Sure, but again you are not seeing all the people who tried and didn’t manage to have babies at 40 and beyond. Because babies that don’t exist aren’t visible and can’t be counted and noticed and thought of as ‘the norm’ or otherwise. We notice what we see; we notice the success stories.
When I was trying to have a baby I blithely assumed that being fit and healthy in my mid 30s and having and no PCOS and no endometriosis and no immune issues and a super fecund family with dozens of cousins meant I’d have no trouble conceiving.
I’d also accidentally fallen pregnant in my 20s while on the pill, so it wasn’t an issue with fertility from the getgo.
Starting at 33 it took me 2 years to get a positive pregnancy test (which ended in stillbirth) and multiple miscarriages after that. I finally had a child at 40, conceived without assistance, but prior to that I’d had 2 failed rounds of IVF where my eggs were discovered to be such poor quality that only one out of 10 fertilised, producing a sad little slow-growing misshapen blastocyst that never implanted.
We had extensive genetic testing, testing of sperm and reproductive tract issues and uterine lining and everything - and the only problem was egg quality. And that is the part of the process that is most affected by age.
I was unlucky my eggs had quite such a short expiry date, and not everyone’s do - but there is this weird attitude on MN that age shouldn’t affect women’s bodies because feminism.
And if you suggest fertility declines as you get older you’re some weird tradwife having a pop at older mothers.
And I am an older mother, so I’m certainly not judging! But it took me the better part of a decade of relentless intrusive investigations to get there - so it feels a bit shitty when people dismiss the infertility struggles of older women as scaremongering and essentially say, don’t be daft, everyone has babies in their 40s, it’s easy, this isn’t the dark ages!