@BuffetShark, I take issue with generalisations too and I hear you but didn't see DivineRoyalty's post as such. The fact she wrote 'most, not all' is enough for me to not declare it a generalisation but I understand what you mean.
One thing I always laugh at is skinny = beautiful, when it's really not automatically so. There's more to attractiveness/beauty than just if you have more flesh/more bones.
As someone who grew up seeing BEAUTIFUL women of all shades, shapes and sizes (and seeing men with/loving these women, not that it matters if men are with them or not), as well as not so pretty women of all shades, shapes and sizes (and men with/loving them), the 'slim/lightskinned, therefore attractive' brigade just makes me chuckle, especially as they declare this preference in a 'read em and weep, girls' manner.
I feel the same way about the 'male muscular body = automatically attractive' brigade. Some men forget that women also have 'preference' and they in all their preferential glory may not be the woman's preference either.
But honestly who cares? It's fine whatever anyone prefers, as long as it's from a healthy place.
Beauty really is in the eye of the beholder anyway, although it can depend on what the beholder has been conditioned to see beauty as. Some are genuinely more drawn to a particular type of beauty, regardless of the beauty standards they've been raised in/are accustomed to.