and you don't think that "main concern" is enough on its own to explain why lots of women are so anti-men?
pp's referenced the 'men are scared women will laugh at them, women are scared men will murder them' saying above. If you took the "worst" 10% of women and the "worst" 10% of men, surely it's bad enough that on average the women might be bitchy, lazy, argumentative or whatever, whereas on average the men are hugely more likely to be rapists or murderers?
I agree that men aren't solely capable, in that boys aren't automatically born "worse" than girls. It's as much about the way many of them are taught/enabled growing up, which we as women (a collective sex class) also have some culpability for accepting/encouraging male laziness, entitlement etc. Whether it's extreme (MIL not letting her darling boy do a thing) or more minor (women on here insisting their DH is "brilliant" and "a completely equal partner") if they split chores and parenting 45/55 because she knows most of her friends do 5/95%.
Another element of culpability is that, on average men probably don't places as much importance on the extraneous/decorative/social "stuff" as women do, and if we are entirely honest with ourselves some of that stuff isn't essential. A world full of men without women enabling them probably wouldn't have constantly clean school uniform, nicely wrapped presents, thank you cards, multiple after school clubs, fresh flowers in the house, diffusers making the home smell nice, or Christmas decorations, but would still function. We (again mass generalisation) tend to like and appreciate the 'extra' stuff, for ourselves or for our kids, and of course often it is beneficial and worth it, but sometimes it isn't - and whether appreciated or not it is work and effort that isn't entirely necessary.