No, it should not be a race to the bottom.
Never have I ever said it was okay to take Israeli civilians hostage - because that is not okay!
What I did indeed say - and this I shall stand by - is: it is also not okay when you kidnap children (and everyone else), claim they are "terrorists", or "security threats", or whatever ...
... and then you put them in a military court with a ~100% conviction rate and, at the very best, they get a sorry excuse for "legal representation" in the shape of some crony who works for this very court, and at worst none at all.
Or, alternatively, you just imprison people as "administrative detainees", a.k.a. people languish in prisons and they do not even get the chance to defend themselves in one of those sham kangaroo courts that would have convicted them anyway. But they do not even get that level of "pretence to due process".
You can shout "but it is different!" all day long!
If it is so very different, if it is so very justified and definitely not "state sanctioned hostage taking, cloaked in the terminology of a state" ... if that is true: pray, do tell me what happened on the West Bank during the last week? Why were as many Palestinians arrested and imprisoned as released? From what I gather: mostly what happened was: settlers terrorised villagers and the IDF terrorised Tulkarem and Jenin. Why were Palestinians "rightfully" "imprisoned" (not "taken hostage"), not settlers or IDF commanders?
Why, though?