Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

that going on a night out 4 days after giving birth is a bit OTT?

279 replies

mears · 21/08/2009 23:02

Wearing mini skirt and thigh boots and baby over an hour away at granny's overnight?

Would you?

OP posts:
katiestar · 23/08/2009 22:09

Apart from psychiatrists getting very rich

sabire · 23/08/2009 22:09

No - not putting baby at risk.

But yes - defying nature. Mammals of all species generally keep their newborns close. It's instinctive behaviour, particularly in species whose young are especially helpless and vulnerable, as ours are.

juuule · 23/08/2009 22:11

Katiestar, I don't think you can judge all that on this new mum having one night out. How she cares for the baby overall is the important thing.

scottishmummy · 23/08/2009 22:11

had i had the chutzpah i would have done so.regrettably i didnt

juuule · 23/08/2009 22:11

defying nature?

scottishmummy · 23/08/2009 22:12

given as humans we have highe executive function,conscience and morals we aren't that comparable to mammals

snapple · 23/08/2009 22:12

scottishmummy what was the yes posted in response to?

sabire · 23/08/2009 22:13

Would also want to add that newborns instinctively prefer to be with their mothers than with other carers. I imagine it must be quite strange for a newborn to be separated from the only voice, touch and smell it really knows. 24 hours might seem like a very short time to an adult, but to a 4 day old baby it probably seems like an age.

bibbitybobbityhat · 23/08/2009 22:15

Yes of course it is OTT.

And I for one am a HUGE believer in mothers having me-time (boak at that phrase) and going out for the night and having grannies do the night shift.

Just not at 4 days post birth.

scottishmummy · 23/08/2009 22:16

a lactating mammal is non comparable to a lactating human

we have higher executive function,conscience,extended support networks, and reproduction isn't reducible to blithely saying what other mammals do

sabire · 23/08/2009 22:17

"given as humans we have highe executive function,conscience and morals we aren't that comparable to mammals "

Err, except when it comes to reproduction, childbirth and breastfeeding (and by extension early postnatal life). All of these things are governed by the most primitive parts of our brains and by our hormones. In any case - babies are not 'civilised' - they are creatures of complete instinct, and their need to be cared for in a way which makes them feel as comfortable and secure as possible in the first week of life surely counts for something doesn't it?

juuule · 23/08/2009 22:18

Patagonion cavy baby left in creche after birth.
"After the young are born, the mother puts them into a communal den (crèche) with babies from other maras. It?s possible a crèche can house the offspring of up to fifteen cavy mothers."

So while unusual it's not unheard of for a mammal to not keep it's baby close after birth.

scottishmummy · 23/08/2009 22:19

so sabire the post birth experience of a mammal is comparable to post birth experience of a human

that is risible

we are not reducible to biology. we are complex psychosocial beings

scottishmummy · 23/08/2009 22:20

great link juuule

sabire · 23/08/2009 22:21

The physiology of lactation is similar in most mammals: their young need to feed often in order to ensure a good milk supply, and therefore the mother is instinctively geared towards keeping her baby close to her during this period to maximise the chance of establishing lactation.

Interesting that we are the only mammals who ignore our instincts (or are devoid of them) when it comes to caring for our young, and the only mammals who fail at breastfeeding en masse.

woozlet · 23/08/2009 22:21

humans are mammals.

hambler · 23/08/2009 22:21

Mears, I agree with you completely.

I am astonished at what some here have extrapolated from your obviously light hearted original post

emkana · 23/08/2009 22:21

I agree that it's not all the same to the baby, a 4 day old baby is only just getting to know the world and the voice and smell of the mother is his/her security.

sabire · 23/08/2009 22:23

"So while unusual it's not unheard of for a mammal to not keep it's baby close after birth"

But it's not usual with primates, or in 99.9% of human evolutionary history.

scottishmummy · 23/08/2009 22:24

and good secure attachment and bonding is ongoing process,reinforced and made positive. an overnight stay will not disrupt parenting

and as bowlby said we dint need to be perfect just good enough

edam · 23/08/2009 22:24

I wouldn't have done it, or wanted to do it. But neither would I object to someone else wanting to do it. I'd be envious of their energy and ability to get themselves together enough to go on a night out!

juuule · 23/08/2009 22:24

Sabire originally you said "mammals".

sabire · 23/08/2009 22:28

I don't think that an overnight stay will disrupt parenting.

I'm just wondering what's happened to this woman's instinct to keep her newborn baby close to her.

scottishmummy · 23/08/2009 22:30

why do you persist with assumption her instincts are impaired?

snapple · 23/08/2009 22:31

why won't you answer what your yes post was in response to? just interested?

Swipe left for the next trending thread