Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be appalled that parents need to be supported by government to potty train their child

723 replies

Wisefishswimpast · 05/10/2026 18:29

That^^

Why are these parenting fails happening? - not potty trained for starting school, tooth extractions in young children, rising obesity rates….

Is there no accountability?
Why is this happening?

YANBU - parenting standards have declined which is terrible

YABU - this is how things are because….<explanation>

I know there will be exceptions to the above, for example certain health conditions, late maturation of signals between brain and bladder. I am referring to the more widespread rise in these instances.

OP posts:
TurquoiseBananas · 06/10/2026 03:19

SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 06/10/2026 02:48

It isn’t just changing the nappy, though, @JLou08 - the disposable is simply bagged and binned, but the terry nappy needed to go in a bucket of napisan where it soaked until you had a load, then needed to be washed, dried and folded to the right shape to use. And if it was a pooey nappy, the poo had to be scraped off into the loo. And the plastic pants that went over them needed washing too - it was a whole lot more work than disposable nappies.

Also that a child who wets a disposable nappy won't feel it and be uncomfortable .

I'm sure it's a factor.

ThankYouNigel · 06/10/2026 04:47

YANBU. It is the responsibility of parents to teach their children age-appropriate self-care skills, informed by common sense and pride.

PaulBaker · 06/10/2026 05:09

VioletsTale · 05/10/2026 21:18

My well parented child ate (still does at 15 tbh) frubes!!!! I shall tell her she can run feral from now on, because... Frubes!

Mine has one everyday because if not my spoons would never make it back from school 😂

Bringemout · 06/10/2026 06:15

When I was potty training DD mumsnet was awash with the whole “readiness” thing, you would get the impression that you would damage their ability to pee properly or something.

We took a week off work and let DC run around without any pants on when she was 1.5yrs there was a lot of cleaning but she started nursery mostly dry and then they were brilliant about supporting. Lots of things with kids are easier if you do it younger. I think it’s a mix of some people cba and the belief that children will magically intuit that it’s time.

Tbh as well theres no excuse really, you have loads of information at your fingertips, most of us spend way too much time on devices anyway, use some of that time to look up potty training. We also need to start shoving responsibility back on parents. Your kids not potty trained they aren’t going to school, you don’t feed your kids you are going to get hauled over the coals until you do. I’m sorry but I have zero sympathy for shit parents. We keep focusing on feeling sorry for people and trying to understand instead of just saying “stop whinging and get it done”. We just help helpless people be even more helpless.

Bringemout · 06/10/2026 06:19

Ablian · 05/10/2026 23:31

No, someone sitting on their phone tapping into AI and Google are not the same as having an actual conversation with someone whose job it is to know about this stuff and to support families going through it. Googling information is not the same as being supported. If these things are seen as synonymous then we have lost something.

Of course there will be people who don't engage, and their children are the reason free nursery hours were extended. But it's a vicious spiral. The less support there is, the more vanishingly rare it gets to actually talk to someone about your toddler, the more people will drop off engagement and that is not all on them, it's on how small the crumbs are that are being offered.

If you need constant in person help to be told, take their pants off and keep directing them to the loo, there will be a lot of mess but they will get there to manage to do basic parenting then perhaps they just shouldn’t have children.

IzzyGone · 06/10/2026 06:54

Lipstone · 05/10/2026 20:50

This would be so good for sustainability too

If parents average of potty training was 18 months instead of 30 it would be great for sustainability as neither laundry or disposable nappies would be used for the extra 12 months. Added to which the savings of labour, wipes nappies would be around £700/800

Lipstone · 06/10/2026 06:59

IzzyGone · 06/10/2026 06:54

If parents average of potty training was 18 months instead of 30 it would be great for sustainability as neither laundry or disposable nappies would be used for the extra 12 months. Added to which the savings of labour, wipes nappies would be around £700/800

Yes of course. But thay is not happening.

I think the point of the the idea was to force parents to potty train, somehow.

VioletsTale · 06/10/2026 07:01

Katypp · 05/10/2026 23:24

I think the pps who say we should bring back shame are referring to the parents not the children.

I notice there have been a few commemts along the lines of young parents not being guided by THEIR parents, but if MN is typical it seems to me that young parents don't want guidence anymore. They seem more interested in keeping their parents st arms' length and criticizing everything they suggest, 'gently explaining' that everything they did was wrong 'because we know better now'.
It's the same with health visitors. Most weeks there is a thread about something a health visitor has said or done that the poster has taken umbridge over and the concensus is always to show thm the door as they don't know anything. Unlike the poster, who has been a parent for two weeks and is of course an expert
We have no respect for professionals and no respect for experience and this is where we end up.

It was the professional who told me to wait until DD was ready .

It was a different professional that told me that if she had no speech she had no understanding either. Literally “well, if she could understand, she ‘d be speaking!”.

It was several professionals that were utterly unconcerned with her lack of eating/drinking milk to then be racked over the coals when she was 2 because she was too short!?!

If I had listened to them, I’d be the parent you’re all bitching about.

VioletsTale · 06/10/2026 07:03

2BarbieOrNot2Barbie · 06/10/2026 00:57

This topic always gets me a bit puzzled. I live outside the UK and children start compulsory schooling at 3 (or before as the year is based on calendar year so as long as you turn three before December you start in September). It is very very unusual for children to not be toilet trained by this age. Schools are supposed to take children even if they are not toilet trained but in practice they will often refuse them and there seems to be a social shame motivator to have your child not ready for school. It does indicate that there is not a physiological reason children can’t be ready. 2 parent working families are also common here so it’s not time either.

Did your official health service also recommend waiting for signs of readiness before introducing them to potty for years? If not, there’s one main difference there.

BadBadCat · 06/10/2026 07:14

TurquoiseBananas · 06/10/2026 03:19

Also that a child who wets a disposable nappy won't feel it and be uncomfortable .

I'm sure it's a factor.

When you are potty training you don't wear a nappy. You put your child in pants and explain to them that we wee wee in the potty. Then frequently sit them on the potty and frequently ask, "Do you need a wee wee?". You praise them if they wee in the potty. If they have an accident then they see that they are wet.

Granville82 · 06/10/2026 07:15

We live in an increasingly consequence-free society generally. Look up suicidal empathy.

DontBuyAnotherBook · 06/10/2026 07:25

It is not recommended to shame a child if they poo in their underwear or wee the bed.

OonaStubbs · 06/10/2026 07:32

Don't shame the child, shame the parents.

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 06/10/2026 07:36

@IzzyGone I’m not sure in what era it was 18 months. Some dc are barely walking by then! My dc are 31 and 34 and no dc was potty trained in my social group before 2. Most were between 2 and 2.5. 2 was considered early. My DD1 was late at just gone 3 but then she was dry at night a month later so her learning was concentrated into a short space of time. We had tried for 6 months plus and our GP suggested I stopped for a few months and then started again. That was great advice and it worked.

Yes, these parents need to be shamed. Our nursery didn’t take non potty trained dc. There needs to be a much bigger push back from nursery and YR. Even when my dc started school, it was unusual to have dc not potty trained.

I would say though that it wasn’t unusual in some cultures. When I was working in education, I had a central TA budget to help schools who had dc arrive in yr with sen and no statement. The other issue in some schools was dc who were not potty trained. I remember one school had a record of 8/60. None white British. I’ve no doubt it’s a widespread issue now but there used to be pride in parenting, and dc meeting milestones. Now parenting is a long list of excuses and no-one cares. Children are being failed. We need tougher rules about starting school - not potty trained, dc does not start.

scalt · 06/10/2026 07:37

The insanity of month after month of lockdown didn’t help: not just this issue, but many others. Although some might argue that it meant parents had all the more time to do potty training, people lost their communities, connections, support networks, routines, and many children lost the skills they should have learned in their formative years.

FoldItIn · 06/10/2026 07:43

It's certainly not a class thing. I have lost count of the amount of friends who are adamant that their children aren't ready for potty training.
Increasingly, people cannot bear the thought of their children upset or uncomfortable for more than a minute. So they put it off until before they know it, their child is due to start reception.
Back in the day we just used to let our children run around with no nappy on until they got it.

I've seen a few posts alluding to it been a poor thing. It isn't. It's parents been petrified of somehow damaging their child permanently by expecting anything from them.

TabardOfDoom · 06/10/2026 07:50

IronEverything · 05/10/2026 18:45

I think we need to bring back shame. Because a lot of people's behaviour is pretty damn shameful.

I agree with this. There seems to be no shame or consequences any more.

as for the PP that said that this is the fault of the generation of parents above this one, you are having a laugh!! My DMum had an appalling childhood. Verbal and physical abuse and deprived of possessions, shut up for days in her room with no food or water etc. but when she had us two girls, she was a good Mum and tried to be everything her own mother was not. I could read and write and tell the time in a rudimentary fashion before I started school and all the kids in my cohort could go to the loo by themselves. This is a modern and lazy phenomenon.

SeedsOfReason · 06/10/2026 07:51

WouldRatherBeOnaBeach · 05/10/2026 23:48

And of course, there’s the more obvious point that cloth nappies actually allow the child to feel the wetness!
Single use nappies do not.
Those of us who use cloth nappies tend to potty train earlier and often do day and night in one go too.

Single use are also terrible for the environment- and full of chemicals. They are designed to be something that needs to be bought on repeat and keep the child in them for longer.

Not sure about the ‘sick of washing’ comment. My nappies are beautiful, I shall miss not washing them and seeing their beautiful prints when we are finally done with them.

Elephant in the room is disabilities and rising levels of autism and other issues that may be a cause of some of the cases in question. My children have all been in cloth nappies but my one who took the longest to train has turned out to be diagnosed with autism, and I don’t think that’s a coincidence!

Yes, I guess modern cloth nappies are a lot nicer in design than the greying, fraying terry nappies of yore!

And, yes, lower incentive for the child to move on if the nappies are no less comfortable than pants.

If we are taking the view that disposable nappies are going to remain the default, perhaps some bright spark manufacturer could take up the gauntlet - 'wet feel' nappies (in the larger sizes, not for new babies) to help with potty training - reverse whatever amazing tech 'locks moisture in' as they say in the adverts so the child will feel discomfort.

TurquoiseBananas · 06/10/2026 07:58

BadBadCat · 06/10/2026 07:14

When you are potty training you don't wear a nappy. You put your child in pants and explain to them that we wee wee in the potty. Then frequently sit them on the potty and frequently ask, "Do you need a wee wee?". You praise them if they wee in the potty. If they have an accident then they see that they are wet.

Disposable nappies can make it harder for the child to realise when they need to pee for themselves. If the child knows when they have peed themselves it will be easier when they potty train. If the child is used to be being disrupted from playing to be changed when they pee it will help too but if they can pee in their disposable nappies and be comfortable to keep playing it means they can get used to it. Disposable nappies do make potty training harder.
It's not the only factor but definitely a factor.

TurquoiseBananas · 06/10/2026 08:02

SeedsOfReason · 06/10/2026 07:51

Yes, I guess modern cloth nappies are a lot nicer in design than the greying, fraying terry nappies of yore!

And, yes, lower incentive for the child to move on if the nappies are no less comfortable than pants.

If we are taking the view that disposable nappies are going to remain the default, perhaps some bright spark manufacturer could take up the gauntlet - 'wet feel' nappies (in the larger sizes, not for new babies) to help with potty training - reverse whatever amazing tech 'locks moisture in' as they say in the adverts so the child will feel discomfort.

Why would the manufacturers of disposable nappies want to make a product to help children stop wearing them?

ShanghaiDiva · 06/10/2026 08:12

Dancenation · 06/10/2026 00:03

I think that part of the problem is the state taking over more and more of what was once parents' role. Breakfast clubs, free school dinners for everyone, teachers to do toothbrushing, sex ed, citizenship... all these things were once the preserve of parents. No wonder some of today's parents think that it's down to the school to do the sometimes boring and tedious task of potty training.

i remember sex ed lessons and free school meals back in the 1970s.

SeedsOfReason · 06/10/2026 08:13

TurquoiseBananas · 06/10/2026 08:02

Why would the manufacturers of disposable nappies want to make a product to help children stop wearing them?

Competition and marketing advantage. Manufacturers at the premium end are constantly looking for differentiators - their nappies are softer, dryer, more secure etc. - but there aren't that many ways of making a nappy distinct.

Yes, they want children to keep wearing them, but at the same time they do know there is a cut-off point, there has to be for children's nappies - at a certain size/age they would become continence aids, which is a different market .

Hence nappy manufacturers do already market 'transitional' products - those pull-up nappies that look like pants which are supposed to help children make the switch. This could be another thing marketed as a transitional product.

Kirbert2 · 06/10/2026 08:14

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 06/10/2026 07:36

@IzzyGone I’m not sure in what era it was 18 months. Some dc are barely walking by then! My dc are 31 and 34 and no dc was potty trained in my social group before 2. Most were between 2 and 2.5. 2 was considered early. My DD1 was late at just gone 3 but then she was dry at night a month later so her learning was concentrated into a short space of time. We had tried for 6 months plus and our GP suggested I stopped for a few months and then started again. That was great advice and it worked.

Yes, these parents need to be shamed. Our nursery didn’t take non potty trained dc. There needs to be a much bigger push back from nursery and YR. Even when my dc started school, it was unusual to have dc not potty trained.

I would say though that it wasn’t unusual in some cultures. When I was working in education, I had a central TA budget to help schools who had dc arrive in yr with sen and no statement. The other issue in some schools was dc who were not potty trained. I remember one school had a record of 8/60. None white British. I’ve no doubt it’s a widespread issue now but there used to be pride in parenting, and dc meeting milestones. Now parenting is a long list of excuses and no-one cares. Children are being failed. We need tougher rules about starting school - not potty trained, dc does not start.

Laws would have to change if we want to exclude children who aren't potty trained from starting school. The laws are currently in place to prevent discrimination against disabled children and/or children with medical needs which isn't always obvious at only 4.

I know several pp's have said 'exceptions for disabled children' but I think it might be easier said than done than some people may think and attempting to punish a minority of parents will also punish some parents with children who genuinely can't be potty trained by 4.

FlyByHere · 06/10/2026 08:18

I tried very hard to potty train two of my children many times from the age of around two. I made a lot of effort. I took the nappies off. I sat them on the potty. We made zero progress. When they were ready, it was still hard work but they were closer to the age of 3 1/2. At least with one accident a day and lots of successes you feel like you’re maybe achieving something.

My other Child was at that stage much younger and was mostly potty trained at around 2 1/2 I think. But they also had accidents for good while after that and took longer to become dry at night. It is easier with some children than it is with others and it’s even easier to judge other parents when you don’t know what the experience is like for them.

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 06/10/2026 08:19

@scalt But dc who are 3 or 4 now weren’t covid toddlers! They weren’t even born. I didn’t need a community or connections to potty train but I guess, for a few, the need to get on with it disappeared. That’s not the case for current 2-3 year olds though or even those starting school. So what’s their excuse?

Swipe left for the next trending thread