the closure of the strait.

The war in Iran has only been a success for Israel. Israel will hopefully be safer for now.

Quote : "The war in Iran has only been a success for Israel. Israel will hopefully be safer for now."

I don't think so. The Gulf states are authoritarian too remember. The closure of the strait massively affects them. Any unrest there might result in other nations being chosen as defense partners, especially now it has been shown how unreliable the US is under Trump and his stupidity.

Those "friendships" with Israel might be re-examined. After all, as Trump keeps saying, the US does not need Gulf oil ( but it actually does), so logically they would be looking towards Asia for future deals, stability, and a market.

TopPocketFind · 23/04/2026 16:07

They had that agreed in the JCPOA, the one that Trump tore up.

Islandsofsand · 23/04/2026 16:44

Twiglets1 · 23/04/2026 15:50

Of course there were US goals in the war. I’ve listed them several times. I don’t know why people keep pretending the US don’t have clear goals. I’m on my mobile now but I’ll link to the goals again once I’m back on my laptop.

Then people can move the goalposts again and go off at a tangent but still … the US had clear goals and are still clear that the main one is preventing Iran from developing the capability to build nuclear weapons.

Not an easy thing to forget I would have thought.

Sorry - I have only seen you describe outcomes Trump wants from negotiations. Let me know when you posted the outcomes he expects from the war itself. I have looked back over recent pages, but apologies if missed them.

Otherwise, what were the outcomes expected from the bombing of Iran that you think were clearly defined (understand you don’t think regime change was included in this).

Islandsofsand · 23/04/2026 16:49

RedTagAlan · 23/04/2026 16:07

Quote : "The war in Iran has only been a success for Israel. Israel will hopefully be safer for now."

I don't think so. The Gulf states are authoritarian too remember. The closure of the strait massively affects them. Any unrest there might result in other nations being chosen as defense partners, especially now it has been shown how unreliable the US is under Trump and his stupidity.

Those "friendships" with Israel might be re-examined. After all, as Trump keeps saying, the US does not need Gulf oil ( but it actually does), so logically they would be looking towards Asia for future deals, stability, and a market.

We will need to see if this war translates into longer reductions in tensions in the region. I hope something good comes out of it.

Twiglets1 · 23/04/2026 18:00

Islandsofsand · 23/04/2026 16:44

Sorry - I have only seen you describe outcomes Trump wants from negotiations. Let me know when you posted the outcomes he expects from the war itself. I have looked back over recent pages, but apologies if missed them.

Otherwise, what were the outcomes expected from the bombing of Iran that you think were clearly defined (understand you don’t think regime change was included in this).

Edited

I have given this information on other threads and I'm sure most people are well aware of the US core goals, but just as a reminder:

From day one, the objectives have been clear and unwavering: obliterate Iran’s ballistic missile arsenal and production capability, annihilate its navy, sever its support for terrorist proxies, and ensure the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism never acquires a nuclear weapon.

Since the launch of Operation Epic Fury, the Trump Administration has repeatedly and unambiguously reaffirmed these core objectives:

President Trump (March 2): “Our objectives are clear. First, we’re destroying Iran’s missile capabilities… and their capacity to produce brand new ones — pretty good ones they make. Second, we’re annihilating their navy… Third, we’re ensuring that the world’s number one sponsor of terror can never obtain a nuclear weapon… And finally, we’re ensuring that the Iranian regime cannot continue to arm, fund, and direct terrorist armies outside of their borders.”
Vice President JD Vance (March 2): “Whatever happens with the regime in one form or another, it’s incidental to the President’s primary objective here — which is to make sure the Iranian terrorist regime does not build a nuclear bomb.”
Secretary of State Marco Rubio (March 2): “The United States is conducting an operation to eliminate the threat of Iran’s short-range ballistic missiles and the threat posed by their navy… That is the clear objective of this mission.”
U.S. Central Command Commander Admiral Brad Cooper (March 3): “Our military in the Middle East is undertaking an unprecedented operation to eliminate Iran’s ability to threaten Americans, as they’ve been doing for nearly half a century.”
Under Secretary of War for Policy Elbridge Colby (March 3): “I think I can lay out once again the objectives of the military campaign… which are focused on addressing the ability of the Islamic Republic to project military power… And that’s primarily the missile forces of the Islamic Republic, which had obviously been growing substantially and posed a very serious threat… as well as the ability to produce that, and then the Iranian navy.”
Secretary Rubio (March 3): “Our objectives remain, as they’ve been identified from the beginning and the President laid out clearly yesterday. Iran can never have a nuclear weapon and we will not allow Iran to hide behind the immunity of a massive short-term ballistic missile inventory, or the ability to make them or launch them… As well as the destruction of their navy.”
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth (March 4): “The mission is laser-focused: obliterate Iran’s missiles and drones and facilities that produce them, annihilate its navy and critical security infrastructure, and sever their pathway to nuclear weapons. Iran will never possess a nuclear bomb.”
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine (March 4): “The Operation was again launched with clear military objectives designed to dismantle Iran’s ability to project power outside of its borders, both today and in the future. First, we are targeting and eliminating Iran’s ballistic missile systems to prevent them from threatening the U.S. forces, partners, and interests in the region. Second, we are destroying the Iranian navy, degrading its capacity capability and ability to conduct operations… Third, we’re ensuring Iran cannot rapidly rebuild or reconstitute its combat capability.”
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt (March 4): “At the beginning of Operation Epic Fury, launched last weekend, President Trump laid out clear objectives to the American people on what the U.S. military seeks to accomplish through these major combat operations. Number one, destroy the regime’s deadly ballistic missiles and completely raze their missile industry to the ground. Number two, annihilate the Iranian regime’s navy… Number three, Operation Epic Fury will ensure the regime’s terrorist proxies can no longer destabilize the region or the free world and attack our armed forces… Number four, this mission will guarantee Iran can never obtain a nuclear weapon.”
Admiral Cooper (March 5): “We will systemically dismantle Iran’s missile production capability for the future, and that’s absolutely in progress…”
Press Secretary Leavitt (March 6): “We are well on our way to achieving those objectives — annihilating Iran’s navy… taking out the ballistic missile threat that Iran posed to the United States and our troops and bases in the region… ensuring Iran can never obtain a nuclear weapon, as well, and significantly weakening their proxies in the region.”
President Trump (March 9): “We’re achieving major strides toward completing our military objective… Most of Iran’s naval power has been sunk… We continue to target Iran’s drone and missile capabilities… We’re also annihilating the manufacturing base that the regime uses to build drones and missiles.”
Secretary Rubio (March 9): “It is important to continue to remind the American people of why it is that the greatest military in the history of the world is engaged in this operation. It is to destroy the ability of this regime to launch missiles both by destroying their missiles and their launchers, destroy the factories that make these missiles, and destroy their navy.”
Secretary Hegseth (March 10): “[Our objectives] are straightforward and we are executing them with ruthless precision. One, destroy their missile stockpiles, their missile launchers, and their defense industrial base — missiles and their ability to make them. Two, destroy their navy. And three, permanently deny Iran nuclear weapons forever.”
General Caine (March 10): “The joint force remains focused on three military objectives: continue to destroy Iranian ballistic missiles and drone capability in order to prevent attacks on the U.S. and others throughout the region. And this means attacking launch sites, command and control nodes, stockpiles before they can threaten our personnel, our facilities and our partners. Second, we continue to strike the Iranian Navy and their capabilities in order to do things like sustain movement through the Straits of Hormuz. And third, we continue to start working on and going deeper into Iran’s military and industrial base in order to prevent the regime from being able to attack Americans, our interests, and our partners for years to come and project power outside their borders.”
Press Secretary Leavitt (March 10): “Moving forward, the stated objectives for Operation Epic Fury remain the same: destroy the terrorist regime’s ballistic missiles, raze their Iranian missile industry to the ground, ensure their terrorist proxies can no longer destabilize the region, and ensure that Iran never obtains a nuclear weapon.”
Secretary Hegseth (March 13): “I serve God, the troops, the country, the Constitution, and the President of the United States and answer only to those, all in service of victory on the battlefield and the military objectives that we’ve laid out from day one: defeat the missiles, missile launchers, and defense industrial base, which I laid out today; defeat the navy; and deny Iran the ability to have a nuclear weapon.”
Secretary Hegseth (March 13): “We define success — again, 13 days in — by reaching the military objectives that we’ve laid out: launchers, missile launchers, defense industrial base, their navy, the ability to project power on the naval sense, leading toward denying them to get a nuclear weapon.”
White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller (March 18): “The American military objective is to neuter the regime — to render them impotent. That is what President Trump is doing. Day by day, the regime is being rendered impotent in terms of being able to wield instruments of national power against the world… President Trump will not allow this regime — this bloodlusting regime — to hold us hostage with energy blackmail, with missile blackmail, or with nuclear blackmail.”
Secretary Hegseth (March 19): “Our objectives, given directly from our America First President, remain exactly what they were on day one. Destroy missiles, launchers, and Iran’s defense industrial base so they cannot rebuild, destroy their navy, and Iran never gets a nuclear weapon — our objectives from day one.”
General Caine (March 19): “U.S. Central Command remains on plan to achieve our military objectives and remain unrelenting in our pursuit of Iranian missile capabilities, UAV capabilities and their navy, and as the secretary said, their industrial base.”
Admiral Cooper (March 21): “U.S. forces continue to take bold action and remain on plan to eliminate Iran’s ability to project meaningful power outside its borders… Iran has lost significant combat capability over the last three weeks. We are taking out thousands of Iranian missiles, advanced attack drones, and all of Iran’s navy… Their navy is not sailing, their tactical fighters are not flying, and they’ve lost the ability to launch missiles and drones at the high rates seen at the beginning of the conflict.”
Vice President Vance (March 26): “The Iranian conventional military is effectively destroyed. They don’t have a navy. They don’t have the ability to hit us like they could have even a few weeks ago… The most important American national security objective that exists for any Administration at any time is you don’t want the worst people in the world to have a nuclear weapon. That’s why the President is doing this.”
Secretary Hegseth (March 26): “Operation Epic Fury is not an endless war. It’s a decisive campaign with clear objectives to destroy Iran’s offensive military capabilities and ensure they never obtain a nuclear weapon… Our objectives are clear: no nukes, no navy, and a complete dismantling of their missile program and defense industrial base.”
Secretary Rubio (March 26): “[President Trump] defined very clearly on the first night of this operation what the goal was. We were going to destroy Iran’s navy, and that is happening… We were going to destroy their missile launching capabilities. We’re well on our way to achieving that goal. We were going to destroy the factory so they couldn’t make more missiles and more drones, and that is moving forward. Every single objective the president clearly laid out on the first night of this operation is being effectuated.”
Vice President Vance (March 28): “That was fundamentally the President’s goal. He said, ‘Look, this country, they’re threatening us in all these ways. They’re still trying to build a nuclear weapon. We need to neuter them for a very, very long time,’ and that’s the purpose.”
Secretary Rubio (March 30): “We’ve destroyed their navy. We’ve destroyed their air force. We are well on our way to destroying the majority of their arms factories. And we are well on our way to significantly degrading their missile launchers. When those objectives are achieved, we will have achieved the purpose of this operation.”
Secretary Rubio (March 30): “This is about very specific objectives. The President laid them out on the first night of the operation… Here they are — you should write them down. Number one, the destruction of their air force. Number two, the destruction of their navy. Number three, the severe diminishing of their missile launching capability. And number four, the destruction of their factories so they can’t make more missiles and more drones to threaten us in the future. All of this so that they can never hide behind it to acquire a nuclear weapon. That was our objective from the beginning; that remains our objective now.”
Press Secretary Leavitt (March 30): “As I’ve said repeatedly and as the President has laid out, the objectives of Operation Epic Fury are as follows: destroying the Iranian navy, destroying their ballistic missiles, dismantling their defense industrial infrastructure that produces those weapons that have long threatened the United States and our allies, and then, of course, preventing Iran from ever obtaining a nuclear weapon.”
Secretary Hegseth (March 31): “Our core objectives from this podium, from day one — from me, from the Chairman, from the President, from the Vice President, from Secretary Rubio, and others — have been clear. Defense missile production and missile programs, so their entire missile program, defense industrial base, and production ability to build, and navy and power projection… And then of course, wrapping it all is Iran’s never going to have a nuclear weapon.”
Secretary Rubio (March 31): “We were going to destroy their air force; we have largely done that. We were going to destroy their navy, which we have largely achieved that. We were going to destroy a significant percentage of their missile launches; we are well on our way to achieving that. And we were going to wipe out their defense industrial base… We are on our way to doing that. Those were our four objectives because those were the four things they were going to hide behind to then develop a nuclear weapon.”
Admiral Cooper (March 31): “Now in our fifth week of the campaign, it is my operational assessment that we are making undeniable progress in eliminating Iran’s ability to project power in meaningful ways outside of its borders. We don’t see their navy sailing, we don’t see their aircraft flying, and their air defense and missile defense systems have largely been destroyed.”

www.whitehouse.gov/releases/2026/04/president-trumps-clear-and-unchanging-objectives-drive-decisive-success-against-iranian-regime/

OP posts:
BelleHathor · 23/04/2026 18:01

RedTagAlan · 23/04/2026 16:07

Quote : "The war in Iran has only been a success for Israel. Israel will hopefully be safer for now."

I don't think so. The Gulf states are authoritarian too remember. The closure of the strait massively affects them. Any unrest there might result in other nations being chosen as defense partners, especially now it has been shown how unreliable the US is under Trump and his stupidity.

Those "friendships" with Israel might be re-examined. After all, as Trump keeps saying, the US does not need Gulf oil ( but it actually does), so logically they would be looking towards Asia for future deals, stability, and a market.

UAE "threatened" this the other day, whilst begging for US dollars due to a cash liquidity problem, that if America doesn’t bail them out they'll be forced to look to China.

Full disclosure, I have absolutely no sympathy for the UAE as they've been all to happy to fund terrorist groups across the region and Africa. It's their money currently funding the killing in Sudan whilst they "steal" Sudanese gold.

https://www.ispionline.it/en/publication/the-role-of-gold-in-the-sudanese-war-207364

https://www.refugeesinternational.org/statements-and-news/refugees-international-calls-for-action-new-evidence-of-united-arab-emirates-fueling-genocide-in-sudan/

The Role of Gold in the Sudanese War | ISPI

The militarisation of gold resources have intensified the conflict, drawing in both local and international actors with competing interests.

https://www.ispionline.it/en/publication/the-role-of-gold-in-the-sudanese-war-207364

BelleHathor · 23/04/2026 18:03

RedTagAlan · 23/04/2026 15:37

And now we have a new excuse. He does not know who is in charge. TRUTH att.

And another contradiction. Because if it is the US Navy that controls the Strait, then why are the ships not sailing out with the goods ? The logical deduction from this POTUS message is that it is the US Navy that is stopping the flow of oil.

So who in the US Navy should the world talk to , to get stuff flowing ? Not the US sec of the Navy. He has just been purged sacked/resigned/sick mom ?

Flights with dodgy, convicted traffickers?
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/02/06/politics/phelan-epstein-flight

Exclusive: Navy secretary John Phelan listed as passenger on Jeffrey Epstein’s private plane in 2006 | CNN Politics

Secretary of the Navy John Phelan is named on a flight manifest found among millions of documents related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein that have been released in recent months, showing that he flew in 2006 from London to New York on Epstei...

https://edition.cnn.com/2026/02/06/politics/phelan-epstein-flight

Swipe left for the next trending thread