We earn that as a joint income (salary probably split 20/80, but overall it puts us above the threshold) and have supported/supporting two through uni. Both doing 4 year degrees (one with an industrial placement year, and one doing an integrated masters)
Yes it's bloody hard having to top up, we've had to stop saving for a few years. We have tightened belts. Even with a good income we don't own our own home and rent increases have been added during this time too. However, our "high" income means they are reliant on us helping. That's just a fair thing to do. It's not their fault our joint income is deemed high by SF.
The alternative is my husband finding a job that pay less so our kids can claim more loans. That's a ridiculous alternative.
My oldest is graduating this summer. After living back home last year while completing a placement year it allowed them to save and fund final year. They have now secured a graduate role in degree field for September. They will be earning more than I do.
If we hadn't of supported during the degree they wouldn't be in the position of having this job offer as they wouldn't have been able to afford uni on minimum loans.
That's the ceiling people speak of. I am at my ceiling by not having a degree, they are starting above my ceiling because of their degree.
Going back to the OP. I struggle to understand why a parent that has experienced uni, and all the benefits that has given, would not want the same for their child. It smacks of pulling up the ladder after you've used it.
Ultimately, I believe my role as a parent is to push my child out into the world with help so they can surpass me. I feel that has been achieved with oldest and hopefully will be similar with youngest.