Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Liverpool attacker sentenced

343 replies

ireallycantbelievethis · 16/12/2025 18:48

Paul Doyle, the Liverpool parade attacker, has been sentenced to twenty one years and six months in prison for his attack that injured 134 people.

That’s 258 months, or less than two months per person injured. He’ll be out in half, so 129 months served. Less than one month per person. Reading the victim impact statements was awful. One from a little boy, who is completely traumatised, stuck with me.

AIBU to think this is a farce?!

OP posts:
lightlily · 16/12/2025 22:57

I thought the sentence was reasonable. No time will be enough for the family.

I have a close family member who was involved in a similar thing (group of people driven into where no one died but serious injuries/long lasting psychological trauma) and the driver got 5 years. No sentence would have been enough but I recognise that there are sentencing guidelines in place and we need a structure around proportionate sentencing.

Your anger/distain towards the wife and kids is misplaced but is relatable for me. I couldn’t stand hearing about how devastated the driver’s family were. They were negatively impacted of course, and must have been sad, but they weren’t the true victims of it.

Ebok1990 · 16/12/2025 22:59

BeardofHagrid · 16/12/2025 22:45

The crowd was full of violent people who smashed his back windows and were kicking lumps out of his car. No wonder he snapped.

I know of a woman who drowned her child in the bath, she got four years. Huw Edwards got nothing for his horrific crimes! The judges just make up whatever they feel like.

I barely know where to start but just to be absolutely clear, judges do not just make up whatever they feel like.

Roobarbtwo · 16/12/2025 22:59

CheesecakeOnTheLanai · 16/12/2025 22:57

You are a complete and utter disgrace. He was driving erratically and dangerously long before he reached the city centre. People only began banging on his car when they realised he had no intention of stopping - at one point he slammed into reverse and crashed into an ambulance.
I am astonished that anyone could defend this behaviour, he is a violent thug who is very lucky he didn't kill someone.

The Bbc footage is completely horrific. At one point he slows down then carries on and drives into the crowd. My god. Can you imagine how terrifying it was for people caught up in it

Roobarbtwo · 16/12/2025 23:01

lightlily · 16/12/2025 22:57

I thought the sentence was reasonable. No time will be enough for the family.

I have a close family member who was involved in a similar thing (group of people driven into where no one died but serious injuries/long lasting psychological trauma) and the driver got 5 years. No sentence would have been enough but I recognise that there are sentencing guidelines in place and we need a structure around proportionate sentencing.

Your anger/distain towards the wife and kids is misplaced but is relatable for me. I couldn’t stand hearing about how devastated the driver’s family were. They were negatively impacted of course, and must have been sad, but they weren’t the true victims of it.

No they weren't but there have been posts on here suggesting the wife is responsible

Roobarbtwo · 16/12/2025 23:01

Ebok1990 · 16/12/2025 22:59

I barely know where to start but just to be absolutely clear, judges do not just make up whatever they feel like.

They absolutely don't

FiredFromACannon · 16/12/2025 23:02

It sounds like he was in an uncontrollable rage, and he had form for having a short temper and violent outbursts. Perhaps he’d been able to keep it under control fo a long time but if that’s the way you’re wired you probably can’t keep it under control forever. I think the sentence is about right.

As an aside I once got stuck in my car on a road outside a football stadium just as the fans started coming out, the road was suddenly filled with people banging on the car and shouting, it was terrifying, I shut the engine off and waited for them to all pass. It sounds like he was already in a rage an couldn’t control himself.

sittingonabeach · 16/12/2025 23:05

It is a wonder people weren't killed

wineosaurusrex · 16/12/2025 23:05

It's gross that you're saying this man is basically a violent psychopath and that his family MUST have known, and then also blaming them for his crime. How could they psychically have known he was going to commit this crime and go to the police in advance?! You're being absolutely ridiculous and melodramatic. If he is as evil as you keep insisting then his family were probably terrified of him and his biggest victims!

You're being weirdly aggressive to posters on this thread.

I think the sentence is is adequate.

AmberSpy · 16/12/2025 23:07

BeardofHagrid · 16/12/2025 22:45

The crowd was full of violent people who smashed his back windows and were kicking lumps out of his car. No wonder he snapped.

I know of a woman who drowned her child in the bath, she got four years. Huw Edwards got nothing for his horrific crimes! The judges just make up whatever they feel like.

The judges are obliged to follow the Sentencing Guidelines, which are freely accessible online, if you can be bothered to search for them

CheesecakeOnTheLanai · 16/12/2025 23:08

Roobarbtwo · 16/12/2025 22:59

The Bbc footage is completely horrific. At one point he slows down then carries on and drives into the crowd. My god. Can you imagine how terrifying it was for people caught up in it

Absolutely, my lovely neighbour is a student and was working in a bar on the same road, the first she knew of it was the screaming coming from outside.
She ran out and was convinced she was witnessing a terrorist attack, she said there were people scattered all over the floor. The poor buggers who were actually involved will probably be traumatised for years to come. The fact that this seems to just have been all down to uncontrolled rage is just mindboggling.

sleepwouldbenice · 16/12/2025 23:13

Dramatic · 16/12/2025 22:53

Have you bothered to watch the footage? He was running red lights and driving very erratically before he was anywhere near the crowd.

At first when I read about the altercation on Dale Street I did wonder if crowd issues had wound him up or scared ( not that would be an excuse but might be a context). However the court evidence is clear, he was the sole agressor on Dale Street, then chose not to follow the two routes for cars, and deliberately went down water Street, a pedestrian route. Crucially he seems solely responsible

GoodQueenWenceslaus · 16/12/2025 23:13

ireallycantbelievethis · 16/12/2025 19:17

I’ve read enough to know this vile, evil man attacked one of the largest cities in the UK and a lot of people seem to think it was perfectly okay

Name one person who thinks what he did was perfectly okay.

wineosaurusrex · 16/12/2025 23:15

Even if his wife had noticed his rage issues, what was she meant to do? Go to the police (who barely bother to turn up to reports of actual crimes these days), and insist that they should intervene because her husband hadn't done anything but might at some point?!

Or get him mental health support to learn to manage his rage issues? Obviously the UK is a country with a crumbling health system and almost zero adequate mental health support available for the majority of the population. Perhaps if he had been able to access MH support he could have been able to learn to deal with rage episodes. So many crimes recently committed by people who are in absolutely desperate need to the MH support and intervention that is basically impossible to access in the UK.

There is NO justification whatsoever for you to blame his wife or family. Women are never responsible for the violence of men. HTH.

EchoesOfOurDreams · 16/12/2025 23:17

BeardofHagrid · 16/12/2025 22:45

The crowd was full of violent people who smashed his back windows and were kicking lumps out of his car. No wonder he snapped.

I know of a woman who drowned her child in the bath, she got four years. Huw Edwards got nothing for his horrific crimes! The judges just make up whatever they feel like.

That has been completely disproven in court from his own dashcam footage.

The crowd were smashing his windows etc AFTER he'd already driven into people in an attempt to stop him. Which again was proven in court.

KimuraTan · 16/12/2025 23:17

ireallycantbelievethis · 16/12/2025 19:02

I care very little about his family, who will have looked past his clear anger issues for years. I care a lot more about the innocent men, women and children who were at the parade and who have been traumatised for life. Why aren’t you more angry about yet another act of male violence being excused and played down?

Can you also channel that anger toward the puny sentences for rapists please - while you’re at it. The victims relive their ordeal for the rest of their lives. Someone invading their body and trying to degrade them. Please save some of your anger for these type of offenders who sometimes get a bare slap on the wrist - if that.

MasterBeth · 16/12/2025 23:18

sleepwouldbenice · 16/12/2025 23:13

At first when I read about the altercation on Dale Street I did wonder if crowd issues had wound him up or scared ( not that would be an excuse but might be a context). However the court evidence is clear, he was the sole agressor on Dale Street, then chose not to follow the two routes for cars, and deliberately went down water Street, a pedestrian route. Crucially he seems solely responsible

No shit, Sherlock.

sittingonabeach · 16/12/2025 23:20

@BeardofHagrid luckily one member of the crowd managed to access the inside of the car to stop it. He risked getting run over to do that

GoodQueenWenceslaus · 16/12/2025 23:20

Why assume he will automatically come out after two thirds of his sentence? He will have to satisfy a parole board that he is not dangerous, which means showing that he has his temper100% under control. Unless he undergoes very effective therapy he may find that very difficult in prison conditions.

sleepwouldbenice · 16/12/2025 23:25

MasterBeth · 16/12/2025 23:18

No shit, Sherlock.

I was referring to those who had heard about the incidents on Dale Street and might have thought the crowds were partly to blame
But you carry on being and arrogant idiot.

Flowerslamp · 16/12/2025 23:52

Ok, so OP had an agenda from the start. The whole north south, rich poor thing and to blame his wife.

ConstitutionHill · 16/12/2025 23:59

@Roobarbtwo"blaming"? I'm in no way blaming his wife or family. Where did I say that? I'm saying I bet he took his rage out on them too.

Awwlookatmybabyspider · 16/12/2025 23:59

Bagsintheboot · 16/12/2025 19:01

21 years is a pretty long sentence considering he didn't actually kill anyone.

Seriously, think how long ago 21 years was for you. Think how old you'll be in 21 years.

Its a not insubstantial sentence.

Well that’s thanks to Grace of God that he didn’t kill anyone. It’s certainly no thanks to Paul Doyle that there were no fatalities.

TidyCrow · 17/12/2025 00:01

BeardofHagrid · 16/12/2025 22:45

The crowd was full of violent people who smashed his back windows and were kicking lumps out of his car. No wonder he snapped.

I know of a woman who drowned her child in the bath, she got four years. Huw Edwards got nothing for his horrific crimes! The judges just make up whatever they feel like.

Why tell lies to defend violent men?

nocoolnamesleft · 17/12/2025 00:01

BeardofHagrid · 16/12/2025 22:45

The crowd was full of violent people who smashed his back windows and were kicking lumps out of his car. No wonder he snapped.

I know of a woman who drowned her child in the bath, she got four years. Huw Edwards got nothing for his horrific crimes! The judges just make up whatever they feel like.

I initially thought that. Then I found out that footage was after other footage where he had already mowed through part the crowd. They were trying to stop a man who was using his car as a lethal weapon. At that point the fans' violence was fully justified and proportionate.

Yellowcakestand · 17/12/2025 00:54

A third off if good behaviour inside. Plus time already served on remand is counted as double and taken off what has been sentenced.