@FactFairy
If Amnesty International and the UN and Israel themselves have said that Israel is cutting off water, electricity and fuel (because you need fuel for electricity and electricity for water salination then that is a crime. If Israel is so adamant about this, then I think the ICJ will happily look at it and decide.
A barrister is a barrister, they will argue to the hilt about what they believe is the right application of law. However, the ultimate decides are judges. Like I said earlier, if Israel and this barrister really want to stick it to Hamas, go on and do it at the ICJ - nothing is stopping them.
Arafat (from the secular PLO) wanted the Palestinians in diaspora, West Bank, and Gaza to return to their ancestral villages. Yes, the offer from the Israelis was generous but he justified and that's his and the PLO's decision because it was. Now, if Israel said "People who lived in Jaffa, and Haifa, and other former villages, come back and we'll give you citizenship or a path to citizenship" then I think it might have been received better. But what do I know, I am not a Palestinian so that is just point scoring. Ultimately this conflict is about land.
Also ”From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” = No Israel. Literal genocide." - this is wrong. It means Palestine will be free, it does not mean there will be no Israeli people. However, I understand that Palestinian liberation means the end of Zionism but Jews (of all nationalities might I add) did live in Palestine for centuries before the Balfour Declaration was written up.
If the Kurdish, who also don't have a recognised state, said "From the edge of Turkey, Syria, Iraq and Iran, Kurdistan will be free", does that mean genocide to the Turkey, Syria, Iraq and Iran? No, it does not.
I'm not clueless either - I have done my research and I've lived and interacted in Jewish spaces. I can just see ethnic cleansing when it happens.