Quote from @Twiglets1
"The Middle East has been made safer for Israel according to the author, who concludes that Trump sees the war overall as a win:
And in his terms, he may well be right. Iran is undoubtedly weaker. America has not suffered greatly. He has performed a task no American president has shunned — making the Middle East safer for Israel. Moreover, he has never much been concerned about the consequences of his policies for the rest of the world."
The bolded part is what Twiglets wrote, underlined is what Twiglets quoted.
I just do not see this at all. I think it makes it more dangerous for Israel. Simply because of interceptor ammo. There is very little left. Remember, as I posted before from press releases, manufacturing capacity for Patriot interceptors was 600 per year pre war. Western anti missile defences have been getting sucked in from everywhere. Iran are forcing interceptors to be used up.
This also accounts for Lebanon. Because I reckon Israel knew the number of interceptors was a massive risk, so they need a buffer zone in case their Iron dome fails. Once that ammo is gone, Isreal are left open to attack.
On top of this, there is the rest of the world. US military assets out of place. Available assets being worn into the ground ( USS Gerald Ford for example), and this whole thing was totally unplanned from the US point of view. Other US assets are in scheduled maintenance. We see evidence for this with Trump flapping about NATO and other allies.
Trump is a resource vampire. And he is sucking near all the US has available into the mid east. Does he not think the likes of Xi, Putin and Kim notice this ? South Korea or Taiwan ? And remember, who holds the bottleneck for rare earths, those elements that are essential for making anti missile defences.
Around the rest of the world war plans will be drawn up, existing ones revised. If the PRC go for the ROC in the next year or two, as many experts expect anyway, and if the DPRK have a go at the south, what then for Israel ?