You seem highly invested with talk of winning and losing arguments.
Well no. I said ‘you’ve lost your argument’ once. That’s a sentence. Not ‘highly invested’.
You haven’t given ‘several examples’. You’ve given two, once of which was a consequence of playing a Yoto too loudly, so that’s not relevant.
Cancelling plans is practical when it’s practical
Exactly – and this is why it’s ineffective. Because it’s inconsistent and only applicable on occasion.
Cancelling occasional playdates is still an adult-managed consequence. The child doesn’t experience a direct, logical result of waking you up, they experience that you decided something was cancelled because YOU are tired. You can explain it as cause-and-effect all you like, but it remains indirect and authority-driven. That’s the distinction you’re refusing to acknowledge –not a lack of ‘solutions’ on anyone else’s part. If you’d read my other comments you’d see I have responded to other solutions-based ideas.
He also knows if mummy or daddy need a nap in the middle of the day then we leave them to nap as a matter of kindness. What he receives in return only cements that we all look after each other.
A 4yr old not waking parents up isn’t acting out of ‘kindness’. That’s an adult interpretation layered onto a child’s behaviour. At that age, children are responding to patterns, expectations, and outcomes that directly affect them OR become they don’t care about it – not moral consideration for a parent’s need for rest. Calling that kindness is, frankly, projecting adult motives onto a child.