Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

IDF bombs Nasser hospital and then bombs the rescue worker a second time.

382 replies

Kakeandkake · 25/08/2025 11:51

It is so sickening that they continue to act with such impunity. The bombed the hospital killing four journalists and THEN struck a second time killing the rescue workers who were trying to retrieve the bodies of the dead and injured.

The genocide continues in plain sight.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp89rp48246o

An injured emergency worker is led away by two other emergency workers. There is rubble and wreckage behind them. He is badly hurt.

Four journalists among 15 killed in Israeli strike on hospital, Gaza officials say

The strikes on Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis are said to have killed journalists working for international media.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp89rp48246o

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
Gloriia · 27/08/2025 17:26

'We are focusing on the Nassar hospital attack because it is the title of this thread'

Yes and as I went on to say you are not focusing on what on earth terrorists are doing there with their surveillance kit in the first place.

The only people to blame for civilian casualties are the terrorists who hide among them.

dairydebris · 27/08/2025 17:36

PinkBobby · 27/08/2025 16:52

I think there’s a lot of frustration and outrage out there so I understand why these threads are full of angry people. I try not to take any anger too personally when it’s directed at me and I just try to make my point as clearly as possible in the hope that open minded people understand what a lot of Pro-P posters think. I actually think a lot of people are in agreement about lots of things (Hamas need to go, Israel’s behaviour is at the very least questionable, there are extremists on both sides etc.) but the points we disagree on tend to be the focal points and the ones we keep coming back to. I do think that these forums are really really important though. Echo chambers are how we all get too sure and comfortable we are right and no one can disagree. I’d much rather be challenged (ideally in a polite way but as I said, I understand people’s anger) and ensure my opinions evolved and strengthened than be told I’m right all the time.

Back to the actual issue though - Hamas (aka ‘Palestinian leadership’) being a terrorist organisation means it will always disappoint you if you hold them to ‘normal’ standards. This low expectation is not founded in racism. It’s just the reality of extremism. I expect most people not to commit the acts terrorists do. I do expect terrorists to plan and commit horrendous acts. As I said, this puts Israel in a tough position because they can’t (or shouldn’t) play Hamas at their own game.

Perhaps its just my mood today, but I don't share your optimism that these threads are a good thing. I've been around long enough to see that the vast majority of posters dont actually make any attempt to understand the other pov, and more than that I believe to constant back and forth entrenches each side further into their own corner. After you've fought so hard and so long for a specific school of thought its extremely, extremely hard to break out.

I'm mainly here these days to point out untruths and misinformation.

I hope you can have success though!

Kakeandkake · 27/08/2025 17:36

Gloriia · 27/08/2025 17:26

'We are focusing on the Nassar hospital attack because it is the title of this thread'

Yes and as I went on to say you are not focusing on what on earth terrorists are doing there with their surveillance kit in the first place.

The only people to blame for civilian casualties are the terrorists who hide among them.

6-10 terrorist you say. Where did you get that figure from? Please dont tell me x

OP posts:
Kakeandkake · 27/08/2025 17:37

Kakeandkake · 27/08/2025 16:16

Just to be clear who are you saying was dressed up as journalists and killed that were then identified as Hamas members? Or are you just spreading misinformation as I haven't see that anywhere?

And this. Not going to answer? Which of the journalists killed were Hamas members dressed as journalists as you claim?

OP posts:
TooBigForMyBoots · 27/08/2025 17:41

Gloriia · 27/08/2025 17:26

'We are focusing on the Nassar hospital attack because it is the title of this thread'

Yes and as I went on to say you are not focusing on what on earth terrorists are doing there with their surveillance kit in the first place.

The only people to blame for civilian casualties are the terrorists who hide among them.

Im focusing on the damage done by those who carried out a war crime when they bombed Nasser hospital.

Its a hospital. The IDF knew that. And the result: more dead Palestinians, more dead medics, more dead journalists, more disabled Palestinians, more medical space and equipment out of action, more condemnation of Israel, more IDF soldiers at risk of being tried for war crimes, the weakening of Israel, more trauma for everyone involved.

Hamas hide among civilians.
Hamas don't care about civilians.
This is not new, nor does it justify the bombing of a hospital.

dairydebris · 27/08/2025 17:59

TooBigForMyBoots · 27/08/2025 17:41

Im focusing on the damage done by those who carried out a war crime when they bombed Nasser hospital.

Its a hospital. The IDF knew that. And the result: more dead Palestinians, more dead medics, more dead journalists, more disabled Palestinians, more medical space and equipment out of action, more condemnation of Israel, more IDF soldiers at risk of being tried for war crimes, the weakening of Israel, more trauma for everyone involved.

Hamas hide among civilians.
Hamas don't care about civilians.
This is not new, nor does it justify the bombing of a hospital.

International law specifically allows for hospitals to become legitimate military targets if acts deemed harmful to the enemy are being carried out in that hospital.

Neither you nor I know what was being done in that hospital that Israel deemed harmful to itself. A war crime may or may not have been commited.

Its also a war crime to conduct military activities amongst civilians with the intent to make those civilians targets. Hamas may or may not have commited this war crime here, again, neither you nor I know.

In any case, neither of these possible war crimes would have been commited had Hamas already surrendered and accepted terms.

A bit of balance would be very welcome here.

PinkBobby · 27/08/2025 18:07

dairydebris · 27/08/2025 17:36

Perhaps its just my mood today, but I don't share your optimism that these threads are a good thing. I've been around long enough to see that the vast majority of posters dont actually make any attempt to understand the other pov, and more than that I believe to constant back and forth entrenches each side further into their own corner. After you've fought so hard and so long for a specific school of thought its extremely, extremely hard to break out.

I'm mainly here these days to point out untruths and misinformation.

I hope you can have success though!

That’s totally fair - to be honest, I have moments when I have to step away too. But it’s important to call out weak sources/misinformation/racism (on whatever side you’re on) and it is important to hear the other side with some degree of open mindedness. Plenty of people clearly aren’t open to it which can make discussions feel like Groundhog Day but lots of people might be and the more ‘good’ sources and facts (as hard as they are to find) that are shared, the better!

PinkBobby · 27/08/2025 18:13

dairydebris · 27/08/2025 17:59

International law specifically allows for hospitals to become legitimate military targets if acts deemed harmful to the enemy are being carried out in that hospital.

Neither you nor I know what was being done in that hospital that Israel deemed harmful to itself. A war crime may or may not have been commited.

Its also a war crime to conduct military activities amongst civilians with the intent to make those civilians targets. Hamas may or may not have commited this war crime here, again, neither you nor I know.

In any case, neither of these possible war crimes would have been commited had Hamas already surrendered and accepted terms.

A bit of balance would be very welcome here.

Both sides have and probably will continue to commit war crimes. Both sides can explain why they have acted but, in my option, neither side can justify their actions. They’re a crime for a reason. So I don’t think Hamas should hide out in hospitals and purposefully put civilians in harm way and I don’t think that tactic gives Israel a green card to target hospitals.

TooBigForMyBoots · 27/08/2025 18:30

dairydebris · 27/08/2025 17:59

International law specifically allows for hospitals to become legitimate military targets if acts deemed harmful to the enemy are being carried out in that hospital.

Neither you nor I know what was being done in that hospital that Israel deemed harmful to itself. A war crime may or may not have been commited.

Its also a war crime to conduct military activities amongst civilians with the intent to make those civilians targets. Hamas may or may not have commited this war crime here, again, neither you nor I know.

In any case, neither of these possible war crimes would have been commited had Hamas already surrendered and accepted terms.

A bit of balance would be very welcome here.

Is "they had a suspicious camera" enough reason?

How is the destruction of a camera regardless of the loss of life, loss of infrastructure and risk of war crimes, balance?

TooBigForMyBoots · 27/08/2025 18:42

You're clutching at straws. Not providing balance @dairydebris.

dairydebris · 27/08/2025 19:08

TooBigForMyBoots · 27/08/2025 18:30

Is "they had a suspicious camera" enough reason?

How is the destruction of a camera regardless of the loss of life, loss of infrastructure and risk of war crimes, balance?

Edited

Do you have full access to Israeli intelligence?

Because I don't. There has been previous hospital strikes without their very own threads on here that have at later dates have been found to have killed senior members of Hamas. I'll link to a BBC thread below.

Israel target Hamas members wherever they can. International law allows for hospitals to become targets under certain conditions. Neither you nor I have access to full information.

It remains the case that had this Hamas nutjob surrendered along with his murder buddies at any time in the last months the war could have been over. And many people could still be with their loved ones.

No one here on these threads wants to see hospitals bombed. The balance comes in when considering why this war is still continuing.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3y046q91no

A fire on the outside staircase of Nasser Hospital throws up smoke as three people watch from higher steps

Israel kills Hamas official in hospital, as Gaza death toll climbs

Ismail Barhoum is one of the most senior Hamas figures killed since Israel resumed military action.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3y046q91no

GladioliGreen · 27/08/2025 19:22

TooBigForMyBoots · 27/08/2025 18:42

You're clutching at straws. Not providing balance @dairydebris.

And won't point out 'misinformation' when it's someone who is pro Israel making up stories not even backed by the IDF about what happened. So balanced.

dairydebris · 27/08/2025 19:23

GladioliGreen · 27/08/2025 19:22

And won't point out 'misinformation' when it's someone who is pro Israel making up stories not even backed by the IDF about what happened. So balanced.

What story have I made up?

GladioliGreen · 27/08/2025 19:27

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

dairydebris · 27/08/2025 19:34

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I didn't see any misinformation from Twiglets? I haven't read every single post on this forum though... and that poster has always seemed reasonable to me, perhaps you should raise it with them rather than this tattle tale, we're all adults. 🙄

In any case, my call was for balance in viewing the situation in Israel / Palestine. I suppose its too much to ask for balance in posts on here.

Gloriia · 27/08/2025 19:56

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

This is very unfair and unpleasant, we are all going on the masses of online often contradictory reporting. No one is knowingly 'making up stories'.

TooBigForMyBoots · 27/08/2025 20:01

dairydebris · 27/08/2025 19:08

Do you have full access to Israeli intelligence?

Because I don't. There has been previous hospital strikes without their very own threads on here that have at later dates have been found to have killed senior members of Hamas. I'll link to a BBC thread below.

Israel target Hamas members wherever they can. International law allows for hospitals to become targets under certain conditions. Neither you nor I have access to full information.

It remains the case that had this Hamas nutjob surrendered along with his murder buddies at any time in the last months the war could have been over. And many people could still be with their loved ones.

No one here on these threads wants to see hospitals bombed. The balance comes in when considering why this war is still continuing.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3y046q91no

I listened to what the IDF said.
First it was an accident.
Then it was deliberate, because of the camera, but the wrong missiles might have been used.
Then it was so they could kill Hamas members dressed up as journalists.

The IDF and Israeli government are throwing out lie after lie. You pick one and believe it, if that makes you feel better but it's still a war crime.

Kakeandkake · 27/08/2025 20:08

Gloriia · 27/08/2025 19:56

This is very unfair and unpleasant, we are all going on the masses of online often contradictory reporting. No one is knowingly 'making up stories'.

You still haven't said where you read 6-10 terrorists were killed. I have looked everywhere and can only find the IDF allegedly claiming to kill 6. Where did you get the 10 figure from?

OP posts:
Kakeandkake · 27/08/2025 20:09

Kakeandkake · 27/08/2025 17:37

And this. Not going to answer? Which of the journalists killed were Hamas members dressed as journalists as you claim?

Or this.

A bold terrible claim to make but refusing to answer where you got such information from. Which of the journalists killed where Hamas members dressing up as journalists?

OP posts:
dairydebris · 27/08/2025 20:10

TooBigForMyBoots · 27/08/2025 20:01

I listened to what the IDF said.
First it was an accident.
Then it was deliberate, because of the camera, but the wrong missiles might have been used.
Then it was so they could kill Hamas members dressed up as journalists.

The IDF and Israeli government are throwing out lie after lie. You pick one and believe it, if that makes you feel better but it's still a war crime.

Again, and for the last time, neither you nor I know the full truth behind what's happened.
The IDF lie, as all armies do. The terrorists lie, as all terrorists do. The truth will maybe come out, maybe not. Maybe the truth will be known ever to only a few select people- maybe most of us will never know.

My point remains that all those people would still be alive if Hamas had met conditions and surrendered.

I'll leave you to your righteous anger now. I hope you enjoy it. I think you might.

TooBigForMyBoots · 27/08/2025 20:20

My anger isn't a problem. It's a normal human response to violence like this.

I'd leave you to your denial, but you're the one who wants to discuss it here.

Twiglets1 · 27/08/2025 20:27

Kakeandkake · 27/08/2025 20:08

You still haven't said where you read 6-10 terrorists were killed. I have looked everywhere and can only find the IDF allegedly claiming to kill 6. Where did you get the 10 figure from?

This is where the figure of 10 came from, which we don't yet know whether to be true or not:

Channel 12, citing military sources, reported that 18 people were killed in total, including 10 Hamas operatives, though the IDF has so far confirmed only six.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/idf-widens-nasser-hospital-probe-amid-questions-over-tank-shelling-authorization

SaltAirAndTheRust · 27/08/2025 20:27

Twiglets1 · 27/08/2025 20:27

This is where the figure of 10 came from, which we don't yet know whether to be true or not:

Channel 12, citing military sources, reported that 18 people were killed in total, including 10 Hamas operatives, though the IDF has so far confirmed only six.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/idf-widens-nasser-hospital-probe-amid-questions-over-tank-shelling-authorization

That’s a completely biased source

Twiglets1 · 27/08/2025 20:29

SaltAirAndTheRust · 27/08/2025 20:27

That’s a completely biased source

Maybe... but @Kakeandkake wanted to know where the figure of 10 came from so I was obliging by telling them.

Kakeandkake · 27/08/2025 21:08

Twiglets1 · 27/08/2025 20:27

This is where the figure of 10 came from, which we don't yet know whether to be true or not:

Channel 12, citing military sources, reported that 18 people were killed in total, including 10 Hamas operatives, though the IDF has so far confirmed only six.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/idf-widens-nasser-hospital-probe-amid-questions-over-tank-shelling-authorization

Thanks.

So the IDF said 6 but Gloriia's source is this random Israeli channel that claimed 10? I can see why there is so much misinformation on this thread now.

OP posts: