Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Reform want to cut PIP

1000 replies

Daygloboo · 16/08/2026 09:15

Reform want to cut benefits for disabled people. They want businesses to pay more towards sickness etc. I find it repulsive that they want to do this. When will people understand that they are a bunch of self interested sharks who want to make a stack of dosh for themselves while in govt and that they font give a damn about anyone in need. Why cant the most vulnerable ppl who vote for them see thus. It's astonishing. It's ac joke. I eish ppl who get what Reform.iscreally about and how it manipulates would make sn extra effort to tslk to.ppl who dont seem to get it.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
Monty36 · 16/08/2026 19:13

KnittingBasket · 16/08/2026 16:52

You asked how the percentage of tax payers had changed.
I told you this -
10 years ago 52% of the UK population paid tax.
Now it's 64%.

Do you understand how percentages work?

It's a measure of the part of people who pay tax in relation to the whole number of people.

Crikey.

Yes, I understand how percentages work !
You are quite right.

Having looked it up it has increased due to fiscal drag and pensioners now paying it.

croydon15 · 16/08/2026 19:13

probablyamunreasonable · 16/08/2026 09:48

I think it does need to be reformed somehow. Disabled people of course need to be supported.

But as someone who struggles with mental health, I think with some cases and ‘conditions’ it would be better to focus on putting more money into support.

This - too many people receive benefits but instead should receive help to get back to work ( those with mild conditions).

spacewomangrounded · 16/08/2026 19:14

yellowspanner · 16/08/2026 09:53

This is a realistic solution to a benefits bill that is crippling this country. Good for Robert Jenrick. I hope they get in and this gets implemented.

Welfare spending as a percentage of GDP has not changed significantly over the last 5 decades - in fact, the welfare bill is actually lower now than it was under austerity and at points in the 80s and 90s under Thatcher and Blair. And compared to other OECD countries we spend a totally average amount on welfare - many countries spend vastly more and are not in any way crippled by their spending. The fact that our spending was roughly the same during multiple periods of strong growth would also suggest that welfare spending is not the reason we're struggling.

ClarkeandNewman · 16/08/2026 19:15

croydon15 · 16/08/2026 19:13

This - too many people receive benefits but instead should receive help to get back to work ( those with mild conditions).

Define mild conditions in a way that doesn't make ableist assumptions or rely on stereotypes and limited knowledge.

If you can, you'll be one step ahead of Reform and many other politicians.

x2boys · 16/08/2026 19:17

caringcarer · 16/08/2026 19:01

I didn't try to catch you out i just wanted to point out Psychiatrist whichever side of the pond are not always able to tell who is genuinely mentally unwell. As a mental health nurse you must know this.

Some will differ in diagnosis
But i think most know when somonec is genuinely ill
The study waa fascinating but over50 years old
Mental health and the treatment of mental illness has moved on a lot since the early 70s
Plus America has a very different heath care system to the uk.

EsmeSusanOgg · 16/08/2026 19:20

SodOffbacktoaibu · 16/08/2026 09:39

Pip is a benefit that allows disabled people to keep working.

So much misinformation about this.

There are thousands of people who can work part time but not full time with chronic illness/disability. PIP helps them get to work with taxis or helps with mobility schemes to get them a car. Otherwise people would be stuck at home.

Reform are also the ones wanting everyone at the office and not working remotely.... So I don't know how this will solve any sort of benefits bill issue. They'll just remove all the ways disabled people currently earn a living!

But Mumsnet is awful about disabled people so I don't expect much uproar here.

PIP pays for medical services and social care support that is not available via councils and the NHS because of decades of cuts and underfunding. It is nigh on impossible to get support with chronic pain via regular physio unless you pay for it privately. Councils reserve cleaning and meal services for the most extreme cases, which leaves many people struggling and needing to pay for carers, cleaners, food delivery out of pocket. If you need counselling or MH support beyond a very short and acute need (which is also challenging to get) again, you must pay for it privately.

By having PIP many people are able to work - part of full time - because they are partially subsided for private services that used to be, but are no longer available through public services.

If you want to reduce the need for PIP, these services need to exist via social care and the NHS - which would require a substantial amount more investment than the current cost of PIP.

HPFA · 16/08/2026 19:20

BlueRedCat · 16/08/2026 18:49

Sure - who will pay it?

They will.

It's the same principle as insurance.

ToWhitToWhoo · 16/08/2026 19:22

Freud2 · 16/08/2026 15:20

If you are able to work and get a wage why do you need PIP? I understand if you are physically disabled but not if you're anxious or depressed

Because your disability brings extra costs. For example, someone with severe anxiety might not be able to use public transport, and need to pay for taxis; or may need to pay for a companion/ carer to escort them.

Because 'anxiety' and 'depression' are also used for everyday emotions, there is often a misconception that they just mean being a bit worried or sad. Nobody gets a diagnosis of anxiety or deprssion just for being a bit worried or sad. According to the most commonly used diagnostic manual, the DSM 5, such disorders can only be diagnosed if, in addition to other criteria, they 'cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning'

caringcarer · 16/08/2026 19:25

x2boys · 16/08/2026 18:35

So what you mean by severe ?
When i was mental health nurse i had paients whose depression was so severe they were catatonic and were treated with ECT some patients had weekly maintenace ECT
But there would be clear docunrnted eivdence of this

Just writing on a PIP you have severe anxity and Depression means nothing.

Very few patients have ECT for depression. Most have antidepressants as I'm sure you know. It's easy to put on form you are so depressed you can't cook, you can't bathe yourself, you are so depressed you never leave your flat so can't communicate to anyone. Who can disprove it? If a person goes to their GP claiming anxiety or depression and has looked up symptoms on internet and says these are how they feel their GP will believe them. There is no objective test which is why fraudsters claim to have these disorders in the first place.

caringcarer · 16/08/2026 19:28

ToWhitToWhoo · 16/08/2026 14:54

This study was done over 50 years ago, and a LOT has changed since then Much more is known aabout psychiatric illnesses now. For example, the physiological aspects of schizophrenia were only just beginning to be discovered at that time. Moreover, the study was about people being placed in mental hospitals, and the criteria for such placements have changed TOTALLY since then. Then, it was rather too easy to assign people to mental hospitals, and too often some social nonconformity was sufficient. Nowadays, there are often insufficient places even for acutely ill people who may pose a danger to themselves and/or to others.

And people are not diagnosed with depression or anxiety disorders just on the basis of filling in questionnaires, though such questionnaires may play a part. But they need a comprehensive medical examination to be diagnosed. Diagnostic manuals include a list of criteria that must be met. Yes, some people could fake them, but people can also put a thermometer in hot water to fake a fever.

With no objective test, symptoms easily accessible on internet I'm sure some people fake having MI just to claim benefits.

Roaring111111 · 16/08/2026 19:28

KnittingBasket · 16/08/2026 10:09

Can you please give us your brief outline of how it's attributed now.
Thank you.

I’m not the person you’re replying to, but I do think it needs to be means tested, and there needs to be a much bigger focus on ensuring that those who have medical conditions that do entitle them to PIP receive the award. So many people, usually working class, don’t claim because they don’t know about it, are worried it would affect their UC, and/or cannot fill out the forms, or underplay their difficulties.

Meanwhile, the middle classes are plugged in and aware of what PIP is, and are more likely to apply for it and get it, because of their ability to write to a criteria which is set for PIP.

Professionals should be able to refer people for PIP (doctors, social workers, housing officers etc) without having to complete the forms.

DiscoRice · 16/08/2026 19:28

caringcarer · 16/08/2026 19:25

Very few patients have ECT for depression. Most have antidepressants as I'm sure you know. It's easy to put on form you are so depressed you can't cook, you can't bathe yourself, you are so depressed you never leave your flat so can't communicate to anyone. Who can disprove it? If a person goes to their GP claiming anxiety or depression and has looked up symptoms on internet and says these are how they feel their GP will believe them. There is no objective test which is why fraudsters claim to have these disorders in the first place.

That as the same for anyone applying for PIP.
They don't send someone out to check to see if you can actually cook yourself a meal.
Why are you so determined to make out that anyone on PIP for MH issues must be lying?

spacewomangrounded · 16/08/2026 19:29

Meadowfinch · 16/08/2026 10:05

But they aren't meagre amounts OP. Disability benefits have rocketed in the last few years when there has not been an equal increase in the rate of actual disabilities.

The U.K. literally cannot afford the benefits bill and it's getting worse. Something has to give, regardless of who is in power.

Starmer knew it but his backbenchers refused to allow any changes. In doing so they gave away the next general election.

Disability benefits may be going up but the welfare bill as a whole is stable and has been so for decades because other areas of spending have been cut and demographic changes also mean less is being spent in other ways. We spend roughly the same amount of our GDP on welfare today as we have done at more or less every point over the last 5 decades. In fact we spend slightly less now than under austerity and at several points under Thatcher and the labour governments of the 90s.

And yes, there is a huge amount of evidence of rising levels of ill health and disability. I don't know why you think there's not? It;s all over the news every day - do you not follow the news?

dreamiesformolly · 16/08/2026 19:30

croydon15 · 16/08/2026 19:13

This - too many people receive benefits but instead should receive help to get back to work ( those with mild conditions).

Can you give examples of these ‘mild conditions’?

ToWhitToWhoo · 16/08/2026 19:30

croydon15 · 16/08/2026 19:13

This - too many people receive benefits but instead should receive help to get back to work ( those with mild conditions).

PIP is not an out-of-work benefit, and is indeed what makes it possible for many disabled people to work. The two PIP recipients whom I know best- one blind, the other a wheelchair user- both work full-time.

caringcarer · 16/08/2026 19:31

HPFA · 16/08/2026 18:29

Where have Reform got these figures? How do they know that two thirds of recipients don't need it?

What account have they taken of all those carers only able to manage now because of the PIP their dependents receive?

From what I gather they have looked at explosion of new claims since COVID for people claiming specifically for ADHD and anxiety. Basically disorders with no objective test. It's not like a blood test, scan image or X-ray can be used to objectively test these disorders. The number of claims for these 2 specific disorders is far higher than in the rest of Europe.

caringcarer · 16/08/2026 19:33

Starpaper · 16/08/2026 18:31

I think you need to get your info from a better source.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cz977nxww1jo

I would never trust the biased BBC.

x2boys · 16/08/2026 19:33

caringcarer · 16/08/2026 19:25

Very few patients have ECT for depression. Most have antidepressants as I'm sure you know. It's easy to put on form you are so depressed you can't cook, you can't bathe yourself, you are so depressed you never leave your flat so can't communicate to anyone. Who can disprove it? If a person goes to their GP claiming anxiety or depression and has looked up symptoms on internet and says these are how they feel their GP will believe them. There is no objective test which is why fraudsters claim to have these disorders in the first place.

Agsin if they were so severe they would be under the CMHT have a CPN ; consultant psychiatrist
Who would provide evidence from their own assessment
Which i know you think they are all clueless

But do have years of experience
But look we are going around in circles with this so i think we will have to agree to disagree.

Tedsnan1 · 16/08/2026 19:34

Freud2 · 16/08/2026 17:16

Not a lie - I know people who work for the DWP and they confirm this. You may have to enclose a doctors or counsellors note but they are easy to obtain.

It is a lie.
There is indeed a form, online now I believe, not sure if so in all cases. However documentary proof has to be gathered, collated, copied, numbered, and referred to on the form as proof for each point. You have to explain in great detail how your condition affects your ability to perform in several categories, in both self care, and mobilising. This can be gruelling in itself. Admitting the truth of how shit your life really is to strangers is uncomfortable and upsetting.
Then there is the actual assessment, performed by someone who in all likelihood has no clue about your condition, nor its effect on the body or mind. This can be face to face or sometimes by telephone and can last hours. I've had a face to face assessment with a paramedic who said they knew nothing about my condition. I also had a face to face with a doctor who was deeply sympathetic, and told me he could see my struggles and was recommending i was awarded. He didnt. My report was so full of outright lies I thought I'd been sent someone else's.
I appealed and ended up having to go to the Upper Tribunal, assisted by a pro bono solicitor.
You need to stop spreading such vile misinformation.
The lives of disabled people are hard enough with this level of hatred.

caringcarer · 16/08/2026 19:37

x2boys · 16/08/2026 19:08

So you are suggesing mental health professionals are all thick and cant tell when somones genuinley anxious
To somone whose swinging the lead?

I'm suggesting there are some very good liars around who don't want to work and have found a disorder for which there is no objective test. I'm sure many are very convincing. A health professional would always give a patient the benefit of doubt.

SleeplessInWherever · 16/08/2026 19:40

caringcarer · 16/08/2026 19:31

From what I gather they have looked at explosion of new claims since COVID for people claiming specifically for ADHD and anxiety. Basically disorders with no objective test. It's not like a blood test, scan image or X-ray can be used to objectively test these disorders. The number of claims for these 2 specific disorders is far higher than in the rest of Europe.

I’m sure Covid did have an impact on our anxiety levels as a country.

I had struggled with low level anxiety my entire life, constant but manageable. Covid worsened it incredibly, the mild social anxiety I had turned into agoraphobia, I developed health anxiety that I’d never had before, my mood dropped drastically and by the end of 2021 I was medicated for the first time ever, waiting forever for online therapy - and I left my now ex husband. I changed my whole job when we went back to hybrid/office working, so I could WFH.

I lived in constant, and I mean constant, fear that I was going to accidentally kill someone’s grandma. When lockdown ended, I didn’t want to go back out and live my previous life, because I was hugely uncomfortable in any populated space, and didn’t want to see anyone beyond my immediate family. I’d avoid them sometimes, if I could.

I’ve kept some of those increased MH issues, 6 years on.

There’s something quite dangerous about already mentally vulnerable people being locked in their houses with their own thoughts.

I’m not on PIP, but I don’t think we need to think very hard to work out why a worldwide pandemic might have worsened MH.

Twogreenbottles · 16/08/2026 19:40

Simonjt · 16/08/2026 17:31

BMW also aren’t available on motability, so very odd @Twogreenbottles is pretending they are.

https://www.motaclarity.co.uk/bmw-motability-cars

Myli1 · 16/08/2026 19:41

This is very typical Populist politics. It’s just back-of-a-fag-packet stuff. Nothing is worked out or calculated properly, they just come up with any old shite that they think people want to hear.

Simonjt · 16/08/2026 19:42

Twogreenbottles · 16/08/2026 19:40

Edited

I don’t click dodgy links. But if you have evidence that BMW weren’t removed in 2025 you could screenshot that info and post it.

TemperanceWest · 16/08/2026 19:43

Gooseling · 16/08/2026 18:57

I do indeed, whilst dropping my walking PIP stick and quickly picking it back up whilst announcing to the whole bus queue “oooh whoops! There goes my PIP stick!” Wink wink.

🤣

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.