On the one hand, I agree that both the school and the parents are handling this one badly.
On the other hand, may I refer the OP back to another of her posts:
jesusofutopia on Thu 13-Nov-08 11:48:00
"that's what she told me. She said "I'm not trying to paint him as an angel because he isn't, but he's NOT a bully. If someone pushes him, he WILL push back without a second thought, he can certainly handle himself, but he's not a bully".
Yet two other boys wants to change school because of him."
In other words, if two boys wanted to change schools because of another child, this was then taken by the OP as proof that the other child was a bully (not just somebody suffering from ADHD or similar).
But now we have 4 children who do not want to go to secondary with her own ds- and this is not proof of anything?
This does seem to me like double standards.
To me it would be pretty obvious that the school is not on the ball, that all the parents involved (including the OP in the earlier thread) are showing a blinkered interest in their own viewpoint only and that this way nothing will be improved for anyone.
My ds was very intimidated by a (mildly SN)and much bigger boy who kept knocking him down and telling him he was no good at anything, the school took action, parents kept communicating in a civilised manner and the matter was resolved; they are now good friends and everyone is the better off.
My nephew has had his education disrupted for over a year by three kids who are not intimidating but who shout and disrupt every lesson; noone is able to learn in class, the teacher has left after a breakdown, school is unable to resolve the matter, the parents are not communicating, everybody loses out.
I can tell you which class I'd rather be in.
It is clearly not just about the severity of the problem, but about how it is dealt with.