Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be surprised at someone being pregnant at 44

515 replies

Onempretime7788 · 08/02/2026 00:16

I would have thought post 35 was rare

OP posts:
SleepingStandingUp · 09/02/2026 14:16

Katiesaidthat · 09/02/2026 12:22

Women in the old days were having kids well into their 40s. I know a lady who fell pregnant at 48 as they weren´t taking precautions because they thought it was impossible. Now they know otherwise. If you haven´t been through the menopause...

And this is precisely why DH took his self off to the doctors....

SleepingStandingUp · 09/02/2026 14:17

wishingonastar101 · 09/02/2026 13:16

My friend just had her first baby at 46. She's knackered and confused as to why she made this decision... knowing her son will be an only child and have elderly parents young.

She's just had a baby. Knackered and confused is fairly typical regardless of age 😂

Lardychops · 09/02/2026 14:42

SleepingStandingUp · 09/02/2026 14:17

She's just had a baby. Knackered and confused is fairly typical regardless of age 😂

Those of us who have grandkids in our 40s know it’s a very different type of tiredness running around in your 40s than 20s xx

nam3c4ang3 · 09/02/2026 14:44

A friend was pregnant at 52 - second child. She had to medically pause menopause if I recall.

Neurodiversitydoctor · 09/02/2026 14:47

Cola32 · 09/02/2026 13:36

People miss that there is a clear difference between a 50yo dying if they have grown up children (20s to 30s) vs a 5yo. And chances of death tend to increase with age, you cannot bank on living til 90+ (and still being fit and healthy).

But you are absolutely right that in terms of elder care, it’s not fun or desirable at any age. Is a 40yo having to care for a 80yo really worse than a 50-60yo having to do it? I really don’t think so.

Unless the 40 yo has their own small children e.g. care sandwich. Whereas my DM was 26 when I was born, by the time DGF & DGM need care I was in my 20/30s so could help with the elder care. Now my children are young adults if my DPs need support ( so far so good they are 76 and 78) then I am freer to provide that than if I still had dependant children.

CrepituErgoSum · 09/02/2026 15:06

Hello to the other unicorns (seems there's a herd of us here galloping around Mumsnet). I had 2 in my Mumsnet-approved early 30s, then used pull out contraception for 13 years afterwards, which worked until suddenly it didn't.

My unicorn foal, born when I was 47, is currently 6 months and we've just read Peepo together. No covering up for a teenage pregnancy or IVF here, just a fun weekend away with the husband...

I find it bizarre how often this topic comes up. It's not really a "debate" because the stats are widely available. Someone else pointed out that every year in the UK there are about 2500 babies born to women over the age of 45.

I also found major studies done using family records of Quakers or Mormons from the 19th century which showed about 10% of the women who hadn't been widowed had their final baby after age 45, so hardly some kind of bizarre recent phenomenon. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4270889/. It was also correlated with longer lifespan in both the mother and her siblings.

Personally I would say that a 17/14 year age gap is fab in terms of getting some help, they fight over who gets to play with him after school.

Extended Maternal Age at Birth of Last Child and Women’s Longevity in the Long Life Family Study - PMC

This study investigated the association between maternal ages at birth of last child and the likelihood of survival to advanced ages. A nested case-control study using Long Life Family Study (LLFS) data. Three hundred and eleven women who survived ...

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4270889/

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 09/02/2026 15:44

CrepituErgoSum · 09/02/2026 15:06

Hello to the other unicorns (seems there's a herd of us here galloping around Mumsnet). I had 2 in my Mumsnet-approved early 30s, then used pull out contraception for 13 years afterwards, which worked until suddenly it didn't.

My unicorn foal, born when I was 47, is currently 6 months and we've just read Peepo together. No covering up for a teenage pregnancy or IVF here, just a fun weekend away with the husband...

I find it bizarre how often this topic comes up. It's not really a "debate" because the stats are widely available. Someone else pointed out that every year in the UK there are about 2500 babies born to women over the age of 45.

I also found major studies done using family records of Quakers or Mormons from the 19th century which showed about 10% of the women who hadn't been widowed had their final baby after age 45, so hardly some kind of bizarre recent phenomenon. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4270889/. It was also correlated with longer lifespan in both the mother and her siblings.

Personally I would say that a 17/14 year age gap is fab in terms of getting some help, they fight over who gets to play with him after school.

Ha we had an age gap like that. 12 years was the smallest. They were all just obsessed with her. Always someone to pay her attention!

I remember when she was sick all over her bed age 3. A 15 year old and a 19 year old changed her bed whilst l bathed her!

JHound · 09/02/2026 15:50

x2boys · 09/02/2026 13:20

Life's not that simple i would have loved to have found a decent partner in my 20,s but instead i met a succession of men who didnt want to commit
I didnt meet my dh until I was 31
Some people dont meet anyone till later or some not at all.

Yep!!

I would not have been ready for kids at 23 (I graduated the year I turned 23) but would happily married. However I never met my person 20 years later so that was that.

JHound · 09/02/2026 15:53

Cola32 · 09/02/2026 13:36

People miss that there is a clear difference between a 50yo dying if they have grown up children (20s to 30s) vs a 5yo. And chances of death tend to increase with age, you cannot bank on living til 90+ (and still being fit and healthy).

But you are absolutely right that in terms of elder care, it’s not fun or desirable at any age. Is a 40yo having to care for a 80yo really worse than a 50-60yo having to do it? I really don’t think so.

It’s even harder I would think. My parents were teens so by the time they need support so will I 😆

SleepingStandingUp · 09/02/2026 16:00

Neurodiversitydoctor · 09/02/2026 14:47

Unless the 40 yo has their own small children e.g. care sandwich. Whereas my DM was 26 when I was born, by the time DGF & DGM need care I was in my 20/30s so could help with the elder care. Now my children are young adults if my DPs need support ( so far so good they are 76 and 78) then I am freer to provide that than if I still had dependant children.

But if your young adults have kids, and they all need support, you're split between helping with the grandkids, helping the parents and working possibly full time! Or they could be grand unt they in their 90s and you could and you could be incapable of supporting them because you're struggling in your late 60s.

Neurodiversitydoctor · 09/02/2026 16:03

SleepingStandingUp · 09/02/2026 16:00

But if your young adults have kids, and they all need support, you're split between helping with the grandkids, helping the parents and working possibly full time! Or they could be grand unt they in their 90s and you could and you could be incapable of supporting them because you're struggling in your late 60s.

All this is true but in my model there is another layer of potentially able- bodied adults in the mix, which on balance probably does make things a bit easier.

AutumnAllTheWay · 09/02/2026 16:59

Lardychops · 09/02/2026 14:42

Those of us who have grandkids in our 40s know it’s a very different type of tiredness running around in your 40s than 20s xx

Especially if youve let yourself get lardy, lardy chops.

Sorry, couldn't resist 😉

Point is, we're all different, and some are fitter than others in their 40s.

Carla786 · 09/02/2026 23:43

EmeraldShamrock000 · 08/02/2026 13:08

44 is not unusual. It’s not ideal.
30 is ideal.
20 to 24 is peak time.
38 onwards is dicing with fertility.
Menopause with a teenager is bad, menopause with a toddler is really bad.

In middle class circles it isn’t acceptable before 35 onwards.

I am 45, I’m the youngest mother in DD group of friends, she is 17, I was 28 giving birth, her friends parents well in the 50’s, most are divorced. I’ll be 52 when DS is 17, dreading it, couldn’t imagine been 52 with a 7 year old. I should have had mine earlier in hindsight.

Tbh a lot of her friends have problems with their parents as the parents just want peace and quiet, between menopause and their full life before children, they’re burnt out, very little input or patience. Generation disaster

'In middle class circles it isn’t acceptable before 35 onwards.'

  • that's not true, come on...
TheIceBear · 10/02/2026 13:39

Lardychops · 08/02/2026 23:48

Point is I found a decent spouse at 23 got my arse in gear by committing and going on a journey to build a life together - we built our lives together while our counter parts were playing the field and travelling, dating and chipping and changing ( god knows what that most be like now in the ‘swipe left /right- always something better out there’culture etc.
We lived skint in the bedsit, had the first baby, did uni and post grad while the other worked, built the careers in turn, climbed the ladder while having more kids, bought the grotty one bed flat with two kids then built up from there

All I’m saying is if you want a family don’t delay ‘while doing you’
‘Do you ‘ while having a family young -it’s brilliant x

My 20s were the best years of my life , travelling , partying without a care in the world . I know for me personally if I was travelling in my 40s , it would never be quite as good as backpacking in my 20s, with little responsibilities. I loved it and do not regret not having a family in my 20s . Playing the field and travelling sounds good to me! Do I think my choices were better than yours ? Absolutely not and I certainly wouldn’t be preaching to anyone else about what they should do. I can imagine there are massive benefits to having children young and them being independent by the time you are in your 40s, freeing you up to do different things . It’s just a different choice both have benefits.

YankSplaining · 10/02/2026 14:03

It’s not unreasonable to be a little surprised that someone is pregnant at 44, but it’s completely bizarre to think that pregnancy is rare after 35.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page