AIBU to think migrant sex crime data should be published? And to wonder why Labour are blocking the release of that data?

[Fabiansrule]

Labour Blocks Release of Migrant Crime Data

'Victims of serious crimes and their families have joined forces to demand that the Labour government publish detailed data on offences committed by foreign nationals, accusing ministers of withholding information that is “clearly and legitimately in the public interest”.

Among the signatories are victims of high-profile sexual offences and families of murder victims. One signatory is a 14-year-old victim of a sexual assault in Epping allegedly committed by an illegal immigrant, in the same Essex town where asylum seekers were housed at the controversial Bell Hotel.
Fiona Goddard, a survivor of rape-gang grooming who has campaigned publicly about her experiences, has also signed the letter.

Eight relatives of Rhiannon Whyte, a hotel worker murdered by a Sudanese national, are also among those backing the demand.'

https://europeanconservative.com/articles/news-corner/labour-blocks-release-of-migrant-crime-data/

It’s amazing the post that gets the !

What the family have faced has been atrocious.

No, I’m not like that. If data is validated, then I accept it. The data presented here is raw, unverified, poorly and obviously manipulated. It doesn’t matter what it says because it’s not worth the paper it is printed on.

I have no vested interest other than to have data that accurately represents the reality and then we have a chance at determining root causes and then the solutions.

I am in support of collecting the data and having it professionally analysed by PhD level statisticians who specialise in sociology, preferably in crime. Their reports are what should then be released to the public with fact sheets in layman’s terms for easy understanding by the general public.

Yes I think growing up in a different culture affects people, but it doesn’t follow that growing up in a culture means the person will 100% agree with it and want to continue to live that way. The % that do agree and want to live that way are the least likely to emigrate. It is the % that find their home country and culture incompatible with their own values that will risk their lives or spend their life savings to get out of that environment and they will invariably choose to emigrate to a country that aligns with their own values.

What on earth do you imagine that tells us?

Well let’s see. We have a good FOI system and Labour’s objections were rejected. So if they could have used the better ones you think they have they are keeping it quiet.

But where is your evidence for any of this?

That sounds rather sinister.

That's for those reading it to decide. I've provided some information for perusal, so don't 'shoot the messenger'.

How so?

And if it was, the last thing I'd want is ghouls delighting in the details on parenting forums. Such prurience is stomach turning to most of us.

Don’t be silly you’ve spent your time working against the family’s wishes.

They have asked for this information.

Well .. government is not releasing any information that would counteract any negative opinions..are they ..wonder why that is ...

Well that was a month ago, and my kid still goes to nursery next to an asylum hotel so… when’s that coming in?

It sounds as if you support any method possible of suppressing the publishing of data.

I wouldn't even go so far as to describe you as a messenger!

Good question. Afaik, Labour haven't provided dates. Have you noticed any issues?

Why are you adding a link that's over a year ago when Starmer was Prime Minister and Jenrick a member of the Conservative Shadow Cabinet?

Starmer is no longer Prime Minister and Jenrick is a member of Reform, so no longer a member of the official opposition party, Conservatives.

It's been explained multiple times in this thread by people with some knowledge of government structures and data analysis why this may be.

You have only to read my other posts to know that is grossly incorrect.

The appeal is current.

No. Evidence. It means backing up opinion with facts. It doesn't mean conspiracy and nudge nudge surmisal.

If you think anyone is 'delighting' in any of this, that says a lot more about you that the posters.
For some people it's OK if it's an anonymous female that gets assaulted, but to have to countenance the idea it could happen to one of their family members makes them irate.
Really they should use that ire to lobby MPs, councillors or anyone that has any authority in government/local government and ask what they are going to do about keeping W & G safe.

Can you link to that?

You sound a bit overworked. Take a breather.

The family want the information. Labour and their supporters have ostracised them and treated them abominably. Thankfully they have the FOI system and support.