Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think these boys should have been incarcerated?

762 replies

newrubylane · 21/05/2026 14:06

BBC News - Teenage boys sentenced for raping lone girls
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clypg68e2neo

I've never started an AIBU before, but I'm genuinely really shocked. I'm just not sure how this sentence is justifiable. Their actions were premeditated and deliberate, they were carrying a knife and they filmed themselves. They're obviously a danger to women/girls, and probably to other boys too.

If anyone knows how and why this sentence might have come about, I'd be interested to hear it.

A footpath beside a river, leading under a road bridge

Teenage boys sentenced for raping lone girls in Fordingbridge

The boys filmed themselves laughing and encouraging each other as they raped girls in separate attacks.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clypg68e2neo

OP posts:
Thread gallery
37
FinchiePink · 21/05/2026 14:56

TheJuryIsOut · 21/05/2026 14:54

I couldn't give a flying fuck what mitigating factors there is, please tell me what you think would be a good excuse for these boys to have done this?

You're confusing mitigating factors in sentencing with justification or excuses for the crime. They are not the same, as I suspect you know.

There are both mitigating and aggravating factors, both of which will be taken into account for determining a sentence.

JLou08 · 21/05/2026 14:57

Backedoffhackedoff · 21/05/2026 14:50

I’m afraid I agree we shouldn’t criminalise children

I think their risk to women/ the public and their progress in rehabilitation needs to be carefully assessed, and I would advocate on the side of caution with that- but not that they should be criminalised. It’s just not effective

What about justice for the victims?
I don't usually agree with criminalising children but these cases are horrific. The girls deserve justice and the rest of society needs to be protected. This was premeditated, there can't have been any real remorse for them to post it online and offend again. They are dangerous boys who have probably destroyed the lives of two girls and the victims parents too.

canuckup · 21/05/2026 14:57

And their mothers are relieved they won't get a prison sentence????

ImWearingPantaloons · 21/05/2026 14:57

Form completed.

I am so angry at reading the details of the case.

RingoJuice · 21/05/2026 14:57

Backedoffhackedoff · 21/05/2026 14:50

I’m afraid I agree we shouldn’t criminalise children

I think their risk to women/ the public and their progress in rehabilitation needs to be carefully assessed, and I would advocate on the side of caution with that- but not that they should be criminalised. It’s just not effective

Criminalize children?

Im sorry, but if you are old enough to rape girls and invite your friends to come rape with you, you are old enough to face the consequences.

These boys will have experienced what a joke the criminal justice system is, and they will go on and hurt others. And people like you will have enabled it

FinchiePink · 21/05/2026 14:57

Monty36 · 21/05/2026 14:55

The fifteen year old you have to wonder if he was fit for trial. Their learning difficulties / ADHD were assessed as being in the bottom 1% for their age.

Where have you seen this, please? I haven't seen any commentary to this effect.

FernandoSor · 21/05/2026 14:57

TheJuryIsOut · 21/05/2026 14:55

Ah right that's ok then. Let's just look forward to the future of boys gang raping girls with no actual consequences for them to worry about. Fabulous.

I did not say it was ok. I made a factual observation.

canuckup · 21/05/2026 14:58

Shouldn't crimilalise children??

They are guilty of premeditated rape????

TheJuryIsOut · 21/05/2026 14:58

FinchiePink · 21/05/2026 14:56

You're confusing mitigating factors in sentencing with justification or excuses for the crime. They are not the same, as I suspect you know.

There are both mitigating and aggravating factors, both of which will be taken into account for determining a sentence.

For a crime like this I truly believe there shouldn't be room for mitigating factors. It literally doesn't matter.

Backedoffhackedoff · 21/05/2026 14:59

Cartmella · 21/05/2026 14:52

But if you don't criminslise the boys there is zero deterrent. Other boys will commit gang rapes now. Guaranteed.

It wasn’t a deterrent to stop them in the first place was it? They surely knew rape comes with a jail sentence they certainly didn’t know what their outcome would be

RingoJuice · 21/05/2026 14:59

Monty36 · 21/05/2026 14:55

The fifteen year old you have to wonder if he was fit for trial. Their learning difficulties / ADHD were assessed as being in the bottom 1% for their age.

Criminals are usually low IQ. So this is no surprise.

coulditbeme2323 · 21/05/2026 15:01

I wonder where they are from.

cantthinkofagoodusername1 · 21/05/2026 15:02

I have also submitted a form. This is utterly horrific and there is no way the offenders will not go on to commit more gang rapes against children

Monty36 · 21/05/2026 15:02

FinchiePink · 21/05/2026 14:57

Where have you seen this, please? I haven't seen any commentary to this effect.

LBC news.

Lifeomars · 21/05/2026 15:02

Truly horrific on every level, horrific premeditated crimes which the vile perpatrators filmed, horrific ordeal for the victims who endured the attacks and then have been totally betrayed by the criminal justice system and horrifically inappropriate sentence. This is one of the worst things I have read in a while

OrigamiOwls · 21/05/2026 15:02

Feels like teenage boys have just been given a license to rape teenage girls, as there aren't going to be any consequences for them 🤷🏻‍♀️

DisappearingGirl · 21/05/2026 15:03

These boys were 14, 14 and 13 when they gang raped two separate young girls in premeditated attacks.

To my mind they should receive a pretty severe sentence where they are essentially locked away for a good few years. I'd be in favour of them receiving rehabilitation and education while they are there, in the hope they can re-enter society.

But they cannot be seen to just get away with this with almost no consequences. Those poor girls.

BridgetPhillipsonIsACowardlyJobsworth · 21/05/2026 15:03

AlcoholicAntibiotic · 21/05/2026 14:51

So criminalise their parents instead.

Because clearly if they think rape is OK something’s gone very wrong.

This, absolutely. If a boy is too young to be imprisoned after ruining a girl's life in this horrendous way, then send both parents to prison, as though they had committed the rape themselves.

Society is raising a generation of boys for whom there are no consequences (I would consider a loss of their freedom the least amount of punishment they should have received). And raising a generation of girls who know that boys can act with impunity, while they suffer lifelong whatever those boys decide to inflict upon them (while, at the same time, learning that "no" isn't kind and, besides, doesn't apply to boys).

And people wonder why society is in the mess it's in.

Ohcrap082024 · 21/05/2026 15:04

FinchiePink · 21/05/2026 14:56

You're confusing mitigating factors in sentencing with justification or excuses for the crime. They are not the same, as I suspect you know.

There are both mitigating and aggravating factors, both of which will be taken into account for determining a sentence.

But judges do sometimes get this wrong. Sentencing guidelines are not always correctly and consistently applied. That’s why we have a system in place to request a sentence review.

I have submitted a review request because I think the judge may have been too lenient in his application of the sentencing guidelines. As is my right as an adult citizen of the UK.

latetothefisting · 21/05/2026 15:05

AplineDaisies · 21/05/2026 14:47

Please can someone post the link for complaining and the relevant info e.g case reference no

Link has been posted above - I just put the rapists in Fordingbridge case (anonymised due to their age). You don't need the case ref but the court is Southampton and the date of sentencing is today - it doesn't ask for any other identifying info.

I understand the rationale behind wanting to keep under 18s out of prison but their poor victims were the same age or younger and will be suffering a life sentence - the rapists being "heavily supervised" is not a punishment.

I wrote on one of the other threads about the judges remark "I should avoid criminalising these children unnecessarily and understand the effects of their behaviour and support their reintegration into society."if you've been convicted of a crime, doesn't that automatically make you a CRIMINAL? No "unnecessary" about it.

I have a little bit of experience with criminal cases so usually give outrage over lenient sentences the benefit of the doubt but this has really enraged me. I think it's the fact it happened twice. AND they filmed it AND shared it after.

How does that indicate remorse or potential for learning and growth? why would we want people like that being reintegrated into our society, particularly with the idea that they can get away with the same behaviour again without being punished?

MyNameIsTina · 21/05/2026 15:05

Peer pressure made them do it, apparently. Well surely a nice spell in a YOI would spread the word that rape isn't the one. That poor victim, writing a poem about not being afraid of dying now, having to see the boys basically get off with it.

Allisnotlost1 · 21/05/2026 15:06

FinchiePink · 21/05/2026 14:40

I suspect we won't get the full sentencing remarks for a while. As you say, a custodial sentence could have been imposed, but as per the guidelines you link to a custodial sentence is really the absolute last resort and will try to be avoided:

"If a custodial sentence is imposed, the court must state its reasons for being satisfied that the offence is so serious that no other sanction would be appropriate and, in particular, why a YRO with ISS or fostering could not be justified."

I would guess significant reduction in sentence was applied due to the ages (the boys would have been 13 / 14 at the time they committed these crimes). Whether there are other mitigation factors like learning disabilities is unknown (at least I haven't seen anything).

I have seen many boys sentenced to long prison sentences for rapes with fewer aggravating features.

Frankly I’m astonished, and the judges comment re ‘criminalising’ makes me think he has missed a step somewhere. These boys will always be convicted of rape, it will always be disclosable. Presumably he means he must avoid unnecessarily punishing them, but that probably didn’t sound very good.

StellaOlivetti · 21/05/2026 15:06

God that’s awful.
I have submitted an undue leniency form.
@Swiftie1878 , I just put ‘I don’t know’ in the box asking for names, and identified the case in the free text box.

Sartre · 21/05/2026 15:07

Truly hope this is appealed. I can’t quite fathom what I’ve just read to be honest. What would the boys actually have had to do to be jailed? Killed the girls? Is gang rape and assault not enough now? The judge should feel ashamed. Those poor girls and their parents too.

This also should be shared with teenage girls so they can comprehend the dangers of meeting strangers from Snapchat and similar.