Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Is MN feeding unhealthy attitudes towards men?

538 replies

Grtscott · 01/04/2026 09:07

Some threads I've read this morning have helped me to realise that my thinking about men has changed since joining MN. And not in a good way.

There's an undertone that men need to do things the woman's way, or it's wrong. That men should be grateful for any sex that women are willing to give in a long term relationship, even if that peters out to no sex at all.

Men are seen to be babies who can't do anything for themselves, and need to have someone pre plan and organise their lives, but god forbid they fall into the pattern of behaviour of expecting their female partner to do these things for them, as that's what they've always done.

This thinking is observable to a greater or lesser extent across the boards.

I've also recognised where this thinking has affected the way I think about my wonderful man, and sometimes in things I've said to him or actions towards him. I need to watch this in future.

I'm concerned that the general thinking about men on this website can't be good for society if this is the way women think, and are encouraged to think by others.

If women treat men this way collectively and have low expectations around them, no wonder the bar is getting lower.

OP posts:
Carla786 · 01/04/2026 22:23

OtterlyAstounding · 01/04/2026 19:46

It's cute that you think men don't talk negatively about women they're not interested in. Hell, they'll use degrading, dehumanising language about women they are interested in, and often volunteer it – making unwanted and unnecessary commentary about how women in the public eye look and whether they'd fuck them.

Women on Mumsnet tend to only talk negatively about men with traits they're not attracted to if asked what they think of that trait.

I think she was talking hypothetically rather than saying men in general don't do that.

Carla786 · 01/04/2026 22:26

Mengo · 01/04/2026 20:43

I haven’t heard this at all. The worst vitriol I’ve heard is routinely handed out to female politicians, far worse than the male ones, and particularly from men!

Having worked in a male dominated environment for decades I manage to see them with their respectable faces off, being the only woman there I’m now an honorary man and they don’t try to be decent for me like they do their wives, sisters, mothers and friends. It’s eye opening and is 100% why I’ve lost all respect for most men and will never have a relationship with one ever again. Loads of women are totally deluded about the men in their lives and how they behave/talk when pack mentality takes over.

Yes, I do think a lot of women are naive about how men talk to each other in male environments or online forums. Otoh I suspect some don't like it so much as go along with it to show they're one of the lads, but that's part of the problem. People talk as if female friends groups are the main ones to use peer pressure but it can also be strong among men

echt · 01/04/2026 22:29

Grtscott · 01/04/2026 22:19

Interesting.

There's a good amount of posters on this thread that agree with me, yet you still label it a "me" problem.

Perhaps you need to read an entire thread to properly engage in such discussions, rather than be one of the MN women who try to pile onto a poster who disagrees with them regarding men?

Basically I'm fed up by some women's attitudes on here towards all men and acknowledged today that this attitude is so ingrained in this website it's had a subconscious negative effect on how I think towards men

I've also recognised where this thinking has affected the way I think about my wonderful man, and sometimes in things I've said to him or actions towards him. I need to watch this in future

So it IS a you problem.

The door is that way >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Carla786 · 01/04/2026 22:29

JHound · 01/04/2026 14:35

I genuinely don’t even get why we need to be against it. Everybody had things that attract them and repel them. As long as nobody is harmed then who cares about what people find attractive?

It is just SO weird to me!

I am not going to be with men I am not attracted to to smash the patriarchy!

It’s also another case of women carrying men’s water for them. Men never police each others preferences. Most men (for example) have height preferences yet no man would ever comment on it.

Edited

I think the argument is that therefore short/lower earning etc men find it hard to find partners. But is this really such an issue in real life? Online dating is not real life.

Bertiebiscuit · 01/04/2026 22:30

lemondrivelcake · 01/04/2026 20:45

That was the problem with the poster who tried to tell me there was no such thing, though - she didn't bother to explain her pov at all, it was just 'there's no such thing', end of. I do have to say, though, that although I agree misogyny and misandry aren't exact opposites due to the power imbalance, I disagree that sexism from women towards men doesn't merit its own term.

I think talking about "misandry" is pointless, it doesn't affect men even if it exists, whereas misogyny gets women trafficked, assaulted, raped and murdered. Not the same thing is it.

Carla786 · 01/04/2026 22:37

gannett · 01/04/2026 16:22

The "ick" threads are mostly not about appearance (see: low earning, bisexuality). They're about a masculine ideal just as much as MRA threads about women's appearances are about a feminine ideal.

And again it is the way in which men who fall short of that ideal are talked about, not an individual woman's preference. I personally am not attracted to ginger men. I don't go around talking about that or trying to justify that - I simply don't sleep with them. If I posted online or said out loud that ginger men give me the ick, then I would be a massive twat - and that is what the red flag would be. (See the poster a few above you who implied that bisexual men are riddled with STDs, for instance, and who equated "low-earning" with "lacking ambition".)

This specific point :

'See the poster a few above you who implied that bisexual men are riddled with STDs'

  • I'm bisexual myself , female though. I personally think that to some extent bisexual men as a group have created a rod for their own back. Factually, they are, as a group, more likely to have STDs. Of course many bisexual men are sensible but many are not.

It is also a fact that too many deluded bisexual men call themselves 'straight' and go on Grindr while married. It is a minority but still too many.

All things considered, it IS unfair to say ALL or MOST bi men do this, most do not. But it is NOT unfair to not date them for these reasons.

Carla786 · 01/04/2026 22:39

sugarandcyanide · 01/04/2026 12:38

Absolutely agree. The recent stag do thread about the sex worker abbreviations was full of people saying their partner wouldn't have gone.

Just because someone the OPs partner doesn't even know happens to be going on the same stag do and is planning on using sex workers OPs partner obviously is too. He definitely can't be trusted to go and not do anything wrong! All sorts of people go on stag and hen dos, no-one can control what someone else chooses to do.

Also there's so much hypocrisy. If it's a finances post with a woman saying she doesn't want to spend her life savings on her husband it's her money, if it's a man saying it it's their money.

Yes, but not all stag (or hen) dos involve sex workers. That was a big red flag.

I'm sure some husbands coups be trusted but it still begs the question of why they have such sleazy friends.

And there are studies showing a lot of men DO cheat on stag dos and lie, women on hens to some extent too.

Carla786 · 01/04/2026 22:42

5128gap · 01/04/2026 15:09

I think the idea is that we are attracted to tall, outgoing, confident men because the patriarchal society has convinced us that men should be strong leaders, and women weak and fragile and in need of protection, and that these ideas are to our detriment because they keep us in a subordinate position.
However, my view is that the only people who really suffer from this particular manifestation of patriarchy are men who don't fit the masculine ideal, and I'm not overly concerned about that in all honesty.
Partly because the impact is exaggerated. Short men do get dates, they just maybe have a smaller dating pool than tall ones, and can't get any woman they want.
Partly because I think its a bit of a cheek to set up a society in a way that benefits some men then ask women to make sure that the men it doesn't benefit don't lose out.

To be fair, did men alive now create the patriarchal standards? I think it's difficult to view men now as creating patriarchal ideas like that. Men are born into a system with certain ideas and expectations of them, and women, and they may not necessarily agree. They're not a homogenous group working in concert.

Carla786 · 01/04/2026 22:45

Grtscott · 01/04/2026 16:56

Namechanged for this thread due to sadsacks who go back and check if the poster has posted before, and if so, what they've said.

I've had 5 DMs, yes. I'm not sure that says anything besides 5 people who don't feel they can post their views on a public thread because their opinions go against the grain. I was surprised to find any if I'm honest. People should feel free to post their thoughts directly to the thread but their prior experience of other posters has seemingly left them uncomfortable to do so.

A website like Reddit or Pistonheads doesn't have a figurehead like Justine is for MN. I suspect those sites don't have the opportunity to interview/post questions to government ministers on their forums like MN do, although as a non user of both, I can't say that as a certainty.

All kinds of people do AMAs on Reddit. Both Trump and Obama have. It's huge, especially in the US, billing itself as the 'front page of the internet', and people all around the world use it, 443.8 million per week according to the last count.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=web&rct=j&url=www.interteammarketing.com/blog/reddit-statistics-2026%23:~:text%3DReddit%2520has%2520116%2520million%2520daily,Q3%25202024%2520and%2520Q3%25202025.&ved=2ahUKEwjlhKbbz82TAxXEUkEAHZJcLhwQ1fkOegQIBxAG&opi=89978449&cd&psig=AOvVaw10FVlWRJFkpaNYRMFUhr5g&ust=1775166241694000

It's really not comparable to something like mumsnet.

Pistonheads is smaller, agree on that. Partly because it started as a car-focused website, I think .

5128gap · 01/04/2026 22:47

Carla786 · 01/04/2026 22:42

To be fair, did men alive now create the patriarchal standards? I think it's difficult to view men now as creating patriarchal ideas like that. Men are born into a system with certain ideas and expectations of them, and women, and they may not necessarily agree. They're not a homogenous group working in concert.

If men didn't agree with patriarchy, then we wouldn't have patriarchy anymore. The only ones who don't agree with it are the ones who are not only the victims of it, but have the insight to see that its the reason for their plight. Most men benefit from it more than they lose. Most of the ones who lose don't blame it. They blame us.

TooBigForMyBoots · 01/04/2026 22:47

Grtscott · 01/04/2026 10:43

That last example is the one that irks me the most. There's been so many threads I've read on MN which have this theme of "I've chosen for our marriage to be sexless, how dare he choose to discuss opening up our marriage." And other women supporting that view.

It's what I read between the lines of the "Would he really be that stupid?" thread, although the poster hasn't said that directly.

And several posters ignoring that the OP on that thread hasn't got the right to tell XH not to date.

I completely agree that the OP needs to take control of the situation and end things herself rather than be his puppet, but I'm thinking there's a few things the OP hasn't said as she understandably is wanting others to be as cross at him as she is.

Edited

I'm am fully supportive of people calling out awful male behaviour and supporting women in recognising that for what it is and helping them address it in whichever way is appropriate.

Huh? You aren't at all supportive of the OP of that thread, where the man's behaviour is really, really unpleasant.

canuckup · 01/04/2026 22:48

🤣 🤣 😂

Carla786 · 01/04/2026 22:48

5128gap · 01/04/2026 22:47

If men didn't agree with patriarchy, then we wouldn't have patriarchy anymore. The only ones who don't agree with it are the ones who are not only the victims of it, but have the insight to see that its the reason for their plight. Most men benefit from it more than they lose. Most of the ones who lose don't blame it. They blame us.

Can you elaborate a bit more on what you mean by patriarchy? The UK isn't a formal patriarchy, women have equal legal rights.

Do you mean more in the sense of ongoing discrimination, VAWG ?

Carla786 · 01/04/2026 22:49

CharlotteRumpling · 01/04/2026 15:53

Have never yet seen ' all men are arseholes" on MN, and I have been here since 2004, I think. And yes, male dominated sites like Reddit or 4 chan do get a huge voice.

It's so odd- in a world where VAWG is a huge issue- to pat yourself on the back for saying " all men are not arseholes" and do a clenched fist. We know that.

Yes I think OP is naive about Reddit. It is huge in the US in a way that really isn't comparable to mumsnet, and globally influential.

Carla786 · 01/04/2026 22:53

AntiqueBabyLoanSmurf · 01/04/2026 12:45

Yes, I hate that too - I find it really creepy when posters automatically jump to that conclusion.

I wonder if some of those people insisting that looking after children is exclusively the preserve of women then go on to blast men for essentially agreeing with them and seeing it as 'women's work' and leaving them to it.

I think you're missing the point that there's evidence that paedophiles are deliberately trying to work in nurseries. Most posters don't object to men in schools, just nurseries where children are nonverbal so extra vulnerable.

Men doing childcare for their own children is different, there's not the same issue of predators seeking out in such numbers.

Carla786 · 01/04/2026 22:55

gannett · 01/04/2026 12:59

Exactly.

Misandry doesn't exist in the same sense that racism against white people doesn't exist and snobbery against rich people doesn't exist.

Racism against white people can exist: Rotherham gangs, for one.

Morepositivemum · 01/04/2026 22:59

I think people come into mn for help so you won’t hear about the everyday men/dhes/dads, you just see ranting. Saying that I’ve seen some horrible comments from men (and actually gotten 2 horrible dms from men), but then some of the women on here make me wonder are we from a different planet too, so cruel and mean. I think mn can just be a very tough place (but amazing too)

henlake7 · 01/04/2026 22:59

I figured it was just women are more likely to post things that annoy them or piss them off about their partners so men seem disproportionately shitty in comparison.
That simple!

Carla786 · 01/04/2026 23:03

FrootyCider · 01/04/2026 12:19

I agree. There's a lot of double standards, there's a lot of anger and negativity towards men in general. Of course, it's easy to get sucked in. VAWG is a serious problem. Misogyny is a serious problem. But I feel like the prevalent anti-men attitude misses the point. Misogyny and the macho culture in society harms men and boys in different, but very valid ways. We can't tackle it without them.

I teach and I can see so much misogyny and poor behaviour from boys that really stems from self esteem. They don't feel manly enough. They are expected to act a certain way, dress a certain way, believe certain things, or society will say they are not good enough. Men who are effeminate, physically weak, or don't conform are punished in a way that I don't think women are.

I think about recent threads which advocate for banning all men from childcare settings. Threads on which people lose their collective minds when boys want to wear a skirt/leggings/ballet pumps. Threads full of women saying they wouldn't date men who can't drive, or don't earn enough. Oh, and threads which state men and women can't be friends. (My best friend is a man and my husband had a 'best woman' at his wedding)

There's very little sympathy for men, and sometimes they really do deserve it.

I think about recent threads which advocate for banning all men from childcare settings

  • I think this is more because there's strong evidence male paedophiles are disproportionately targeting kids' nurseries. The point is they are NOT representative of men.

There are also plenty of threads that say platonic male friends are possible.

Carla786 · 01/04/2026 23:05

gannett · 01/04/2026 12:32

Oh don't get me started on all the threads where poster after poster lines up to declare that men who are short, or not high earners, or shy, or upset, or vulnerable, or bisexual, give her the ick. To me, learning about feminism and gender theory was what allowed me to unlearn all the traditional gender roles I'd been brought up with, both for men and women. It generally seems on MN that posters are happy with every traditional gender role except that men should do housework as well.

(Which is such a pointless thing to argue from a feminist standpoint. Yes, men should do equal amounts of chores and parenting. That's sorted out in my relationship. No one can step in and sort it out in yours though.)

Is Mumsnet really pro traditional gender roles? They're generally supportive of women working, for one. I agree can be too harsh on men

Carla786 · 01/04/2026 23:06

gannett · 01/04/2026 12:37

"Often" is doing all the heavy lifting there though.

Sex is sometimes a key element in the relationships between men and women. Equally, sex is sometimes absent from those relationships entirely.

Men often use friendship as a gateway to sex, and so do women. Men and women also use friendship as a gateway to nothing more than friendship, and those two sentences are not contradictory. (They also use friendship as a gateway to social status, career connections and many more ulterior motives. People are complex! Boiling it down to only sex is silly.)

Friendship between two people who are attracted to each other often leads to sex, but if one or both are in non-open relationships it often doesn't, unless one or both lacks moral fibre. I'm aware that affairs happen a great deal but "finding someone attractive and then doing nothing about it on account of already having a husband/wife" also happens a great deal, and is not as dramatic to talk about.

Good post!

TooBigForMyBoots · 01/04/2026 23:11

Grtscott · 01/04/2026 09:23

All very good points.

AIBU is a crazy place at times.

I find the sex board users the most realistic and down to earth about both sexes.

You know most anonymous "women" who post on sex forums and sex topics are men, right?🙈

Grtscott · 01/04/2026 23:12

TooBigForMyBoots · 01/04/2026 22:47

I'm am fully supportive of people calling out awful male behaviour and supporting women in recognising that for what it is and helping them address it in whichever way is appropriate.

Huh? You aren't at all supportive of the OP of that thread, where the man's behaviour is really, really unpleasant.

Edited

As I said, I believe there's more going on there than the OP has shared.

OP already has stated she's told STBX he can't date - completely unreasonable and controlling.

STBX has told OP she isn't meeting his sexual needs and wants to open the marriage. This needs exploring further.

So I didn't post on the thread - I can't go along with the man is in the wrong as there's information missing. The OP has gone AWOL, so there's no way of knowing what is actually going on. I refuse to immediately believe the woman is in the right because she's already shown herself to be unreasonable over the dating comment.

OP posts:
Grtscott · 01/04/2026 23:14

TooBigForMyBoots · 01/04/2026 23:11

You know most anonymous "women" who post on sex forums and sex topics are men, right?🙈

And you're so sure of this because...?

... You're so down on men, many of them pretend to be women online for kicks?

That's quite a leap.

OP posts:
Grtscott · 01/04/2026 23:17

Carla786 · 01/04/2026 22:49

Yes I think OP is naive about Reddit. It is huge in the US in a way that really isn't comparable to mumsnet, and globally influential.

I'm not sure why Reddit is relevant to how posters use MN to put men down.

It's been a irrelevant segway.

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread