Russell Brand 🤢🤮

[Netcurtainnelly]

🤢 🤢 Russell Brand. I never liked him anyway, Now he's on trail. Denies all charges of course.

Omg that's grim. But I heard he was a clean freak. Would he really walk round with visible skidders on the exterior of his undies while interviewing a cleaner? He's worse than even I could imagine then!

Oh yes dobbin 😍😍😍

the poster is not saying we should have lower standards…she is recognising the unconscious bias/racism that black people are subject to every day and if you are a white male how unlikely it is that you would be defending him due to your privalege

again, why are you on a discussion thread trying to censor it as if it were a court of law or the media?

It could be a perversion

Makes him feel important and added bonus of attention from women. To be pitied truthfully.

Yes…better not pay him any more attention 😍

ideally, I think all people irrespective of race, gender etc should be treated equally. However, there is plenty of evidence to show that white men are treated more leniently in court and in other situations. So no, I am not racist but I think that you might be, in the context of your comment about the Rotherham gangs.

But the rest of us are allowed to think whatever we want. And we can talk about it too.

Unless, it would seem, you are in the 'reserving judgement until the outcome of the trial - innocent until proven guilty' camp as that opinion doesn't seem to be allowed to be expressed.

I seriously doubt it. The guy was throwing himself in the most obscene way at every woman that so much as looked at him or had the misfortune to unwittingly cross his path. The guy liked FORCING himself on women, he actually liked REPULSING them so that they would resist him, put up a fight. If they actually did have consentual sex with him, that wasn't good enough. He would find something they didn't want to do, cause them to become frightened or upset, so he could turn it into coersion and rape.

Bit of a bellend? Are you a bit of a simpleton?

An utterly grotesque person

I watched a documentary about him after it all came out about what he’d done. There was some footage of him just wearing underpants in a busy street and he stood there urinating in them. It was before he became famous and they said it was a publicity stunt to get noticed. A bloke nearby shouted something at him like “you’re fucking sick!” Or words to that effect. They also showed some clips of his stand up. Really disgusting sexist misogynistic jokes about having sex with women.

This x 1000!! Can't listen to him talking - such bollocking he spouts- way too many words!

It makes little sense that if you were reserving judgement, which you are at liberty to do, you would join a discussion thread because there would be no discussion

Another groomer🙄, when will people start seeing through these types.
Years of working in prisons and in mental health has taught me that vile men do not hang round the park in long macs . Everyone loves a psychopath and groomer until they show their true colours

Oh, but how people fawned over him when he was on Question Time and called Farage names.

There clearly is a discussion to be had because I (and a few others) disagree with those who seem to have tried and convicted him already.

There would only be no discussion to be had if everyone were reserving judgement, or everyone believed him guilty.

There's a difference of opinion, therefore there is a discussion to be had.

Everyone loves it when people call farage names, he gets all pissy and upset and writes letters to the BBC, "it's soooo unfair!"

You won’t have had your post deleted because you said men committed mass rape in Rotherham. Obviously. Because they did. You’ll have had it deleted because you were suggesting to a poster that they would have been biased in favour of such men because of their race.

Next bit of your post:-
Innocent until proven guilty has its limits. It means no criminal sanctions without a fair trial, a principle I fiercely stand by. It refers to the high standard of proof required by virtue of the serious nature of those sanctions, which of course used to be death. It does NOT mean don’t slag someone off online for vile behaviour they have already admitted. He doesn’t, and shouldn’t, get more protection from such slagging off by virtue of the fact that he’s having a trial over even more serious matters.

Facing serious criminal charges entitles you to a fair trial. It doesn’t wipe all the pre-existing dirt off you that you’ve smeared yourself in.

Exactly this. Even before these allegations broke I could never fathom how women would go near him (consensually). He’s minging and as for his horrible nasally whining voice

I found your post really distressing to read.
What is this you're saying - where did you get these details from?

you are telling everyone to stop having their opinions and reserve judgement because we have to wait for what the court says

we are trying to discuss what we think now whilst you guys saying “no you cant possibly say” over and over again

that isn't a discussion, its censorship of others

That poster is a man.

Its been on a documentary as it rings a bell…the clear it up bit