Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be fed up of hearing 'just get on with it'?

622 replies

glitterpaperchain · 24/06/2026 16:48

This kind of 'just get on with it' RE the heat is all over Facebook. People talking about the heat in 1976 and saying 'we just got on with it' or 'we muddled through' (as if people didn't die as a result of that heatwave)

My issue is - shouldn't we as a society be aiming higher than just getting on with things and muddling through? We should be campaigning for better infrastructure, better working practices.

I just think we have all this technology, we're supposed to be a rich country, let's fight to make things better rather than just managing. What happened to the spirit of the first union workers who demanded better conditions and rights? I want to see that spirit back.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
WimbyAce · 25/06/2026 19:04

Think I must have blanked out 2022 as I don't remember it at all!

Yourhairbobblesarefantastic · 25/06/2026 19:05

We aren't a rich country. The country is on its knees and giving handouts to illegal immigrants etc. Don't even get me started.

RobinEllacotStrike · 25/06/2026 19:06

The unions are all too busy trying to destroy womens rights, to care about workers rights anymore

glitterpaperchain · 25/06/2026 19:08

MightyDandelionEsq · 25/06/2026 18:41

Respectfully, the NHS can’t seem to cope when it’s business as usual so it’s getting hard to tell when they are having an actual emergency.

You're so close to getting it

OP posts:
glitterpaperchain · 25/06/2026 19:15

Dinosaurhearmeroar · 25/06/2026 18:53

Yanbu. That twat on lbc who said we are raising a nation of melts by shutting schools really irked me. Try teaching 30 kids in 38 degree classrooms! It’s awful. The kids are in a bad way and they’re little - shouldn’t just “get on with it.”

This is another example, though I didn't bring it up as I didn't want to derail and just have a thread with people arguing about schools. But yes, when people say about primary aged children in particular 'they'll manage' - shouldn't we have higher expectations than our children just managing?

I find it depressing, people are so disillusioned they've lost the will to fight for better or forgotten that's an option.

OP posts:
StarCourt · 25/06/2026 19:15

SandyHappy · 25/06/2026 18:58

Air conditioning is not for the rich though. We're not rich by any means, got an old car, don't go on foreign holidays etc, but we bought a unit when we had our DD 5 years ago, it was £500, you can buy the units now for £250/£300 and they are honestly a game changer.

We also have dogs and after years of putting up with in and 'getting on with it' I decided to bite the bullet and have never looked back. I honestly don't know why so many people torture themselves in the heat when the option to have air con in your house is so cheap now, we only use ours around 10-20 days in the year but I wouldn't be without it now.

It’s only cheap compared to what it used to be. It doesn’t mean everybody who’s too hot can afford to buy and run it. You know, cost of living crisis etc

glitterpaperchain · 25/06/2026 19:18

MightyDandelionEsq · 25/06/2026 18:55

I think you forget that most of the govt are wealthy so they won’t shoot themselves in the foot.

When the mansion tax came out by Reeves it conveniently changed the limit so that Starmer and Lammys houses didn’t get sucked into it.

Look how much people like Cameron and Blair are worth. Look at their business conflicts on the govt pages and you’ll see a lot of it matches the policies they force through (Cameron and wind farm subsidies, his FIL owned wind farms I believe which he had investment in).

Wealth has legs and for all the chatter about taxing it, you won’t catch it due to havens like Monaco. You risk those business owners and wealth creators (whether you like them or not they create jobs) just leaving Britain which a lot have/are. Look at James Dyson for example and now JCB and Rolls Royce are talking about it. So eat the rich, tax the rich etc is just an ideological view in my opinion (just an opinion).

We do however need to drastically reduce spending and put a rocket up the economy which is a mess. Wasn’t it something like 25% young people are NEETS? That’s ridiculous.

This is it 100%. I have a family member who used to work with NEETs and help them get into work or training. That project doesn't exist anymore, funding cut, so my family member and all of their colleagues have stopped that work. And now we have a youth unemployment crisis. But the ones at the top are even richer. And somehow they've convinced us that the poor are the problem...

OP posts:
venus7 · 25/06/2026 19:18

nearlylovemyusername · 24/06/2026 19:21

we're supposed to be a rich country, let's fight to make things better rather than just managing.

We are not a rich country, by a long stretch.

Fight with whom exactly?

You're freelancer working from home - who should come to your home and fix it for you?

The OP clearly isn't referring to her own needs. There IS such a thing as society.

Dawnintheageofaquariams · 25/06/2026 19:20

Ablondiebutagoody · 24/06/2026 17:34

You mentioned 1976. Yes, it's currently hot, but hasn't been this hot for 50 years. Spending a load of money on infrastructure would be an overreaction in my opinion.

It was this hot 4 years ago.
Of the top ten hottest recorded temperatures, 6 are in the last six years.
Dolt.

glitterpaperchain · 25/06/2026 19:21

Yourhairbobblesarefantastic · 25/06/2026 19:05

We aren't a rich country. The country is on its knees and giving handouts to illegal immigrants etc. Don't even get me started.

Oh don't worry, I do not want to get you started

OP posts:
JenniferBooth · 25/06/2026 19:21

Campingintherain2024 · 25/06/2026 19:02

I often find those who want change, want it for people like themselves and sod everyone else. They're happy to order out because its too hot for them to cook, sod the chefs. They expect food in the supermarkets at a low cost, sod those working in the fields. I can't imagine they'd be happy with all of the armed forces upping and going home.

Changes aren't always practical or even possible. Where they are there will be a increased cost to everyone. And then i'm sure itll be the same people moaning about the cost of living increase.

Ive just bought cold food like quiche and salad. I have other food but it is too hot to cook in my first floor flat Cant exactly open the back door to let some of the heat out 🙄

JenniferBooth · 25/06/2026 19:23

glitterpaperchain · 25/06/2026 19:15

This is another example, though I didn't bring it up as I didn't want to derail and just have a thread with people arguing about schools. But yes, when people say about primary aged children in particular 'they'll manage' - shouldn't we have higher expectations than our children just managing?

I find it depressing, people are so disillusioned they've lost the will to fight for better or forgotten that's an option.

Lots of "they will manage" from parents

Yet us who have chosen to remain child free are told that WE are the ones who hate kids!

BrokenWingsCantFly · 25/06/2026 19:24

glitterpaperchain · 24/06/2026 18:50

It's hard to tell really what point you're making. You say 'well what do you want to government to do about it?' and then you provide good suggestions. Yes, those things.

There are subsidies for things like solar panels and insulation, this could include things like solar powered air con units, they can be installed in vulnerable spaces like schools. I don't want to hear 'there's no money' as a reason not to do something necessary. But I won't derail the thread with my thoughts on freeing up/finding more public money.

More guidance for schools to follow on when to close. Legislation for workplaces like a maximum legal temperature, so workplaces either need to close or ensure the workplace is cooled. Maybe a warm weather equivalent of winter fuel allowance to help vulnerable elderly people.

There's plenty the government can do.

I think it is you who is struggling to make it clear what point you are making. Not the 2 PP you have quoted now asking what do you want the government to do.

Your original post you said we are a rich country and government should improve infrastructure. Your post before this 1 you said the government don't have the money to extend air-conditioning to every school class.

It is only in this post you said about setting maximum working temperatures. Which does seem the only reasonable suggestion given the billions it would cost to adapt every building to be able to keep temperatures cool for the very few days that would be needed each year.

The money is not there for that. As much as I'm not a fan of the current government, they do provide funding to someway contribute towards global warming, but they can't fund every building being adapted for every situation.

I agree in principle with a maximum heat for working conditions. However problems with that are emergency services still expected to work. Chefs would pretty much never have a day in work. I was in that role for many years, a heat rash halfway through shift was common (even in winter) with temperatures rising to 45 degrees in the kitchen some days. Can imagine there would be many complaints if max temperatures were insisted upon around no emergency services, no care home staff, food barely being served at restaurants, no pubs open to enjoy the beer garden weather, nothing open in tourist resorts, no shops open to collect the BBQ food or drinks for the garden. Then you have got those working in hot manufacturing conditions which is the main reason this impossible be rolled out.

Whenever people look at situations like this, they only think of their own experiences or the most common to them. You can't have 1 rule for most but for the things you enjoy or need, those workers have to crack on

This weather is for a few days. If you don't like it or can't cope (not denying many cant) then phone in sick if you must, invest in your own air-con unit, keep the curtains slightly closed and it will all be over in a few days

ThreadGuardDog · 25/06/2026 19:25

glitterpaperchain · 24/06/2026 16:48

This kind of 'just get on with it' RE the heat is all over Facebook. People talking about the heat in 1976 and saying 'we just got on with it' or 'we muddled through' (as if people didn't die as a result of that heatwave)

My issue is - shouldn't we as a society be aiming higher than just getting on with things and muddling through? We should be campaigning for better infrastructure, better working practices.

I just think we have all this technology, we're supposed to be a rich country, let's fight to make things better rather than just managing. What happened to the spirit of the first union workers who demanded better conditions and rights? I want to see that spirit back.

I remember the heatwave of 1976 very well’. It went on for months, but I don’t remember it being the constantly searing heat and humidity we’ve experienced lately. I think posting ‘just get on with it’ via SM is the definition of stupidity when there are red and amber heat warnings everywhere.

ThreadGuardDog · 25/06/2026 19:26

glitterpaperchain · 25/06/2026 19:21

Oh don't worry, I do not want to get you started

Glad about that because I think we’re one step away from posters turning this into yet another benefit bashing thread.

CalliopeFosterBeauchamp · 25/06/2026 19:26

Darragon · 24/06/2026 16:51

We’re not a rich country though our tax take doesn’t cover our expenditures. Maybe if we stopped making every minor inconvenience a problem for the government to solve we’d be better off.

Heat like this isn’t a “minor inconvenience”. It kills people.

TBH, I can’t see human beings getting on top of climate change now. It’s very nearly too late anyway - plus we’re fundamentally selfish and we’re too used to convenience.

I think what will happen is that these 40+ degree temperatures will become more normal over the next decade or two. More people will die. Food prices will continue to increase. Only when these things inconvenience us personally do people tend to take action (even if that action is just to vote differently).

As for the government’s role - yes, some of it is down to them. We’re going to need air con in public buildings and in schools and hospitals at some point. Yes, those will be paid for by local authorities and health trusts, but it’s still money from tax.

Food bank use will increase as prices go up, and so will use of warm banks in winter. I can foresee a time when these need to be subsidised by the government to prevent high numbers of deaths.

I imagine things that we see as ‘essential’ now, like short haul flights and more than one car per household will be very heavily
taxed because of the environmental impact.

Some of it will be down to the individual of course - rich people will be able to afford houses with air con, electric cars, foreign holidays. The rest of us won’t, just as we can’t now.

ThesebeautifulthingsthatIvegot · 25/06/2026 19:27

Ablondiebutagoody · 24/06/2026 17:34

You mentioned 1976. Yes, it's currently hot, but hasn't been this hot for 50 years. Spending a load of money on infrastructure would be an overreaction in my opinion.

Yes it has. It was 42 degrees in July 2022. This week is a "mere" 36.

Charliebear201 · 25/06/2026 19:27

I agree and I don't. My daughters school announced today they are closing tomorrow. I now have to take an unpaid day off work. I am a Nurse in the private sector. Because I am now not going to work, the unit I work in will be short staffed meaning patient care will be affected. I would have been along with my colleagues, working in a uniform so thick it could stand up on its own. Would I have been hot? Yes!!! Do we get in with it? YES!!!!! So it annoys me that schools can't and as a result, our family have a reduced income next month whilst patients I care deeply for are suffering. So should we find a way to function, yes!! Is it hard, Yes!!! But I agree better contingencys beed to be put in place so this level of disruption in heat doesn't happen again. As some families are already stretched to the max financially and the school closures (teachers still being paid might I add) do not help

glitterpaperchain · 25/06/2026 19:28

BrokenWingsCantFly · 25/06/2026 19:24

I think it is you who is struggling to make it clear what point you are making. Not the 2 PP you have quoted now asking what do you want the government to do.

Your original post you said we are a rich country and government should improve infrastructure. Your post before this 1 you said the government don't have the money to extend air-conditioning to every school class.

It is only in this post you said about setting maximum working temperatures. Which does seem the only reasonable suggestion given the billions it would cost to adapt every building to be able to keep temperatures cool for the very few days that would be needed each year.

The money is not there for that. As much as I'm not a fan of the current government, they do provide funding to someway contribute towards global warming, but they can't fund every building being adapted for every situation.

I agree in principle with a maximum heat for working conditions. However problems with that are emergency services still expected to work. Chefs would pretty much never have a day in work. I was in that role for many years, a heat rash halfway through shift was common (even in winter) with temperatures rising to 45 degrees in the kitchen some days. Can imagine there would be many complaints if max temperatures were insisted upon around no emergency services, no care home staff, food barely being served at restaurants, no pubs open to enjoy the beer garden weather, nothing open in tourist resorts, no shops open to collect the BBQ food or drinks for the garden. Then you have got those working in hot manufacturing conditions which is the main reason this impossible be rolled out.

Whenever people look at situations like this, they only think of their own experiences or the most common to them. You can't have 1 rule for most but for the things you enjoy or need, those workers have to crack on

This weather is for a few days. If you don't like it or can't cope (not denying many cant) then phone in sick if you must, invest in your own air-con unit, keep the curtains slightly closed and it will all be over in a few days

There is a maximum legal working temperature in Spain. They manage to keep chefs and care staff working.

Your post is exactly an example of what I'm talking about....'oh it's hard/awkward so let's not bother trying to improve things'

OP posts:
ThreadGuardDog · 25/06/2026 19:28

Dawnintheageofaquariams · 25/06/2026 19:20

It was this hot 4 years ago.
Of the top ten hottest recorded temperatures, 6 are in the last six years.
Dolt.

Edited

I think the poster was speaking generally, as in circa 50 years. I remember 1976, the heatwave was prolonged but it wasn’t nearly as hot as it’s been recently. I think that was the point.

glitterpaperchain · 25/06/2026 19:29

ThreadGuardDog · 25/06/2026 19:26

Glad about that because I think we’re one step away from posters turning this into yet another benefit bashing thread.

Yes, and immigrants

OP posts:
bafta16 · 25/06/2026 19:30

I do find that we’ve hit a place where a lot of previous generations who suffered seem to now want the next generation to suffer

Can you expand on this please?

ThreadGuardDog · 25/06/2026 19:32

ThesebeautifulthingsthatIvegot · 25/06/2026 19:27

Yes it has. It was 42 degrees in July 2022. This week is a "mere" 36.

And yet the met office is advising that today’s temperatures of 36.5 - in Surrey I believe - broke the record held since 1976.

JenniferBooth · 25/06/2026 19:32

ThreadGuardDog · 25/06/2026 19:26

Glad about that because I think we’re one step away from posters turning this into yet another benefit bashing thread.

That happened last night <snort>

August1980 · 25/06/2026 19:33

I am from a hot country. It’s actually getting hotter there too and they just get on with it I suppose. I am in the UK and because I don’t know any better, I am getting on with it too! The grow egg in my child’s room is saying 31! Husband is away and he didn’t turn the aga down! I think it can go lower. Although it’s breezy in the house, I am running between floors trying to keep said baby and my senior (stubborn) black Labrador cool! Did other practical things this week like put the gazebo out at the side of the house through the garage. Not the best view but very cool for doggy pool and baby to play. Took doggy and baby for a walk at 5.40am before the sun was up! Sorted out food earlier in the week so had watermelon, salad stuff etc on hand so no need to drive anywhere. Thursdays are baby’s only free days so it was just a coincidence we didn’t have to get in the car! I also work - full time but from home so appreciate I had more time to prepare/get on with it!
i really just wanted to say if you feel that strongly take on the challenge to do something about it - that’s how change happens. When you care enough - we will all back you, OP. You already have the makings of a politician! Taking about change yet not wanting to tackle it!

Swipe left for the next trending thread