Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Would you/have you secretly filmed at your child's Nativity?

1000 replies

Dramatic · 19/12/2025 11:05

So our school has a policy that you aren't allowed to film/take photos at all, total blanket ban. They don't take photos or film themselves either.

My husband works away and never gets to see the plays so I secretly film them/take photos (just my child's part but there are others in the background) and I show the videos to him.

I don't put them on any social media or send them to anyone else, even Grandparents etc.

Aibu?

OP posts:
Baby2duejuly2026 · 19/12/2025 18:20

Dramatic · 19/12/2025 18:18

Yes I understand that, but what I'm saying is in my exact case there is no risk. I'm not saying that the school has to think of it that way or that everyone who films won't put it on SM. What I'm saying is that the actual video I took poses no risk to anyone.

Look, YABU. Everyone but a few people think you’re being unreasonable. Give it up OP. You asked the question - we answered.

Taztoy · 19/12/2025 18:20

UsernameAlreadyTaken101 · 19/12/2025 18:18

We've had that situation happen. Mum was caught. Headteacher went over to speak to her which caused lots of people to look over to see what was going on. Mum's child on stage started crying and had to be taken off. So she ruined it for herself and her son!

Good for the headteacher.

sorry about the child being upset but no sympathy for the parent.

SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 19/12/2025 18:20

@Dramatic - what would you do if the parent of one of the children in the background of your video asked you to delete the pictures of their child? Would you do as they asked, or would you argue with them the way you have argued on here, and potentially cause a scene at/after the Nativity?

fandangooo · 19/12/2025 18:22

Cuppatea1982 · 19/12/2025 17:53

It's absolutely not a stretch the police are inundated with this at the moment. It's absolutely fucking depressing. When my ex was investigated it took over a year for his device to even be searched because the backlog of cases involving devices to be checked is so large they can't keep up. Its extremely concerning. I work in safeguarding and in the last month I've supported 5 families affected by this. If you think it's a stretch then you really need to better inform yourself.

You're completely right that's a risk people take when they share images of their kids online. Which is why so many parents, myself included, choose not to. You also need to be actively on top of what apps are on your phone and how they utilise your camera roll. Parents have got to be able to make informed choices around this in order to safeguard their children as different children will be at different levels of risk. Op is essentially taking away the ability to make any choice from them by taking it into her own hands. The very fact the school has said no recordings/ photos means there was most likely someone on stage/ in the audience who's at risk. We have no way to know who is/ is not harmful or uninformed around online safety which is why parents need to be able to work together and adhere to these rules.

You are talking about online safety but op has repeatedly said she won’t be sharing it online. I’ve read what you say and I don’t disagree with you but please can you explain where the risk is in what OP has done? Taking it purely on face value of her showing (not sending) her own husband the video, where is the risk?

WhereTheFuckIsMyFuckingCoat · 19/12/2025 18:22

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · 19/12/2025 18:10

The forms are meaningless. You cannot control others’ rights to take pictures. The most it could do is let the school know that you are unhappy about photos.

If a court makes an order against photos that’s a judicial decision. It’s nothing to do with consent.

Bullshit!

Would you/have you secretly filmed at your child's Nativity?
Would you/have you secretly filmed at your child's Nativity?
Would you/have you secretly filmed at your child's Nativity?
Taztoy · 19/12/2025 18:22

fandangooo · 19/12/2025 18:22

You are talking about online safety but op has repeatedly said she won’t be sharing it online. I’ve read what you say and I don’t disagree with you but please can you explain where the risk is in what OP has done? Taking it purely on face value of her showing (not sending) her own husband the video, where is the risk?

The risk is that no one knows if she’s telling the truth.

Dramatic · 19/12/2025 18:23

Taztoy · 19/12/2025 18:20

How do I know that?

Because I'm telling you that I haven't sent it to anyone and it won't be shared anywhere. You can choose not to believe me but then you could just choose not to believe the whole thread if that's the case 🤷

OP posts:
AFavourPlease · 19/12/2025 18:23

Absolutely @UsernameAlreadyTaken101which is why we played by the rules, I was just trying to say that I do understand why something as small as a photo can have greater significance to people. And in our instance it was just hard because DC2 will always be in the only class with zero photos, just Sod’s Law that photos seem to be his area of focus - he needs one of everything (and I mean everything - try a trip to the zoo without getting each individual insect in the reptile house 🫠). We did ask the school but it was a no as they felt they’d have to offer all parents in the class the chance for a photo. We also don’t get photo updates from school trips. Which is ok for now but when they’re old enough for a residential I don’t know what the answer will be as parents obviously expect a few photos during the week 🤷‍♀️

Cuppatea1982 · 19/12/2025 18:24

Dramatic · 19/12/2025 18:06

No it's not on the cloud, no I don't have apps that have access to my photos and no I didn't send it to him.

Do you have Instagram Facebook Tiktok or Snapchat?

Taztoy · 19/12/2025 18:24

Dramatic · 19/12/2025 18:23

Because I'm telling you that I haven't sent it to anyone and it won't be shared anywhere. You can choose not to believe me but then you could just choose not to believe the whole thread if that's the case 🤷

Look. You might be telling the truth. But Susan sitting beside you might not be. No one can see inside your head so the school, TO KEEP CHILDREN SAFE, make a blanket rule.

like it or lump it. If you don’t like it, withdraw your child and then there won’t be a performance for your husband to miss out on.

Cuppatea1982 · 19/12/2025 18:26

Dramatic · 19/12/2025 18:23

Because I'm telling you that I haven't sent it to anyone and it won't be shared anywhere. You can choose not to believe me but then you could just choose not to believe the whole thread if that's the case 🤷

Op if a man you didn't know took a video of your child and told you, don't worry I'm only going to show my wife. Would you be cool with that? How would you know that was the truth? How would you know it wouldn't end up on social media?

Ubertomusic · 19/12/2025 18:26

Cuppatea1982 · 19/12/2025 17:53

It's absolutely not a stretch the police are inundated with this at the moment. It's absolutely fucking depressing. When my ex was investigated it took over a year for his device to even be searched because the backlog of cases involving devices to be checked is so large they can't keep up. Its extremely concerning. I work in safeguarding and in the last month I've supported 5 families affected by this. If you think it's a stretch then you really need to better inform yourself.

You're completely right that's a risk people take when they share images of their kids online. Which is why so many parents, myself included, choose not to. You also need to be actively on top of what apps are on your phone and how they utilise your camera roll. Parents have got to be able to make informed choices around this in order to safeguard their children as different children will be at different levels of risk. Op is essentially taking away the ability to make any choice from them by taking it into her own hands. The very fact the school has said no recordings/ photos means there was most likely someone on stage/ in the audience who's at risk. We have no way to know who is/ is not harmful or uninformed around online safety which is why parents need to be able to work together and adhere to these rules.

Photos can be taken at school gates or on the streets or in public transport, you wouldn't even notice.

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · 19/12/2025 18:26

WhereTheFuckIsMyFuckingCoat · 19/12/2025 18:22

Bullshit!

Edited

Thanks for that AI slop. You do not know what you’re talking about. Sorry.

UsernameAlreadyTaken101 · 19/12/2025 18:29

AFavourPlease · 19/12/2025 18:23

Absolutely @UsernameAlreadyTaken101which is why we played by the rules, I was just trying to say that I do understand why something as small as a photo can have greater significance to people. And in our instance it was just hard because DC2 will always be in the only class with zero photos, just Sod’s Law that photos seem to be his area of focus - he needs one of everything (and I mean everything - try a trip to the zoo without getting each individual insect in the reptile house 🫠). We did ask the school but it was a no as they felt they’d have to offer all parents in the class the chance for a photo. We also don’t get photo updates from school trips. Which is ok for now but when they’re old enough for a residential I don’t know what the answer will be as parents obviously expect a few photos during the week 🤷‍♀️

Don't mean to derail the thread but that's a real shame. I'm not one to be that parent but in this case I'd probably argue the point that all other classes have photos of their children and SOME pictures of your child would be really helpful for him. I have several children in my class who aren't allowed to be photographed but I'm always able to provide individual or group shots of special activities without showing them. There are plenty of ways around it and it seems weird to single out one particular class. It actually could make the vulnerable children feel responsible which is not good.

Cuppatea1982 · 19/12/2025 18:31

fandangooo · 19/12/2025 18:22

You are talking about online safety but op has repeatedly said she won’t be sharing it online. I’ve read what you say and I don’t disagree with you but please can you explain where the risk is in what OP has done? Taking it purely on face value of her showing (not sending) her own husband the video, where is the risk?

The risk is that op through her actions, creates a precedence that makes the safeguarding rule utterly defunct by creating a culture of - its fine to ignore this rule and be sneaky about it. It's fine to ignore this rule because I'm 'only' showing my husband. It makes it impossible for the school to police properly. So the consequence is that either op is banned from her kids performances going forward and they don't get to have either parent there, or some poor child who's had a rough enough time has to be excluded from opportunities that should be open to them to protect them from parents like op who can't follow a simple rule.

It's the same rule of thumb as why we need female only spaces or why women would be more likely to choose the bear. Because you can't tell what's harmful or not. The school or anyone else can't go - oh its OK because its op so we know she's cool. Because that's unfair to all the other working parents. So where does that end?

adviceneeded1990 · 19/12/2025 18:33

Dramatic · 19/12/2025 18:23

Because I'm telling you that I haven't sent it to anyone and it won't be shared anywhere. You can choose not to believe me but then you could just choose not to believe the whole thread if that's the case 🤷

So if another parent saw you and asked you to delete it because it’s a potential safeguarding risk to their child, would you? Or would you double down like you have on this thread and leave them worried that you might be exposing their child to danger?

musicinme · 19/12/2025 18:36

Dramatic · 19/12/2025 18:18

Yes I understand that, but what I'm saying is in my exact case there is no risk. I'm not saying that the school has to think of it that way or that everyone who films won't put it on SM. What I'm saying is that the actual video I took poses no risk to anyone.

I understand you are sincere, but Children's Services, the school and the police could not take that risk. My foster child had to leave the school.

Nanny0gg · 19/12/2025 18:36

Dramatic · 19/12/2025 17:57

Because I haven't sent the video to a single person.

But if others copy you...you're doing it so it's ok?

I don't know why I'm engaging. You are the epitome of the entitled people who don't give a damn about anyone else as long as they record the 'memories'

And you'll do exactly what you feel like doing.

Cuppatea1982 · 19/12/2025 18:36

Ubertomusic · 19/12/2025 18:26

Photos can be taken at school gates or on the streets or in public transport, you wouldn't even notice.

I know we are always going to live with an element of risk. And there's a lot of that I can't control, but there are certain things I can control like not bringing my child to the area where I know their dad lives or works etc. But I absolutely expect safeguarding processes to be followed in a contained space where its possible to do.

But that's like saying there's no point in getting an mot or servicing your car because sure you could have an accident anyway. We live with risk but we also all take steps to mitigate risk where we can every single day. And this IS a situation where risk could be mitigated and actually removed almost completely if people like op weren't so entitled.

Dramatic · 19/12/2025 18:38

Nanny0gg · 19/12/2025 18:36

But if others copy you...you're doing it so it's ok?

I don't know why I'm engaging. You are the epitome of the entitled people who don't give a damn about anyone else as long as they record the 'memories'

And you'll do exactly what you feel like doing.

No I won't, I'd love to post it on SM but I won't.

OP posts:
Taztoy · 19/12/2025 18:39

Dramatic · 19/12/2025 18:38

No I won't, I'd love to post it on SM but I won't.

so you haven’t sent it to your husband?

in that case, it’s still on your phone and is a risk every day till you delete it.

but somehow I don’t think you’ll be planning to do that.

ChristmasBlanket · 19/12/2025 18:40

Dramatic · 19/12/2025 11:14

What are the chances of someone hacking/stealing my phone and then releasing that one specific video to the person who is a threat to another child?

What do the odds matter? Surely you understand why this policy is in place and what the potential repercussions are for other children and their families?

Dramatic · 19/12/2025 18:40

Taztoy · 19/12/2025 18:39

so you haven’t sent it to your husband?

in that case, it’s still on your phone and is a risk every day till you delete it.

but somehow I don’t think you’ll be planning to do that.

No, I've repeatedly said I haven't sent it to him

OP posts:
Nanny0gg · 19/12/2025 18:41

ChristmasBlanket · 19/12/2025 18:40

What do the odds matter? Surely you understand why this policy is in place and what the potential repercussions are for other children and their families?

See that wall over there?

We might as well talk to that.

Taztoy · 19/12/2025 18:41

Dramatic · 19/12/2025 18:40

No, I've repeatedly said I haven't sent it to him

So when will you be deleting it? And don’t forget to delete it from the recently deleted.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.