Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Friend says I can bring one child to wedding but not the other

408 replies

Oakeydoke · Yesterday 19:46

I have a lovely friend of many years, known since school.

She’s getting married and phoned yesterday to let me know the date, and also to ask if my 7 year old will be flower girl, which DD will be thrilled about so of course I said yes!

I said jokily ‘I assume DS is invited too’ (he’s 4). She went a bit quiet and said ‘is there nobody you can leave him with? Grandparents?’. I was a bit shocked and explained this isn’t an option (infirm PILs). I could in theory leave him with my sister but the logistics would be horrendous as the wedding is at the other end of the country, and Dsis is a couple of hours in another direction.

She said he might be able to come then but wouldn’t be given any wedding food and there wouldn’t be a chair for him at the wedding supper.

I felt a bit stung to be honest. I could totally understand if it was a child free wedding but it isn’t, as she’s asked DD. And DS would be old enough to realise we were all going away without him. We don’t really go on holiday so
taking a plane and staying away for a couple of nights would be a very big deal to him and I know he would be sad not to join us.

I don’t want to go in guns blazing if IABU though. What would you say/do?

OP posts:
Nearly50omg · Yesterday 22:37

If she expecting you to pay for the bridesmaids dress, flights to get her there and accommodation? Or is she offering to pay for all of that? SHE is getting a lot out of this for your DD being ornamental in her wedding at your cost!

velomumhackney · Yesterday 22:38

i would decide that she hasn’t prioritised your family, and would decline the invitation. because that is shitty. if this was a same town wedding and your son could have a sleepover with his best mate then alright. but a other side of the country wedding. no way.

Oakeydoke · Yesterday 22:39

Calliopespa · Yesterday 22:35

Incidentally OP, one of the issues she is up against is not that she might have to provide a head cost for just your DS, but that by including children beyond the wedding party she will find it hard to say no to more dc who are not in the wedding party. People accept that not every child can be in the wedding party; they find it harder to accept other dc are invited as guests but theirs aren't. So in her mind she nay be opening the floodgates to a dozen or so of her friends' 4 year olds.

I don't think it is personal against your ds. It is that she isn't including your DD as a guest in her mind, but as part of the "theatre."

Yes and I accept that, but that’s why you should decide your parameters and apply them fairly and non-discriminatorily; so either kids are welcome OR it’s a child free wedding OR only children of the couple’s relatives.

Saying this child can come but that child from the same family can’t, is very ‘off’ in my opinion.

OP posts:
Yogafiend · Yesterday 22:39

@Oakeydoke I have never been to a wedding where my kids aren’t invited.

FairFuming · Yesterday 22:40

I'm assuming the bride doesn't have kids? What a bizarre situation to invite a whole family except one child!
I wonder if she has done this to other families?
I wouldnt have left my son for several days with anyone at 4 while I was a flight away and not able to easily get back, its a huge ask of anyone to look after your kid for that long too.
Tbh in your shoes I'd probably not go and if I did I'd go alone, wtf does she expect him to do without a meal or a seat? Plonk him in the corridor abd hand him a cheese sandwich?

EmeraldShamrock000 · Yesterday 22:41

Calliopespa · Yesterday 22:35

Incidentally OP, one of the issues she is up against is not that she might have to provide a head cost for just your DS, but that by including children beyond the wedding party she will find it hard to say no to more dc who are not in the wedding party. People accept that not every child can be in the wedding party; they find it harder to accept other dc are invited as guests but theirs aren't. So in her mind she nay be opening the floodgates to a dozen or so of her friends' 4 year olds.

I don't think it is personal against your ds. It is that she isn't including your DD as a guest in her mind, but as part of the "theatre."

I’m sure other family members and friends will raise an eyebrow at an invited 4 year old when they’ve left their children behind forking out for childcare.
She shouldn’t have asked DD. There would still be a childcare issue in this.

OffTheMap · Yesterday 22:42

I would reply calmly and say “given that I will need to leave DH at home to do childcare I think I will attend on my own. I hope you find other flower girls “

EmeraldShamrock000 · Yesterday 22:43

Oakeydoke · Yesterday 22:39

Yes and I accept that, but that’s why you should decide your parameters and apply them fairly and non-discriminatorily; so either kids are welcome OR it’s a child free wedding OR only children of the couple’s relatives.

Saying this child can come but that child from the same family can’t, is very ‘off’ in my opinion.

Is it a child free wedding excluding the bridal party?

Oakeydoke · Yesterday 22:44

EmeraldShamrock000 · Yesterday 22:43

Is it a child free wedding excluding the bridal party?

No idea

OP posts:
Calliopespa · Yesterday 22:45

Oakeydoke · Yesterday 22:39

Yes and I accept that, but that’s why you should decide your parameters and apply them fairly and non-discriminatorily; so either kids are welcome OR it’s a child free wedding OR only children of the couple’s relatives.

Saying this child can come but that child from the same family can’t, is very ‘off’ in my opinion.

I agree generally, but I do think children in the wedding party is distinct from child guests generally.

But some child "guests" and not others, I agree, is off.

But then that's why she isn't asking your DS - because she doesn't want to have to ask others who aren't in the wedding party.

Your DD isn't invited as a guest.

Are you suggesting DS should be a page?

EmeraldShamrock000 · Yesterday 22:46

Oakeydoke · Yesterday 22:44

No idea

It’s not doable. Politely decline and leave it up to her to decide if she wants to invite you as a family.

Calliopespa · Yesterday 22:49

In any case, if you don't want DD going without DS, I think it's fine to decline the flower girl suggestion.

Stinkybooks · Yesterday 22:49

It sounds to me very much like she only wants you there so you’ll bring your pretty liitle girl as a prop to help make her photos look nice. That’s not friendship. I’d say no thanks.

ScrollingLeaves · Yesterday 22:49

She wants a pretty flower girl! Will you DD get a chair and eat?

I think you need to decline.

There are some lovely weddings where children and babies are included, given their own place to sit, and easy food, all complete with some nursery workers to look after them.

EmeraldShamrock000 · Yesterday 22:52

Stinkybooks · Yesterday 22:49

It sounds to me very much like she only wants you there so you’ll bring your pretty liitle girl as a prop to help make her photos look nice. That’s not friendship. I’d say no thanks.

That is reaching. There is a thousand reasons why she can’t invite extra children without causing offence. I highly doubt she only invited OP to use her daughter as a prop. It’s bizarre that people think like this.

MsAmerica · Yesterday 22:52

Oakeydoke · Yesterday 19:46

I have a lovely friend of many years, known since school.

She’s getting married and phoned yesterday to let me know the date, and also to ask if my 7 year old will be flower girl, which DD will be thrilled about so of course I said yes!

I said jokily ‘I assume DS is invited too’ (he’s 4). She went a bit quiet and said ‘is there nobody you can leave him with? Grandparents?’. I was a bit shocked and explained this isn’t an option (infirm PILs). I could in theory leave him with my sister but the logistics would be horrendous as the wedding is at the other end of the country, and Dsis is a couple of hours in another direction.

She said he might be able to come then but wouldn’t be given any wedding food and there wouldn’t be a chair for him at the wedding supper.

I felt a bit stung to be honest. I could totally understand if it was a child free wedding but it isn’t, as she’s asked DD. And DS would be old enough to realise we were all going away without him. We don’t really go on holiday so
taking a plane and staying away for a couple of nights would be a very big deal to him and I know he would be sad not to join us.

I don’t want to go in guns blazing if IABU though. What would you say/do?

It's not a matter of guns a'blazing.
You simply say, "I'm sorry, but we can't possibly leave the youngest behind. Not only are the logistics a problem, but that would be incredibly hurtful. I somehow thought you knew we had two children. We'll be sorry to miss the event, but of course send all best wishes."

Justchillinhere · Yesterday 22:52

This would upset me, inviting your daughter, buying a lovely new dress while your son is being ignored, not wanted. How can she say he'll have no chair or food with a straight face. It's bonkers, Our friendship would be over, she is being beyond unreasonable

Chilly80 · Yesterday 22:54

I think you should all decline and save the money for a family holiday instead

OneNewEagle · Yesterday 22:56

You can have a flower girl in the bridal party but no children as guests. That’s probably what she’s planning. Just take your DD for a few days on holiday and enjoy yourselves. You have a DH he can spend the week at home with your DS.

whirlingswirlingsaucepan · Yesterday 22:57

I understand your friend, and would consider it, then reason would kick in and I'd understand i can't invite just one kid from a family. Weddings make our brains go fuzzy. Also with all the guest numbers palaver. Just say you understand, but it's completely impractical and unfair for you to leave your son. It's tricky.

Wtafdidido · Yesterday 22:59

Simple then we wouldn’t go. She’s not that good a friend.

ScrollingLeaves · Yesterday 23:02

A pp asked if ds would be a page? If both were participants no one else would resent their own children not being there.

He’d be cute and dd could help him.

WinterSunglasses · Yesterday 23:03

Oakeydoke · Yesterday 21:43

It’s difficult because money is tight and if I was going to pay hundreds/thousands of pounds and use annual leave, I would rather it was a sort of family mini holiday (we won’t be going away otherwise next year). I know that sounds a bit selfish and I’m not basing my attendance on that. But it makes it easier to justify and coordinate.

I could take DD, but it would be a bit less enjoyable for me as I would have to leave the party early to put her to bed as I’m guessing she’ll be tired after a long journey and the excitement of the day. And I would have to monitor her the whole time (at the level needed for a 7 year old), so again - expensive and not particularly enjoyable.

I realise that sounds a bit selfish but I work full time, and the thought of taking a child hundreds of miles away for a wedding and turning it around in 24 hours while spending about a thousand pounds just doesn’t appeal!

So I guess it’s either go all together, or just me by myself.

I think the issue of fairness to the rest of your family and the impact on the family budget is hard to argue with. I would make this the basis of a calm, polite message to your friend saying that on reflection, it won't work to bring your DD and have to disappear when she goes to bed, and use up the limited family budget on that too. So apologies but your DD will not be able to be flower girl (hoping you haven't told her about it already). It's possible you could attend alone but that's the only option for you, and if she in turn decides that she'd rather use the invitation differently, then you will wish her well and hear about it all at a later date.

Personally I think she's been crass, especially on the no chair or food for your 4 year old part. But I would go high on this, as Michelle Obama says, without giving in and making life difficult for yourself.

Stinkybooks · Yesterday 23:03

EmeraldShamrock000 · Yesterday 22:52

That is reaching. There is a thousand reasons why she can’t invite extra children without causing offence. I highly doubt she only invited OP to use her daughter as a prop. It’s bizarre that people think like this.

Why else is the 7 yo invited then? Why invite one and not the other? A 7yo isnt magically better behaved than a 4yo.
it’s obvious that the little girl is wanted to make the photos etc instaworthy.

Bananacrepewithnuts · Yesterday 23:05

NormasArse · Yesterday 19:50

Wouldn’t be given any food or a chair? Fuck that.

Yeah that's really rude.
I guess she only wants children who are going to fulfil a role. Other kids are not welcome hence no food and no chair.

X
I would decline all round I think.