Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU for making DD12 give up her treat for eating more than her share of a takeaway?

658 replies

SongsOfSongs · 12/05/2026 09:23

My DD12 is a big eater and honestly can be quite greedy. She has often tried to take more than her fair share when sharing food with her sister DD11. This weekend, we ordered takeaway and there was a side for the two of them to share. Typically they will divide the side up to start with so there are no complaints about either of them eating too much of it. However, we were in the middle of watching a movie when the food came. I told DD12 to divide the side up and she said "oh, it's ok, we can share it reasonably" and I said fine since we were in a hurry. Maybe 10 minutes later I look and she has eaten all but 2 pieces of the side (out of 30 maybe?). I ask DD11 if she's had any and she bursts into tears and says no. DD12 says sorry repeatedly and that she didn't mean to do it.

It wasn't something that was easy to rectify at the time, so we said that DD12 would owe DD11 something. DD12 is in secondary school and gets an extra pound or so each week to spend on a treat at lunchtime on Wednesdays. AIBU to tell DD12 that she needs to buy the Wednesday treat and bring it home for her sister tomorrow? If there is a better suggestion, please let me know!

OP posts:
FunMustard · 14/05/2026 17:57

Well I'm glad all the 11 and 12 year olds you know are completely sensible and level-headed, but I've personally not known one myself!

Also - OP probably wouldn't have worded her post in the way she did if this was the first and only time this had happened.

Terfarina · 14/05/2026 23:37

SnappyQuoter · 13/05/2026 08:06

No. They’re 1 year apart in age, and OP has said repeatedly that the younger one wanted her share but just eats her in a different order. She has also been very clear that there was plenty of other food and the older girl could have had another side dish made from food in the house. This is not an issue of a lack of food and a hungry kid. This was treat food, which is always split evenly. If anyone is still
hungry, they can go and eat anything else but they cannot eat someone else’s share of the treat.

This is an utterly insane thread. No wonder so many kids are so selfish because their being raised by the nutters on here who cannot wrap their heads about splitting things fairly when it’s a treat, and eating something else if you’re still hungry. And all the people
who think a 12 year old cannot possibly be expected to only take her half of a dish?… it’s idiocy. Just a completely bonkers thread which really shows why teachers are leaving in droves because nowadays have such terrible behaviours.

How is it so complicated to understand that when a treat is bought, you say to you kids “take half each.” No one is being starved. No one is being treated badly. The only one who failed here is a 12 year old who took 28 pieces and left her sister 2. It is completely unacceptable for a 12 year old to be unable to share, to be unable to look at a serving and take her half and leave the other half for the other person to take whenever they want. It is completely unacceptable behaviour, and at that age is the totally inappropriate. She is old enough to understand and be conscious is others and only taking her share.

I’ve been reading this thread open mouthed at some of the replies. My kids are 14 and 12. Both boys. We always serve food in the middle of the table so everyone takes their share. I have never ever had this issue. It so basic. It’s like, one of the most basic social things a kid learns.

Do people here not take their kids for tapas or meze? Do you not even sometimes make your dinner with lots of sides and put them all on the table for everyone to take their share? No sharing breads, or cheesy fondue? Even afternoon tea - scones, sandwiches, cakes all put out on the table for the kids to have a nice treat? Even when we go to the beach, we put all the pic Nic food out on the table on Tupperware and everyone serves themselves and no one ever takes more than their portion until everyone has eaten, and then they’ll ask if they can have the last of X. That’s been my kid’s their whole lives because it’s a totally normal way to eat, with family and friends.

But I guess you lot really are just eating a slab of meat and a pile of potatoes on your own wee plate every night.

Edited

That’s not what this is though. A shared meal over a table / picnic blanket is a more mindful social occasion than scoffing takeaway in front of the television.

My older kids are in their 20s now. We’ve frequently eaten tapas style at the table and sharing isn’t an issue. They used to have their Xbox in the dining room and would mindlessly demolish the fruit bowl while playing, I doubt either had a clue what the other was eating and if the younger had cried because the older had eaten all the grapes, for example, I wouldn’t have been so draconian as to set a punishment for a few days time. But them I like and love them equally.

Holdinguphalfthesky · 15/05/2026 08:04

FlowerSticker · 14/05/2026 17:24

The consequence is that she doesn't get to say she can be trusted to share again... 🤷‍♀️

Any fall out with the sister van be dealt with between themselves.

I think that approach has the potential to create a worse scenario.

In your suggestion, the dominant personality has the opportunity to just steamroller over their sibling (and it would happen- the scoffing of all the treat food was essentially a more dominant personality using that to their own advantage in the first place). The other sibling could end up feeling very resentful or downtrodden.

There needs to be some sort of resolution that allows both siblings to feel it’s a fair outcome, the sister who missed out should feel supported and the sister who took advantage able to admit wrongdoing and make appropriate amends, and the parents are right to step in and lead that process.

youlookradishing · 15/05/2026 08:15

Having children ‘owe’ each other food is weird.

She has apologised. That is the end of it.

In future, one divides, the other chooses her portion.

Also in future - consider purchasing more food. Your eldest seems to be hungry. A side each next time.

pottylolly · 16/05/2026 09:54

Honestly, OP, if your 11 yo is overweight as you said then she probably just needs to be left to regulate her own intake and not ‘reminded’ to eat. Her being ‘sporty’ by her own reckoning (you said she says she’s always running) when she isn’t doing this outside of school suggests she probably isn’t and if left to her own devices would eat to her own devices. Your 12 yo being slim and hungry means you do need to order extra food for her.

Banannanana · 18/05/2026 13:04

One splits and the other chooses in future.

Never see a fairer split than when you do that!

FlowerSticker · 18/05/2026 15:29

pottylolly · 16/05/2026 09:54

Honestly, OP, if your 11 yo is overweight as you said then she probably just needs to be left to regulate her own intake and not ‘reminded’ to eat. Her being ‘sporty’ by her own reckoning (you said she says she’s always running) when she isn’t doing this outside of school suggests she probably isn’t and if left to her own devices would eat to her own devices. Your 12 yo being slim and hungry means you do need to order extra food for her.

Agreed, doing 1 hr of sport outside of school a week is not remotely sporty... That's like the bare minimum activity of what she should be doing daily...

Cakeandcardio · Today 21:50

SongsOfSongs · 12/05/2026 10:44

People jump to so many conclusions on here, yet it always still manages to shock me a bit!

No, I am not concerned about DD12's weight (she is quite thin) and they had sushi and edamame from the takeaway. We get a takeaway once or twice a month.

Edited

Well I did say IF you are concerned.

But takeaways twice a month is still a lot IMO. I was actually only saying IF you are concerned though because you seemed to jump right in with the punishment and never really considered if she was hungry, which is surely, surely the first logical step in this scenario?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread