Haven't read the whole thread, but I think the problem with the term 'Full time mum" kind of implies that mothers who work are not 'full time' or somehow stop being mums when they go to work. Of course this is not true.
But it seems to imply that to be a 'full time mum' you have got to be with your child all the time.
However, I would be interested to know how this applies to school aged children. Obviously, the mother is not there all the time for that child - so does it mean that SAHMs of school aged children are also 'part time mums?' Are they happy accepting this title?
I would also love to know where I stand... I work term time only, school hours only. So for my DD1 (who is at school), I am there for her 100% of the time she is not in school - therefore, would I class as a full time mum? I'm there as much as any SAHM mum.
But for my DD2, I work mornings, so she needs to have childcare... so for her I am only a part time mum?? How can I be both a full time and a part time mum at the same time?? The only way round this seems to be to say that you only count as a full time mum if your child is with you 100% of the time... therefore, any mum of school / preschool aged children cannot qualify to be a full time mum.
The other question I would ask is how we classify mums who are SAHM, but choose to put their children in nursery / with a child minder 1 or 2 days a week. Are they full time mums?
I think the term Full time mum is useless, and actually says nothing at all... we need a term that actually describes the status of mothers, and what they do, because I am actually with my DD2 (despite working part time) far more than one SAHM mum I know of a same aged child, because she chooses to use a nursery to allow her to go to the gym / allows her child to socialise.
The term 'full time mum' is unquantifiable and so totally meaningless.