Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

This country is doomed

964 replies

HappyFace2025 · 27/02/2026 08:29

While the vote in Gorton and Denton may be described as a 'protest' vote the strength of both the Greens and Reform performance is something to worry all of us not just Labour.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
17
scottishgirl69 · 28/02/2026 15:44

BIossomtoes · 28/02/2026 15:31

You and me both @scottishgirl69. I’m abandoning this thread, fancy a cuppa?

Aye me too. I'll on the vodka by 6pm if I stay on here :)

Leftieinthewild · 28/02/2026 15:45

Any religious extreme tends to be misogynistic. Look no further than America where pregnant women are dying due to a lack of medical treatment, or being kept on life support while technically dead so that they can grow a baby.

Look at reforms admiration of the regime that allows this to happen.

Claiming misogynists are only of a certain race or religion is to ignore most of the evidence around you.

1dayatatime · 28/02/2026 15:53

PrettyDamnCosmic · 28/02/2026 15:04

According to their report Democracy Volunteers informed elections staff at Manchester City Council about their findings only after the polls closed. They do not claim to have reported what they saw to polling station staff.

Democracy Volunteers don't report what actually happened. They just refer to "family voting" without describing exactly what this means. Is it just a family group all rocking up at the polling station together or is it multiple persons in the polling booths & apparent coercion or collusion?

https://democracyvolunteers.org/major-concerns-over-family-voting-in-gorton-and-denton-poll/

Here to help:

So firstly "family voting" is not a family turning up to a polling station to vote independently.

Instead under the Ballot Secrecy Act 2023 a new offence was inserted (so called family voting offence" into the Representation of the People Act 1983: ‘Influencing voters at polling booths’ (new section 62C). The offence is about (a) being with someone at a polling booth, or (b) being near a booth while another person is voting, with intent to influence how they vote or whether they vote. It is punishable (on summary conviction) by up to 6 months’ imprisonment and/or a fine.

So it's about being accompanied into a polling booth rather than being accompanied into a polling station.

Secondly the statement from Manchester City Council said: "It is extremely disappointing that Democracy Volunteers have waited until after polls have closed to make such claims."

In response Democracy Volunteers said “It is a normal international standard not to issue a comment until after a voting has finished, another accepted aspect of election observation is that you are encouraged to ask questions of staff.
This we did in a number of polling stations when the relevant presiding officer was available. Obviously they can be very busy so we don’t seek to interrupt their work. We posed questions about family voting in several polling stations."

Here is a further explanation on who Democracy Volunteers are and what family voting is:

https://fullfact.org/politics/democracy-volunteers-family-voting/

Who are Democracy Volunteers and what is ‘family voting’? – Full Fact

Claims made by election observers about the Gorton and Denton by-election have caused controversy online.

https://fullfact.org/politics/democracy-volunteers-family-voting/

HappyFace2025 · 28/02/2026 16:03

Thanks for your post @1dayatatime . Most informative.

OP posts:
PrettyDamnCosmic · 28/02/2026 16:04

1dayatatime · 28/02/2026 15:53

Here to help:

So firstly "family voting" is not a family turning up to a polling station to vote independently.

Instead under the Ballot Secrecy Act 2023 a new offence was inserted (so called family voting offence" into the Representation of the People Act 1983: ‘Influencing voters at polling booths’ (new section 62C). The offence is about (a) being with someone at a polling booth, or (b) being near a booth while another person is voting, with intent to influence how they vote or whether they vote. It is punishable (on summary conviction) by up to 6 months’ imprisonment and/or a fine.

So it's about being accompanied into a polling booth rather than being accompanied into a polling station.

Secondly the statement from Manchester City Council said: "It is extremely disappointing that Democracy Volunteers have waited until after polls have closed to make such claims."

In response Democracy Volunteers said “It is a normal international standard not to issue a comment until after a voting has finished, another accepted aspect of election observation is that you are encouraged to ask questions of staff.
This we did in a number of polling stations when the relevant presiding officer was available. Obviously they can be very busy so we don’t seek to interrupt their work. We posed questions about family voting in several polling stations."

Here is a further explanation on who Democracy Volunteers are and what family voting is:

https://fullfact.org/politics/democracy-volunteers-family-voting/

Thanks but the definition of the offence is

(a) being with someone at a polling booth,
or
(b) being near a booth while another person is voting,
with intent to influence how they vote or whether they vote

Democracy Volunteers may have seen someone near a booth while another person is voting but have no way of knowing whether that person was intending to influence how the other voted.

JustTryingToBeMe · 28/02/2026 16:37

If there are no repercussions then yes they are pointless. We need to stop pussyfooting around and uphold our laws as should the UN be able to uphold international law.

hulahoopingtoday · 28/02/2026 16:37

Pluto46 · 28/02/2026 14:16

That would probably depend on whether or not you took responsibility for yourself

this is what i'd refer to as a 'low information post'

1dayatatime · 28/02/2026 17:11

PrettyDamnCosmic · 28/02/2026 16:04

Thanks but the definition of the offence is

(a) being with someone at a polling booth,
or
(b) being near a booth while another person is voting,
with intent to influence how they vote or whether they vote

Democracy Volunteers may have seen someone near a booth while another person is voting but have no way of knowing whether that person was intending to influence how the other voted.

Edited

Agreed but being with someone actually in a polling booth regardless of whether you intend to influence them on their vote is an offence.

If you are near someone in a polling booth then it needs to be proven that you are trying to influence their vote.

peanutbuttertoasty · 28/02/2026 17:13

I saw it reported that the greens were also campaigning immediately outside polling stations on the day which is also illegal.

I thought they would win by a big margin anyway, but they should not get away with acting illegally if indeed they have

Alternativelyviewed · 28/02/2026 17:25

If this "family voting " is true, ie male family members telling the women how to vote doesn't anyone else think we have far deeper issues ?

I cannot fathom telling my two DC.how to vote or trying to!
One has just turned 18 and it's exciting to me that she has this right . I also wouldnt ask.her who she voted for and wouldn't care .

Pluto46 · 28/02/2026 17:26

hulahoopingtoday · 28/02/2026 16:37

this is what i'd refer to as a 'low information post'

In what way ?

Alternativelyviewed · 28/02/2026 17:27

@1dayatatime I read the excuse is language barriers hence why the men can be closer to coherce.

PrettyDamnCosmic · 28/02/2026 17:43

1dayatatime · 28/02/2026 17:11

Agreed but being with someone actually in a polling booth regardless of whether you intend to influence them on their vote is an offence.

If you are near someone in a polling booth then it needs to be proven that you are trying to influence their vote.

It's not clear what Democracy Volunteers are alleging occurred or whether they actually alerted polling station staff to potential offences. Their report makes no mention of alerting staff.

peanutbuttertoasty · 28/02/2026 17:50

Alternativelyviewed · 28/02/2026 17:27

@1dayatatime I read the excuse is language barriers hence why the men can be closer to coherce.

Don’t you have to have a level of English to get citizenship and therefore the right to vote?

DavidPeckham · 28/02/2026 18:00

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

BIossomtoes · 28/02/2026 18:03

This reply has been withdrawn

Message removed as it quotes a post that's been withdrawn

MolkosTeenageAngst · 28/02/2026 18:09

HappyFace2025 · 27/02/2026 08:47

But it can mean that a future GE makes a party like the Greens or Reform 'king makers' if they get enough MPs. It's not that long ago the the LibDems formed a coalition with Conservatives. If a party that fields their MPs as one whose main objective is Gaza gets the option to be part of Government then we need our heads examining.
FWIW I am politically homeless as are many other people. Who the fuck do we vote for?

The LibDem main objective when they got into the coalition was tuition fees, they knew this would get them lots of young voters but didn’t stand by anything they’d promised once in the coalition. Even if the Greens were to get into a coalition with one of the larger parties there is nothing to say the things they’re saying they’ll focus on to get votes will be the things they actually focus on if in government. How often do political parties actually follow the things they said in their manifesto once they get into power?

HappyFace2025 · 28/02/2026 18:11

MolkosTeenageAngst · 28/02/2026 18:09

The LibDem main objective when they got into the coalition was tuition fees, they knew this would get them lots of young voters but didn’t stand by anything they’d promised once in the coalition. Even if the Greens were to get into a coalition with one of the larger parties there is nothing to say the things they’re saying they’ll focus on to get votes will be the things they actually focus on if in government. How often do political parties actually follow the things they said in their manifesto once they get into power?

I agree that governments frequently renege on their pre election promises in their manifesto. Nevertheless I wouldn't like to see either the Greens or Reform getting enough MPs to form a coalition with either Labour or Conservatives.

OP posts:
peanutbuttertoasty · 28/02/2026 18:34

They’re crackers

BlueJuniper94 · 28/02/2026 19:36

Pleasealexa · 28/02/2026 10:29

@BlueJuniper94 I really wish I knew! Even if the UK had a strategy in the last decade (not sure they did) it would have been blown off course by COVID, China aggression and Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Trump was elected because the blue collar workers in the USA lost jobs, aka UK redwall (so charismatic right wing leader got in). Mamdani got voted in because living costs too high, therefore socialism/communism required = UK Greens vote.

The UK government needs super bright individuals who can stay the course and execute a strategy.Farage and Polanski definitely don't fit the brief!

Increasing the UK population through immigration however isn't the answer. We have to encourage growth in the new areas, such as AI. Why can't the UK produce Google type companies? It isn't for lack of talent but because there isn't the focus helping the start ups.

A UK CEO of a start up had to go to the US to grow. His company wants to come back but he is telling Kier that many of our universities are not generating the right skills in AI. Too few courses are focussed correctly - cut the useless courses (that exist for bums on seats) and give the funding to the right courses.

Construction is UK based therefore UK taxation, so focus on generating homegrown skills in that area..don't rely on immigration.

Defence is a sector that needs investment, it is UK focussed. No one likes conflict but we have to be realistic.

Encourage hospitality - enable youngsters to work from 16, part time, without the rigourous employment challenges on companies. This creates the culture of work. I'm shocked by how difficult it is to hire Saturday workers (so called in my day)

Which courses are useless - just out of interest?

1dayatatime · 28/02/2026 19:49

PrettyDamnCosmic · 28/02/2026 17:43

It's not clear what Democracy Volunteers are alleging occurred or whether they actually alerted polling station staff to potential offences. Their report makes no mention of alerting staff.

If you look at my post of 15:34, Democracy Volunteers confirmed that in some instances they made polling station staff aware of their concerns.

peanutbuttertoasty · 28/02/2026 19:53

peanutbuttertoasty · 28/02/2026 19:26

I’ll just leave this here for all you Greens fans who still think the party is still about environmental causes…

https://x.com/HeidiBachram/status/2027801087877812595?s=20

For the avoidance of doubt, the leaders of the greens are now protesting IN SUPPORT of a barbaric and radical Islamic regime that forcibly suppresses and kills women for not following strict Islamic rules, and massacres tens of thousands of its own young people for protesting.

Leftist defence incoming in 3…2…1….

1dayatatime · 28/02/2026 20:09

peanutbuttertoasty · 28/02/2026 19:53

For the avoidance of doubt, the leaders of the greens are now protesting IN SUPPORT of a barbaric and radical Islamic regime that forcibly suppresses and kills women for not following strict Islamic rules, and massacres tens of thousands of its own young people for protesting.

Leftist defence incoming in 3…2…1….

Left wing politics dating back to Marx is centred around strong v weak, rich v poor, bourgeois v proletariat. With support always going to weaker side regardless of the right and wrongs. Left wing politics is emotion based rather than logic based or heart over head.

So despite Hamas committing a horrific terrorist attack on Israel, Israel are the bad guys because they are stronger.

Russia and Ukraine is a bit easier and gets alignment from left and right. From the right Russia are the bad guys because they started it and from the left Russia are the bad guys because they are the stronger side.

In the case of the current conflict in Iran, the US are the bad guys because they are the stronger side. The fact that the Islamic regime in Tehran has been killing protesters for protesting is irrelevant to the left.

ZoeCM · 28/02/2026 20:41

PrettyDamnCosmic · 28/02/2026 15:04

According to their report Democracy Volunteers informed elections staff at Manchester City Council about their findings only after the polls closed. They do not claim to have reported what they saw to polling station staff.

Democracy Volunteers don't report what actually happened. They just refer to "family voting" without describing exactly what this means. Is it just a family group all rocking up at the polling station together or is it multiple persons in the polling booths & apparent coercion or collusion?

https://democracyvolunteers.org/major-concerns-over-family-voting-in-gorton-and-denton-poll/

But surely if the volunteers had just seen families turning up at the station to vote, they wouldn't even have mentioned it? It's not remotely unusual for family members over eighteen to go to the polling station together.